Skip to main content

Philippians 1:9-10

"And it is my prayer that your love may abound more and more, with knowledge and all discernment, so that you may approve what is excellent, and so be pure and blameless for the day of Christ, filled with the fruit of righteousness that comes through Jesus Christ, to the glory and praise of God."

    Paul tells the Philippians that his wish for them is love--abounding love--overflowing from their hearts.  This is no mere emotion.  This is no ignorant love.  No, it is tempered by knowledge and discernment.  This love requires using our brains.  This love requires knowledge of God's Word and application through wisdom.  But what is the end of this love?  Paul wants us to approve, or choose, that which is excellent.  How do we choose the excellent?

      Firstly, we recognize that life doesn't always offer us the choice between right and wrong.  Sometimes life offers us wrong, right, and more right.  Too often this generation soothes its conscience by saying things like, "Well, the Bible doesn't expressly say it's wrong."  This type of justification clearly demonstrates an uneasiness of conscience and when we catch ourselves in this thought process we ought to flee sin.  We must not satisfy ourselves with this paper thin justification.  We must flee the appearance of evil.  We must be above board. 

    Secondly, we go the extra mile.  We sacrifice for others.  We help others even when it is inconvenient--even when we are forced to go out of our own way.  We must strive to serve and love others as Jesus Christ so perfectly demonstrated to us.  We must not be satisfied as Christians to mind our p's and q's and let that be the extent of it.  We must actively seek to manifest what Paul calls the fruit of righteousness. 

    Why?  Because this is how we glorify God.  This is how we bring Him praise and honor.  When we strive to be pure and holy He is glorified.  He has commanded us not only to do the bare minimum, but to seek the best.

    In the language of Revelation 3, God isn't satisfied with lukewarm Christianity.  Neither should we!

   

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

4 Reasons I Affirm Paedocommunion

If you have interacted with me on social media, you know that I have always been outspoken on the issue of Paedocommunion .  It is a theological position and a liturgical practice about which I am passionate.  Having been raised, and having raised my children, at the Table, I cannot imagine attending a church that didn't allow PC.  I hope that when I am old and gray, I will still be an advocate for bringing little children to the Sacrament. Throughout the 12 years that I have had this blog, I have written scattered thoughts on the topic, but it appears that I have never written a concise summary of my reasons for affirming PC.  I was thoroughly convinced that I had, but I can't seem to locate it, so I guess I never did.  So, to rectify the omission, here are four reasons I hold to PC. 1) Paedocommunion is Biblical.   Any discussion of the topic should start here, and I would hope that both sides of the debate would make this assertion.  However, l...
Post a Comment
Read more

1 Corinthians, the Covenant Hermeneutic, & Paedocommunion

As an adherent to Paedocommunion  (hereafter PC), I have always found it painfully ironic that Credocommunionists use 1 Corinthians 11 to withhold children (among others) from the Table.  One can imagine St. Paul shaking his head as he watches theologians using his discussion of unity at the Table to divide the body at the Table.  You're missing the point! he would say in exasperation.  Not only does 1 Corinthians 11 not forbid PC; I would go so far as to say that there is no better defense of PC in the New Testament than the epistle of 1 Corinthians. Credocommunionist logic is pretty straightforward.  1 Corinthians 11:28 says, "Let a person examine himself, then, and so eat of the bread and drink of the cup."  If, they argue, one is unable to fulfill the exhortation to examine himself, then he may not eat of the bread and drink of the cup.  This is a pretty logical deduction, right? Credobaptists would adamantly agree.  Acts 2:38 says, "Repe...
Post a Comment
Read more

The Real Presence & Paedocommunion: A Deeper Rift Between Reformed Churches

You're going back to Rome! Theological disagreements within the Reformed world, especially those of the last half century, often devolve into these sorts of accusations.  As controversialists like Doug Wilson and Peter Leithart began to break away from the larger conservative Presbyterian and Reformed denominations, it became clear that the rift was deeper than semantics and systematic minutiae.  Much like the Reformation four centuries before, the Table was a primary point of conflict.   What does it mean?  Who may partake?  What do we call it?    These questions, along with a few more, divided Reformed brethren as the physical elements of our religion reflected deeper conflicts.  Good men began to understand that the problem wasn't just in our logos, but in our pathos and ethos, as well. Paedocommunion (hereafter PC) has been one of the hottest points of contention.  PC has always been normal to me as I grew up with it.  I underst...
Post a Comment
Read more