Skip to main content

Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and Public Education in the United States

The midterm election cycle of 2018 was one of the more tumultuous in recent memory, which is saying something!  In the end there was only a moderate amount of upheaval as some new faces and new ideals replaced old ones and the House went to the Democrats.  One of these new faces, one that has been both news-worthy and meme-worthy, is that of Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez.  As has been the case with her face, her name and faux pas have basically been unavoidable for the last few months.

Ocasio-Cortez's election is significant because her victory represents more than just the triumph of a particular political campaign in New York's 14th congressional district; her victory signals a new political epoch.  She represents the rise of a generation fully willing to embrace political and economic ideals that directly contradict the principles upon which this country was founded.

There is much that is compelling about Ocasio-Cortez, both to Millennials and previous generations of liberals.  For starters, being relatively good-looking, she is TV-friendly and Internet-friendly.  She offers the kind of youthfulness (I was surprised to discover that she is exactly two months my senior)  and passion for change that are so refreshing and got Obama elected.  Even to those of us who find her election mind-boggling, she certainly seems to be sincere in her beliefs.  She genuinely wants to change the world, which is noble enough.  Add to this the fact that she comes from a working-class, minority family and you have a like-able, sell-able political candidate. 

But...

She seems to have a way of putting her foot in her mouth.  There's an adage that says, "It's better to remain silent and be thought a fool than to speak and remove all doubt." With all due respect, she may want to consider this saying.  Now, to her credit, she's new to this game.  She isn't used to having microphones shoved in her face and having every word dissected.  It's hard to feel too bad, however, for someone who is putting herself out there so pervasively, doing numerous interviews and posting videos on social media.  Avoiding the likes of Ben Shapiro is probably her smartest move yet!  Perhaps her most unfortunate gaff was when she was unable to articulate properly the three branches of the U.S. government.  You'll note that this is a personal video, not an interview where she was caught off guard.  There have been a number of other moments where her knowledge (or, more properly, her ignorance) of civics, economics, history, and international affairs, to say nothing of logic, have made her appear to be under-qualified for the position to which she has been elected. 

Another trait that makes her so compelling, and what makes her ignorance so difficult to fathom, is that she is an "educated" woman, particularly for her economic class.  She has a history of academic excellence and holds a bachelor's degree in economics and international affairs from Boston University.  However, knowing that she received such a degree tells me more about the academic institution she attended than it does about her.  Ocasio-Cortez is so important because she is a microcosm of the failed education system in America.  Our education system teaches propaganda instead of history (maybe it hasn't failed in its intended purpose after all).  It reinforces tolerance instead of morality.  It encourages environmental activism instead of stewardship and political activism instead of civics and economics.  Ocasio-Cortez is in every way a product of the system; she is the epitome of what our educational system produces.  If there were ever any doubt, it is now apparent that being educated is not the same thing as being well-informed.

Alas, we have an entire generation of "educated" people embracing political, moral, and economic ideals that would make our founding fathers turn over in their graves.  You see, Ocasio-Cortez represents a generation of young people who are openly endorsing and proclaiming the moral superiority of Socialism and its sister ideologies.  Ocasio-Cortez is a member of the Democratic Socialists of America.  A decade ago when Obama was accused of being a socialist, he vehemently denied it.  If he had been running in '16, he wouldn't have had to do so.  Hillary, even with a last name like Clinton, had to rig the primaries in her favor to keep Bernie Sanders, another open socialist, from representing the Democrats against Trump in the general election (an election Sanders had a good chance of winning).

The ideals of Socialism, explicit or implicit, are becoming more and more palatable with every election, and this has everything to do with the public education system in our nation.  You see, public education is fundamentally socialistic.  That children should leave their parents to be trained in irreligious, cookie-cutter schools for 40-50 hours a week is, and always has been, a socialistic ideal.  Replacing the family and the Church with the State, creating a secular community with a secular head, is the goal of Socialism, Communism, and Fascism alike.  Compulsory education is a cornerstone of any good socialistic society.  The design of our educational system, in imitation of those in Europe and Scandinavia, was to create citizens, not thinkers.  That Ocasio-Cortez holds a degree in economics and international affairs, and remains a socialist, tells me that her education provided her with more indoctrination and propaganda than knowledge and critical thinking skills. 

Ocasio-Cortez is a name you should probably get used to hearing.  Depending on how her first term goes, she could be set to make the kind of meteoric rise Obama experienced.  She is the most dangerous type of politician--marketable, sincere, educated, and ignorant.  Corrupt politicians are certainly a plague to any constituency, but they are no match for misguided zealots who believe that more government is the answer to society's problems.  Ocasio-Cortez appears to be the latter.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

"Father, Forgive Them"

“Father, forgive them, for they know not what they do.” Forgiveness is hard.  Forgiveness is really, really hard. It’s difficult to forgive others who have genuinely harmed or offended us.   It’s easy to say , “I forgive you,” but it’s extremely difficult to feel it–to make peace in our hearts with the injustices that others have perpetrated against us. It just doesn’t feel right.  Sin should be punished!  Wrongs should be righted!  Right?! It’s difficult to forgive others when they ask for it.  It’s even more difficult to forgive them when they haven’t asked for it–when they don’t even recognize what they’ve done to hurt us. As our Savior hung upon His Cross, He asked the Father to forgive those nearby–those who were unwittingly contributing to the greatest injustice in the history of the world. These thieves, soldiers, and standers-by had no idea what was happening.  They had no idea that the jealousy of the Jews had placed Christ on that Cross...

5 Reasons I Want my Wife to Start Wearing a Head Covering during Corporate Worship

    Of late, the issue of head coverings has come up in my circle.  Okay...my cousin and I have been discussing it, but the point is, the issue has been bouncing around my head for the past few days.  It is a topic that I have avoided for some time.  Every time I read through 1 Corinthians, I would tell myself, "We'll get around to that."  The reality is that I didn't want to be "that guy"...that guy who people view as a chauvinistic jerk who wants to make sure everyone--especially his wife--remembers that he's the head of his home.  I think I'm beginning to respect "that guy"--those men who have cared enough to stand for what they believe.     Let me be clear that I am referring to head coverings for women (those old enough to leave them on...)  DURING CORPORATE WORSHIP.  I am not advocating head coverings at all times.  Though I see nothing necessarily wrong that practice, I don't see any command for it either.   ...

Paedocommunion: Consistent Covenantalism or Anti-Confessionalism?

    Being raised as a paedocommunionist (that means our kids get to eat Jesus, too), I have always been amazed by how passionately credocommunionists (that means their kids don't get to eat Jesus until they articulate a "credible" profession of faith) dislike the practice.  I would think that they could look at paedocommunion and at least respect it as an attempt to live out Covenant Theology in a consistent way.  Instead, paedocommunionists have been widely viewed as being on the fringe of the fringe (yes, that far) of Reformed Theology.  I like to think that I have been able to agree-to-disagree in an amicable way with my credocommunionist friends.  However, I will admit that being discounted as "unconfessional" (trust me, I've been called worse) has made many paedocommunionists (you'd have to ask my friends whether or not that applies to me) act in a manner that lacks Christian grace.     So, the question remains, is paedocommunion a view hel...