Skip to main content

Why Stores Raising the Age to Buy a Gun is a Good Thing

A few stores, such as Wal-Mart and Dick's, have raised the age to buy a gun at their stores, and 2nd Amendment advocates are up in arms (pun intended) about it!  To many a hillbilly (I mean that in the best possible way--I come from a long line of hillbillies), Wal-Mart not selling their 18-year-old a shotgun is pretty much tantamount to Armageddon.  I would argue, however, that this actually a good thing.  You see, that's what freedom is all about.  Wal-Mart should be free to sell, or not sell, a firearm, or any other product for that matter, to any person they please.  You, as a private citizen, are free to shop elsewhere.  Wal-Mart has no obligation to sell you anything!  That's how this system is supposed to work.

We must be consistent here, folks!  If what we really want is the government to stop regulating guns, then we can't demand that the government force stores to sell guns at the legal age.  That's still regulating guns.  I would argue that the government shouldn't even establish a minimum age (no one cares what I think because I'm just a non-interventionist libertarian!), but they certainly shouldn't force proprietors to sell at that age.  Purveyors of firearms are free to establish their own minimum age to buy any given product.  They should be free to do this based on a) their potential liability, and b) their political/religious views.  

That's why this is actually a good thing.  If stores take the initiative and raise the age, then the government won't have to.  The less involved the government is, the better.  Let the free market sort things out!  So, don't worry, people of Wal-Mart!  By establishing their own restrictions, Wal-Mart is actually helping to avoid added legislation!

Herein lies the problem.  Many of America's modern "conservatives" have essentially the same view of government intrusion as liberals do--they're all for it!  Liberals and conservatives have different agendas that they want enforced, but they agree on Uncle Sam enforcing theirs.

If we truly want freedom, as we so often claim, then we must be consistent.  This freedom extends to business no less than it does to individuals.  No one should be able to force you to buy something, and, conversely, no one should be able to force you to sell something.  It's really that simple.  If I don't want to sell my products or services to Joe Schmoe because I think he smells bad, that should be my right.  If I don't want to sell you something because of a religious, philosophical, or cultural reason, I shouldn't have to.  That's what the free market is all about!  Sometimes freedom means people are allowed to be jerks and bigots.  The answer is not restricting everyone's freedom to eliminate the possibility of someone being refused service for the wrong reason.  The answer is to let the free market work itself out.  If I capriciously choose those with whom I will do business, I will probably not be in business very long.

So rest easy, NRA members!  Let the free market work!  Find somewhere else to buy your gun.

P.S. Incidentally, I actually bought my first gun (basically this, but with the sand camo finish--it was on sale) at Dick's at the age of 18 or 19.  

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Real Presence & Paedocommunion: A Deeper Rift Between Reformed Churches

You're going back to Rome! Theological disagreements within the Reformed world, especially those of the last half century, often devolve into these sorts of accusations.  As controversialists like Doug Wilson and Peter Leithart began to break away from the larger conservative Presbyterian and Reformed denominations, it became clear that the rift was deeper than semantics and systematic minutiae.  Much like the Reformation four centuries before, the Table was a primary point of conflict.   What does it mean?  Who may partake?  What do we call it?    These questions, along with a few more, divided Reformed brethren as the physical elements of our religion reflected deeper conflicts.  Good men began to understand that the problem wasn't just in our logos, but in our pathos and ethos, as well. Paedocommunion (hereafter PC) has been one of the hottest points of contention.  PC has always been normal to me as I grew up with it.  I underst...

Anglicanism, Paedocommunion, & Being Reformed

I consider myself Reformed.  I was baptized as a baby in a PCA church.  I grew up in a Reformed microdenomination that allowed its member churches to subscribe to any of the Reformed confessions (we subscribed to the Three Forms of Unity).  In many ways, whether I like it or not, I still think and act like a Reformed Presbyterian.   Some, however, would seek to deny me that label.  I suspect there are many reasons for this, but paramount among them is that I hold to Paedocommunion (hereafter PC), which, for some reason, is absolutely the worst thing ever to these people.  Some would go so far as to say that PC makes me a heretic, but they all agree that I am certainly not Reformed .   My recent engagement with these opponents of PC has caused me to reflect on what it means to be Reformed and what it means to be a Christian.  This online jousting has dovetailed well with some of my recent study, particularly  An Apology of the Church...

Some Thoughts on the 2024 Election

So, we had an election earlier this week.  Perhaps you heard about it. I have done my best to remain mostly silent on political issues this time around because I have found that fixating on such matters does little for my mental or spiritual health.  Also, no one cares what I think.  Nevertheless, here are a few thoughts on our recent election. 1) I didn't vote for Donald Trump, but I'd be lying if I said I'm not glad he won.  To be clear, that says more about Kamala Harris than about Donald Trump. 2) This election seemed much cleaner--much less suspicious--than the sordid affair we had in 2020.  This election didn't feature any poll workers tallying (discovering? conjuring?) votes behind closed doors in the wee hours of the night, messy mail-in voting, or voter turnout beyond plausible expectations.  The 2020 election had me convinced that we would never see another peaceful, uncontested election, but, as contentious as things were this year, it seems like...