Skip to main content

The Shape of Water and the #MeToo Movement

Now, I like Guillermo Del Toro--at least I used to--as he has traditionally made original and interesting movies, but while The Shape of Water may very well be both of those things, I think it illustrates Del Toro's slide deeper and deeper into depravity, as well as many of our culture's problems.  In case you missed it (you're probably better off if you did), The Shape of Water contains some pretty indecent sexual material.  To be clear, I did not watch this film as the "Parent's Guide" section over at IMDB was enough to dissuade me from seeing it.  I warn you, that section reads like a pornographic fantasy novel (not that I've ever read one).  As if his last film's incestuous material, disturbing though not quite graphic, was not enough, he had to push the envelope to include interspecies sexuality, to say nothing of the graphic nudity, this time around.

Now, in past years a feature film featuring interspecies intercourse probably would have caused quite the stir in this country.  Can you imagine what America would have done in the 50's?  The 70's?  Even the 90's or 2000's?  There would have been uproars and boycotts and all that good stuff, and rightfully so.  This year?  It won best film!

Now, Hollywood has had a pretty rough year, given all the scandals and allegations of sexual misconduct.  The #metoo movement arose as a response to the eternal lack of accountability for the Hollywood elites who have been sexually abusing their pawns for generations.  Though this movement has had its issues, it is a noble cause.  So what does the Academy do?  As they have commonly done in recent years, they gave the Oscar for best film to a movie that contains aberrant sexuality!  How fitting!

Hollywood, you cannot have it both ways.  You cannot say that you support women and simultaneously reward their objectification.  You cannot claim to respect women while monetizing their oversexualization.  You cannot assert your moral superiority regarding the treatment of the fairer sex while plastering their naked bodies all over the silver screen.  You cannot profess to honor, respect, and value women while immortalizing their shame.  You can't do it.  Your true colors are showing.

Further, you cannot claim to support healthy sexuality while glorifying monstrosities.  The slope is slippery, as they say.  Our culture has increasingly become desensitized to sexual content in movies and on TV.  Sexuality led to nudity.  Nudity led to graphic nudity.  Graphic nudity led to incest and other aberrant sexuality.  What's next?  Pedophilia?  If Hollywood's true colors are fully seen, that is unavoidable. 

This is that state of our country, whether we like it or not.  We are no longer shockable.  We are no longer offended by the degradation of the human body and the abuse of human sexuality.  We no longer boycott aberrant sexuality.  We give it an Oscar.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

5 Reasons I Want my Wife to Start Wearing a Head Covering during Corporate Worship

    Of late, the issue of head coverings has come up in my circle.  Okay...my cousin and I have been discussing it, but the point is, the issue has been bouncing around my head for the past few days.  It is a topic that I have avoided for some time.  Every time I read through 1 Corinthians, I would tell myself, "We'll get around to that."  The reality is that I didn't want to be "that guy"...that guy who people view as a chauvinistic jerk who wants to make sure everyone--especially his wife--remembers that he's the head of his home.  I think I'm beginning to respect "that guy"--those men who have cared enough to stand for what they believe.     Let me be clear that I am referring to head coverings for women (those old enough to leave them on...)  DURING CORPORATE WORSHIP.  I am not advocating head coverings at all times.  Though I see nothing necessarily wrong that practice, I don't see any command for it either.   ...

Halftime Shows, Kid Rock, & Celebrity Conversions

Conversions are often for the sake of expedience.  Android users adopt Apple products.  Energy drink drinkers start drinking coffee.  Fair-weather fans join the bandwagon for whatever team seems to be building a dynasty.  People are always changing their allegiances when it is convenient to do so. Religious conversions are no exception.  Such a conversion is often costly, as Christians in places like Nigeria and Pakistan can attest, but it is just as often done for power, money, or respectability.  Christianity, especially the quaint, neo-conservative kind that opposes Commies, supports Israel, and produces alternative entertainment content, is kind of in right now, so it's fair to question celebrity conversions at this particular moment in American history. Much has been made of the fact that Kid Rock headlined a conservative, religious alternative to Bad Bunny's halftime show.  If you don't know, Kid Rock hasn't exactly spent his career creating fa...

Paedocommunion: Consistent Covenantalism or Anti-Confessionalism?

    Being raised as a paedocommunionist (that means our kids get to eat Jesus, too), I have always been amazed by how passionately credocommunionists (that means their kids don't get to eat Jesus until they articulate a "credible" profession of faith) dislike the practice.  I would think that they could look at paedocommunion and at least respect it as an attempt to live out Covenant Theology in a consistent way.  Instead, paedocommunionists have been widely viewed as being on the fringe of the fringe (yes, that far) of Reformed Theology.  I like to think that I have been able to agree-to-disagree in an amicable way with my credocommunionist friends.  However, I will admit that being discounted as "unconfessional" (trust me, I've been called worse) has made many paedocommunionists (you'd have to ask my friends whether or not that applies to me) act in a manner that lacks Christian grace.     So, the question remains, is paedocommunion a view hel...