Skip to main content

Eric Clapton and the Power of Capitalism

So last night I was driving home and Layla by Derek and the Dominos began to play.  Naturally, I turned it up, and then I began to think about Eric Clapton and how diverse his career has been.  When, I wondered, was he in Derek and the Dominos?  Was it before or after Cream?  And what was the name of that other band he was in?  Oh yeah, the Yardbirds!  For the record, Derek and the Dominos was a brief project, lasting only from '70 to '71.

Anyway, as I pulled into my driveway, I decided I should probably buy a biography about Eric Clapton, so I quickly pulled out my phone, googled "Amazon...books about Eric Clapton," and ordered his autobiography.  Ain't technology amazing!

As I was checking out (on Amazon...not from life or reality or anything like that), I realized that the shipping options were all free!  I backed out of the checkout to make sure that I hadn't accidentally signed up for Amazon Prime (I a) am not ready for that type of commitment, and b) fear that I would buy way too many things from Amazon) and realized that they were giving me free shipping as part of a free trial of Amazon Prime.  Score!  No, thank you, I would not like to sign up, but, yes, I will take the free shipping this time around!

This is where the story gets interesting.  When I checked my email this morning, I had an advertisement from Wal-Mart.  That advertisement boasted the fact that they offer free shipping.  This, I thought to myself, is no coincidence.  Wal-Mart is a lot of things, but they ain't stupid!  They know that, if they want to survive, they're going to have to cater to the lazy, socially-retarded Millennials of my generation (for the record, I try to order books and music from Amazon only when I can't find them locally), so you can buy all their products online and have them shipped to your house for free.  That's ridiculous!  That, my friends, is the power of competition.  That is the power, dare I say, of capitalism.

Capitalism, true capitalism, increases productivity and quality, while simultaneously lowering costs.  When businesses compete for your hard-earned dollars, you benefit. You're the boss.  That means companies have to figure out new, better ways to provide you with products and services, all for less dough than their competitors.

You wanna know why healthcare, education, and energy all cost so much?  Blame Uncle Sam!  Government involvement eliminates competition.  Does anyone really think that the public school system is an example of government effectiveness and efficiency?  Yeah, that's what I thought.  Not only will things cost more when the government meddles, but it will also diminish quality and stunt creativity and technological advancement.  You guys remember the whole "Net Neutrality" thing?  That's a perfect example.  When companies are free to personalize their services to their audience, you win.  I think the next 10 years will bring a complete overhaul in how we "Internet," and the result will be cheaper, better service.

Don't get me wrong, greed is evil.  Wanting to make a profit, however, is not greed, and when someone wants to and is free to make a profit based on the value of their products and services, the consumer wins.  Even greedy corporations, which probably includes most of your Fortune 500, still benefit the consumer.  In fact, capitalism is what allows the consumer to benefit from the greed of multinational corporations.  When competition is removed, the consumer is helpless.  If I only have one company from which to buy a product, I have no way of controlling what I get and how much I pay for it as their is no incentive for that company to keep prices down and quality up.  They know I have to buy their product, and they know I have to buy it from them!  Competition is the consumer's natural defense against being abused.

Well, Amazon says my book should be arriving between March 7th and March 13th (apparently the free trial did not guarantee free two-day shipping), so I'll be eagerly awaiting my package.  Is there anything as exciting as seeing that Amazon package sticking out of your mailbox? 



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

4 Reasons I Affirm Paedocommunion

If you have interacted with me on social media, you know that I have always been outspoken on the issue of Paedocommunion .  It is a theological position and a liturgical practice about which I am passionate.  Having been raised, and having raised my children, at the Table, I cannot imagine attending a church that didn't allow PC.  I hope that when I am old and gray, I will still be an advocate for bringing little children to the Sacrament. Throughout the 12 years that I have had this blog, I have written scattered thoughts on the topic, but it appears that I have never written a concise summary of my reasons for affirming PC.  I was thoroughly convinced that I had, but I can't seem to locate it, so I guess I never did.  So, to rectify the omission, here are four reasons I hold to PC. 1) Paedocommunion is Biblical.   Any discussion of the topic should start here, and I would hope that both sides of the debate would make this assertion.  However, let me clarify what I mean when

1 Corinthians, the Covenant Hermeneutic, & Paedocommunion

As an adherent to Paedocommunion  (hereafter PC), I have always found it painfully ironic that Credocommunionists use 1 Corinthians 11 to withhold children (among others) from the Table.  One can imagine St. Paul shaking his head as he watches theologians using his discussion of unity at the Table to divide the body at the Table.  You're missing the point! he would say in exasperation.  Not only does 1 Corinthians 11 not forbid PC; I would go so far as to say that there is no better defense of PC in the New Testament than the epistle of 1 Corinthians. Credocommunionist logic is pretty straightforward.  1 Corinthians 11:28 says, "Let a person examine himself, then, and so eat of the bread and drink of the cup."  If, they argue, one is unable to fulfill the exhortation to examine himself, then he may not eat of the bread and drink of the cup.  This is a pretty logical deduction, right? Credobaptists would adamantly agree.  Acts 2:38 says, "Repent and be baptized...&quo

Why do you go to church on Sunday?

Why do you go to church on Sunday?  I would assume there are many reasons, but what is the primary reason that you get up on a cold, snowy Sunday morning and get your butt to church?  Further, why has the Church of Jesus Christ consistently gathered together on Sundays (among other days) for the last 2000 years? Throughout my 34 years of church attendance I would have proffered a variety of answers to that question.  As a child I'm sure I went to church because I had to, to see my cousins (who happened to be my best friends), to get bread and wine (weekly communion for the win), etc.  As my faith matured in adulthood these reasons remained, hopefully deepening, but to them were added concepts like rest and theological training. As I moved into Anglicanism I was struck by the deliberate focus on worship .  Why do Christians gather on Sunday morning?  To worship God!  Are teaching and fellowship important?  Absolutely!  Are they aspects of worship?  Certainly!  Is either the primary