Skip to main content

Learning to take Admonition

One of the most difficult things in the world for humans to do is to receive admonition.  Admonition is painful.  It is repugnant to our pride.  Fallen human nature simply does not like to be told that it is wrong and/or ignorant.  Because we have this natural (read "fallen") predisposition, receiving admonition is one of the premier signs of wisdom.  He who knows the most knows just how little he knows, while he who thinks he knows everything has yet to figure how much more there is left to know!

Enter 2018.

Receiving admonition is especially difficult in an age where our god is Self and our creed is Follow your heart.  Our culture has trained us to be self-centered and belligerent, so being corrected is hardly something we're prepared to take.  I have rights!  I have a voice!  When being true to oneself is the summum bonum, receiving admonition is worthless or even immoral.

So much conflict resolution training, whether it be for the home or work place, focuses on how the person initiating a conversation needs to present his grievance in a way that will be well-received.  At risk of sounding like a chauvinist, I think men are often singled out as needing to be more sensitive in their approach (this emphasis on masculine insensitivity is probably not misguided).  Choosing our words and attitudes wisely is certainly both practical and Biblical (see Proverbs 15:1) because the way that we approach a problem can have a huge impact on whether or not that problem is successfully resolved.

What often happens, however, is that this important truth becomes an excuse for refusing to heed admonition.  How many times have you heard people reject counsel because someone used the wrong tone of voice or chose their words poorly?  I know I'm guilty of this.  I have denied valid concerns brought to me because I didn't like the way they were presented.  If we're honest, I think we all have, whether those words came from a parent, spouse, pastor, boss, coworker, or friend. 

While this is our natural response, it is not necessarily a good one.  Good communication is equal parts speaking and listening, so if we want to be effective communicators, we need to learn to receive truth, no matter how it is spoken.  Of course truth is most effectively communicated with a gentle, humble demeanor and cautious words, but that doesn't imply that words said harshly are automatically false.  We need to train our minds and hearts to heed wisdom and admonition, even if the volume is higher than we'd like.

This is also true of admonition that comes from people that we (to put it bluntly) don't like or don't respect.  Wisdom can come from the most unexpected sources imaginable, from a young child to an old fool.  Sometimes that annoying coworker is going to say something worth hearing.  Sometimes that idiot brother of yours is going to make a good point.  We need to develop the discernment to receive valid admonition, no matter where it originates.

The Christian walk is often a struggle, which is why God gave us each other.  The Christian life was never intended to be lived in isolation.  We need to learn to admonish each other gently and to receive admonition, even when it is isn't proffered as gently as we would like.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

4 Reasons I Affirm Paedocommunion

If you have interacted with me on social media, you know that I have always been outspoken on the issue of Paedocommunion .  It is a theological position and a liturgical practice about which I am passionate.  Having been raised, and having raised my children, at the Table, I cannot imagine attending a church that didn't allow PC.  I hope that when I am old and gray, I will still be an advocate for bringing little children to the Sacrament. Throughout the 12 years that I have had this blog, I have written scattered thoughts on the topic, but it appears that I have never written a concise summary of my reasons for affirming PC.  I was thoroughly convinced that I had, but I can't seem to locate it, so I guess I never did.  So, to rectify the omission, here are four reasons I hold to PC. 1) Paedocommunion is Biblical.   Any discussion of the topic should start here, and I would hope that both sides of the debate would make this assertion.  However, l...

1 Corinthians, the Covenant Hermeneutic, & Paedocommunion

As an adherent to Paedocommunion  (hereafter PC), I have always found it painfully ironic that Credocommunionists use 1 Corinthians 11 to withhold children (among others) from the Table.  One can imagine St. Paul shaking his head as he watches theologians using his discussion of unity at the Table to divide the body at the Table.  You're missing the point! he would say in exasperation.  Not only does 1 Corinthians 11 not forbid PC; I would go so far as to say that there is no better defense of PC in the New Testament than the epistle of 1 Corinthians. Credocommunionist logic is pretty straightforward.  1 Corinthians 11:28 says, "Let a person examine himself, then, and so eat of the bread and drink of the cup."  If, they argue, one is unable to fulfill the exhortation to examine himself, then he may not eat of the bread and drink of the cup.  This is a pretty logical deduction, right? Credobaptists would adamantly agree.  Acts 2:38 says, "Repe...

The Real Presence & Paedocommunion: A Deeper Rift Between Reformed Churches

You're going back to Rome! Theological disagreements within the Reformed world, especially those of the last half century, often devolve into these sorts of accusations.  As controversialists like Doug Wilson and Peter Leithart began to break away from the larger conservative Presbyterian and Reformed denominations, it became clear that the rift was deeper than semantics and systematic minutiae.  Much like the Reformation four centuries before, the Table was a primary point of conflict.   What does it mean?  Who may partake?  What do we call it?    These questions, along with a few more, divided Reformed brethren as the physical elements of our religion reflected deeper conflicts.  Good men began to understand that the problem wasn't just in our logos, but in our pathos and ethos, as well. Paedocommunion (hereafter PC) has been one of the hottest points of contention.  PC has always been normal to me as I grew up with it.  I underst...