Skip to main content

18 Rules to Help You Determine whether or not You Should Vote in 2018

Celebrities from Taylor Swift to LeBron James to Brad Pitt and Leo DiCaprio are once again out spreading the message of the importance of voting (apparently they feel that being famous qualifies them to have an opinion; alas, a platform is no replacement for knowledge!).  These Hollywood types are trying to rile up the youth (a familiar statist and socialistic tactic) of this nation, a demographic that is traditionally progressive, but that rarely votes.  Millennials especially have distanced themselves from the political process, despite being highly-opinionated and strong-willed.

The message being propagated is that everybody has a voice.  Everybody, we are told, has not only the right, but the responsibility, to vote.  Everyone has a civic duty to help decide public policy and who our civic leaders will be for the next 2, 4, or 6 years.

But is that true?

Should we encourage every eligible person to vote?

Does an 18-year-old, fresh out of high school, have the same qualifications to vote as a well-seasoned, mature business owner?  Does a kid, still trying to escape the throngs of adolescence, understand the world and human nature well enough to help determine the course of our political landscape?  Is his opinion as well-informed as that of his elders?

And, yet, I have known 18-year-olds with substantially more political acumen than many 50-somethings, so age shouldn't necessarily disqualify a person from voting any more than it qualifies him to do so.  The stark reality is that not everyone is qualified to help make important decisions, but, that being the case, how do we decide who gets to vote?  History has presented many answers to that question, but I don't know that any answer proffered has been both fair and prudent.  Maybe there isn't a perfect solution.  Maybe there is no equilibrium between elitism and chaos.  We can be sure, however, that a nation that requires a license to drive, to conceal a firearm, heck, to install a hot water tank, but does not require a person to obtain a license or pass a test in order to vote, is always one election away from political upheaval.

As it is, mostly every citizen over the age of 18 has the right to vote, so it falls on those who are unqualified to restrain themselves.  If you aren't sure if you should vote or not, here are 18 rules to remember:

1) If you're only voting because a musician, athlete, or actor told you to vote, please don't vote.

2) If you don't pay taxes, please don't vote (at least not on tax-related issues).

3) If you haven't read a single book in 2018, please don't vote.

4) If you think that the name of our country is America, please don't vote.

5) If you think that the United States of America is a democracy, please don't vote.

6) If you think that the Electoral College is a prestigious law school, please don't vote.

7) If your vote is going to be determined by an ad you saw on TV or heard on the radio, please don't vote.

8) If Taylor Swift will in any way influence your vote, please don't vote (I love you T-Swift, but you're a better songwriter than political commentator).

9) If you would vote for anyone with the last name Clinton, please don't vote.

10) If your vote is going to be determined solely by a candidate's ethnicity or gender, please don't vote.

11) If you think that a meme constitutes a cogent argument, please don't vote.

12) If you think that political candidates are responsible to solve all your problems, please don't vote.

13) If you think history is boring, please don't vote.

14) If you overlook the flaws of a candidate because a "D" or an "R" is beside his name, please don't vote.

15) If you think that the United States is comprised of 48 or 52 states, please don't vote (if you've been voting since before Alaska and Hawaii joined the Union, you may deserve some leeway on this one).

16) If you believe that mumble rap is superior to all other forms of music, please don't vote.

17) If you think that you're supposed to vote as many times as possible to help your side win, like you're voting for a contestant on The Voice or American Idol (now I'm dating myself), please don't vote.

And, finally,

18) If this list actually helped you decide whether or not you should vote, please don't vote.










Comments

Popular posts from this blog

4 Reasons I Affirm Paedocommunion

If you have interacted with me on social media, you know that I have always been outspoken on the issue of Paedocommunion .  It is a theological position and a liturgical practice about which I am passionate.  Having been raised, and having raised my children, at the Table, I cannot imagine attending a church that didn't allow PC.  I hope that when I am old and gray, I will still be an advocate for bringing little children to the Sacrament. Throughout the 12 years that I have had this blog, I have written scattered thoughts on the topic, but it appears that I have never written a concise summary of my reasons for affirming PC.  I was thoroughly convinced that I had, but I can't seem to locate it, so I guess I never did.  So, to rectify the omission, here are four reasons I hold to PC. 1) Paedocommunion is Biblical.   Any discussion of the topic should start here, and I would hope that both sides of the debate would make this assertion.  However, let me clarify what I mean when

1 Corinthians, the Covenant Hermeneutic, & Paedocommunion

As an adherent to Paedocommunion  (hereafter PC), I have always found it painfully ironic that Credocommunionists use 1 Corinthians 11 to withhold children (among others) from the Table.  One can imagine St. Paul shaking his head as he watches theologians using his discussion of unity at the Table to divide the body at the Table.  You're missing the point! he would say in exasperation.  Not only does 1 Corinthians 11 not forbid PC; I would go so far as to say that there is no better defense of PC in the New Testament than the epistle of 1 Corinthians. Credocommunionist logic is pretty straightforward.  1 Corinthians 11:28 says, "Let a person examine himself, then, and so eat of the bread and drink of the cup."  If, they argue, one is unable to fulfill the exhortation to examine himself, then he may not eat of the bread and drink of the cup.  This is a pretty logical deduction, right? Credobaptists would adamantly agree.  Acts 2:38 says, "Repent and be baptized...&quo

Why do you go to church on Sunday?

Why do you go to church on Sunday?  I would assume there are many reasons, but what is the primary reason that you get up on a cold, snowy Sunday morning and get your butt to church?  Further, why has the Church of Jesus Christ consistently gathered together on Sundays (among other days) for the last 2000 years? Throughout my 34 years of church attendance I would have proffered a variety of answers to that question.  As a child I'm sure I went to church because I had to, to see my cousins (who happened to be my best friends), to get bread and wine (weekly communion for the win), etc.  As my faith matured in adulthood these reasons remained, hopefully deepening, but to them were added concepts like rest and theological training. As I moved into Anglicanism I was struck by the deliberate focus on worship .  Why do Christians gather on Sunday morning?  To worship God!  Are teaching and fellowship important?  Absolutely!  Are they aspects of worship?  Certainly!  Is either the primary