Skip to main content

1 Timothy 1:3-7

"As I urged you when I was going to Macedonia, remain at Ephesus so that you may charge certain persons not to teach any different doctrine, nor to devote themselves to myths and endless genealogies, which promote speculations rather than the stewardship from God that is by faith. The aim of our charge is love that issues from a pure heart and a good conscience and a sincere faith. Certain persons, by swerving from these, have wandered away into vain discussion, desiring to be teachers of the law, without understanding either what they are saying or the things about which they make confident assertions."

    So, internet theologians abound.  Many of them desire to teach, which Paul doesn't reprimand.  In fact, we hear other places that he who desires the office of overseer desires a good, but heavy, office.  Teaching while yourself being ignorant...that's not so good.  Thankfully, as a Christian indulges in the meat of the Word of God, he grows and learns and is able to teach.
   
    Many of these people, and regular church theologians, seem to promote speculation over the truth of God's Word.  I'm sure every teacher, writer, blogger, etc, being imperfect, has done that before.  Subjecting our hearts and wills to the Word of God must be a constant battle we fight.  We must daily submit ourselves to God.  Teachers especially must do this.  The tendency to enjoy fame and/or influence at any level can get to a teacher.  They must constantly read and live the Word's call to humility.
   
    So, Paul says we need to avoid pointless discussions, frivilous speculations, and self-serving arguing.  That is a convicting thought.  Anyone who loves theology and loves to debate knows it's hard to determine where iron sharpening iron becomes worthless arguing.  Motives are an important determiner, and yet, who truly always has perfect motives?  I wish I did, but I can't say that I do.  The need to be right and for other people to admit that often clouds and overpowers the desire to make God's truth known.  It's a pride thing.  Does this mean we should do as they used to in the Golden Years and just avoid discussing religion.  Certainly not!  We need instead to check ourselves constantly while searching the Scriptures for the truth of God, humbly accepting our own limitations and showing deference, patience, and love to others.

    As Christians learn and teach and grow and preach the aim should be, as Paul says, love that issues from a pure heart, a good conscience, and a sincere faith.  Discussing those in detail would fill a whole different post (and it might), but I just want to hit on the idea here for a second.  If we want to avoid selfish, prideful, and divisive behavior, we need these three things.  We need a heart filled with love for others, not self-advancing gain.  We need to search ourselves for good motives.  We need to make sure that Christ and our faith in Him is at the core of all discussion we have theologically, ethically, and philosophically.  Swerve from these and you're guaranteed to wind up somewhere you just don't want to be.  Good teaching must be focused teaching, and that focus must always be on the cross, the Savior that was nailed to it, and the instructions He gave to guide our lives.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Real Presence & Paedocommunion: A Deeper Rift Between Reformed Churches

You're going back to Rome! Theological disagreements within the Reformed world, especially those of the last half century, often devolve into these sorts of accusations.  As controversialists like Doug Wilson and Peter Leithart began to break away from the larger conservative Presbyterian and Reformed denominations, it became clear that the rift was deeper than semantics and systematic minutiae.  Much like the Reformation four centuries before, the Table was a primary point of conflict.   What does it mean?  Who may partake?  What do we call it?    These questions, along with a few more, divided Reformed brethren as the physical elements of our religion reflected deeper conflicts.  Good men began to understand that the problem wasn't just in our logos, but in our pathos and ethos, as well. Paedocommunion (hereafter PC) has been one of the hottest points of contention.  PC has always been normal to me as I grew up with it.  I underst...

Anglicanism, Paedocommunion, & Being Reformed

I consider myself Reformed.  I was baptized as a baby in a PCA church.  I grew up in a Reformed microdenomination that allowed its member churches to subscribe to any of the Reformed confessions (we subscribed to the Three Forms of Unity).  In many ways, whether I like it or not, I still think and act like a Reformed Presbyterian.   Some, however, would seek to deny me that label.  I suspect there are many reasons for this, but paramount among them is that I hold to Paedocommunion (hereafter PC), which, for some reason, is absolutely the worst thing ever to these people.  Some would go so far as to say that PC makes me a heretic, but they all agree that I am certainly not Reformed .   My recent engagement with these opponents of PC has caused me to reflect on what it means to be Reformed and what it means to be a Christian.  This online jousting has dovetailed well with some of my recent study, particularly  An Apology of the Church...

Some Thoughts on the 2024 Election

So, we had an election earlier this week.  Perhaps you heard about it. I have done my best to remain mostly silent on political issues this time around because I have found that fixating on such matters does little for my mental or spiritual health.  Also, no one cares what I think.  Nevertheless, here are a few thoughts on our recent election. 1) I didn't vote for Donald Trump, but I'd be lying if I said I'm not glad he won.  To be clear, that says more about Kamala Harris than about Donald Trump. 2) This election seemed much cleaner--much less suspicious--than the sordid affair we had in 2020.  This election didn't feature any poll workers tallying (discovering? conjuring?) votes behind closed doors in the wee hours of the night, messy mail-in voting, or voter turnout beyond plausible expectations.  The 2020 election had me convinced that we would never see another peaceful, uncontested election, but, as contentious as things were this year, it seems like...