Skip to main content

Bernardo Bertolucci and the Hypocrisy of the Film Industry

A legendary director has passed.  Many average film watchers may not know the name Bernardo Bertolucci, but his extensive career was full of accolades and his work continues to be influential.  As news of his passing spread across the web, the crying emojis and RIPs spread like ripples in a pond.  Film critics and self-proclaimed movie buffs everywhere are mourning the passing of our one the great filmmakers of cinematic history. 

I, too, mourn his passing, but not for the same reasons.  I mourn his passing the way that I mourn the death of any unrepentant sinner.  I mourn because I know that he is not resting in peace.  I am happy to say that I have never seen a Bertolucci film, so I cannot speak to his talent as a director, but regarding the content of his films, I will admit that Bertolucci was ahead of his time, but not in a good way.  You see, Bernardo Bertolucci was basically a glorified pornographer.  He pushed the boundaries of what could be placed in films, both culturally and legally (his films were often banned or edited in foreign countries, including the U.S.).  He was basically the Italian (and so much more audacious) version of Stanley Kubrick or Martin Scorsese.  His work, although still shocking even decades later, helped to normalize graphic nudity and sexuality in films.  He was basically a perv with a camera.

And so, as I see his passing being mourned by film lovers worldwide, I have to ask, Why do we celebrate men like this?  Any talent that Bernardo Bertolucci may have had is badly obscured by the sexually explicit nature of his work.  Again, I have never actually seen any of his films, but the "Parents Guide" section on IMDB for most of his films reads like a smutty novel.  As far as I'm concerned, no director/writer worth his salt needs to fill his films with sexually explicit material to get people to watch them.  His films not only contain strong sexuality, they feature it.  His films are infamously and overtly sexual.  Sex is about the only story he knew how to tell.

Moreover, how can anyone in the 21st century, the age of the #metoo movement, celebrate a man like Bertolucci.  His work objectified especially the female body, but also the male body, and sexuality as a whole.  One of his most famous films actually features a rape scene that permanently scarred the actress who was involved.  He epitomizes the hypocrisy of the film industry, which ardently claims to support the emancipation and protection of women, while harboring and celebrating those who use, abuse, and objectify them.  You cannot claim the moral high ground while celebrating men like Bernardo Bertolucci.   

So, I mourn, but I do not mourn the loss of talented director or a cutting-edge writer.  I mourn the passing of another lost soul.  I mourn the celebration of his legacy of debauchery. 


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

"Father, Forgive Them"

“Father, forgive them, for they know not what they do.” Forgiveness is hard.  Forgiveness is really, really hard. It’s difficult to forgive others who have genuinely harmed or offended us.   It’s easy to say , “I forgive you,” but it’s extremely difficult to feel it–to make peace in our hearts with the injustices that others have perpetrated against us. It just doesn’t feel right.  Sin should be punished!  Wrongs should be righted!  Right?! It’s difficult to forgive others when they ask for it.  It’s even more difficult to forgive them when they haven’t asked for it–when they don’t even recognize what they’ve done to hurt us. As our Savior hung upon His Cross, He asked the Father to forgive those nearby–those who were unwittingly contributing to the greatest injustice in the history of the world. These thieves, soldiers, and standers-by had no idea what was happening.  They had no idea that the jealousy of the Jews had placed Christ on that Cross...

5 Reasons I Want my Wife to Start Wearing a Head Covering during Corporate Worship

    Of late, the issue of head coverings has come up in my circle.  Okay...my cousin and I have been discussing it, but the point is, the issue has been bouncing around my head for the past few days.  It is a topic that I have avoided for some time.  Every time I read through 1 Corinthians, I would tell myself, "We'll get around to that."  The reality is that I didn't want to be "that guy"...that guy who people view as a chauvinistic jerk who wants to make sure everyone--especially his wife--remembers that he's the head of his home.  I think I'm beginning to respect "that guy"--those men who have cared enough to stand for what they believe.     Let me be clear that I am referring to head coverings for women (those old enough to leave them on...)  DURING CORPORATE WORSHIP.  I am not advocating head coverings at all times.  Though I see nothing necessarily wrong that practice, I don't see any command for it either.   ...

Paedocommunion: Consistent Covenantalism or Anti-Confessionalism?

    Being raised as a paedocommunionist (that means our kids get to eat Jesus, too), I have always been amazed by how passionately credocommunionists (that means their kids don't get to eat Jesus until they articulate a "credible" profession of faith) dislike the practice.  I would think that they could look at paedocommunion and at least respect it as an attempt to live out Covenant Theology in a consistent way.  Instead, paedocommunionists have been widely viewed as being on the fringe of the fringe (yes, that far) of Reformed Theology.  I like to think that I have been able to agree-to-disagree in an amicable way with my credocommunionist friends.  However, I will admit that being discounted as "unconfessional" (trust me, I've been called worse) has made many paedocommunionists (you'd have to ask my friends whether or not that applies to me) act in a manner that lacks Christian grace.     So, the question remains, is paedocommunion a view hel...