Skip to main content

The Shape of Water and the #MeToo Movement

Now, I like Guillermo Del Toro--at least I used to--as he has traditionally made original and interesting movies, but while The Shape of Water may very well be both of those things, I think it illustrates Del Toro's slide deeper and deeper into depravity, as well as many of our culture's problems.  In case you missed it (you're probably better off if you did), The Shape of Water contains some pretty indecent sexual material.  To be clear, I did not watch this film as the "Parent's Guide" section over at IMDB was enough to dissuade me from seeing it.  I warn you, that section reads like a pornographic fantasy novel (not that I've ever read one).  As if his last film's incestuous material, disturbing though not quite graphic, was not enough, he had to push the envelope to include interspecies sexuality, to say nothing of the graphic nudity, this time around.

Now, in past years a feature film featuring interspecies intercourse probably would have caused quite the stir in this country.  Can you imagine what America would have done in the 50's?  The 70's?  Even the 90's or 2000's?  There would have been uproars and boycotts and all that good stuff, and rightfully so.  This year?  It won best film!

Now, Hollywood has had a pretty rough year, given all the scandals and allegations of sexual misconduct.  The #metoo movement arose as a response to the eternal lack of accountability for the Hollywood elites who have been sexually abusing their pawns for generations.  Though this movement has had its issues, it is a noble cause.  So what does the Academy do?  As they have commonly done in recent years, they gave the Oscar for best film to a movie that contains aberrant sexuality!  How fitting!

Hollywood, you cannot have it both ways.  You cannot say that you support women and simultaneously reward their objectification.  You cannot claim to respect women while monetizing their oversexualization.  You cannot assert your moral superiority regarding the treatment of the fairer sex while plastering their naked bodies all over the silver screen.  You cannot profess to honor, respect, and value women while immortalizing their shame.  You can't do it.  Your true colors are showing.

Further, you cannot claim to support healthy sexuality while glorifying monstrosities.  The slope is slippery, as they say.  Our culture has increasingly become desensitized to sexual content in movies and on TV.  Sexuality led to nudity.  Nudity led to graphic nudity.  Graphic nudity led to incest and other aberrant sexuality.  What's next?  Pedophilia?  If Hollywood's true colors are fully seen, that is unavoidable. 

This is that state of our country, whether we like it or not.  We are no longer shockable.  We are no longer offended by the degradation of the human body and the abuse of human sexuality.  We no longer boycott aberrant sexuality.  We give it an Oscar.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

"Father, Forgive Them"

“Father, forgive them, for they know not what they do.” Forgiveness is hard.  Forgiveness is really, really hard. It’s difficult to forgive others who have genuinely harmed or offended us.   It’s easy to say , “I forgive you,” but it’s extremely difficult to feel it–to make peace in our hearts with the injustices that others have perpetrated against us. It just doesn’t feel right.  Sin should be punished!  Wrongs should be righted!  Right?! It’s difficult to forgive others when they ask for it.  It’s even more difficult to forgive them when they haven’t asked for it–when they don’t even recognize what they’ve done to hurt us. As our Savior hung upon His Cross, He asked the Father to forgive those nearby–those who were unwittingly contributing to the greatest injustice in the history of the world. These thieves, soldiers, and standers-by had no idea what was happening.  They had no idea that the jealousy of the Jews had placed Christ on that Cross...

The Real Presence & Paedocommunion: A Deeper Rift Between Reformed Churches

You're going back to Rome! Theological disagreements within the Reformed world, especially those of the last half century, often devolve into these sorts of accusations.  As controversialists like Doug Wilson and Peter Leithart began to break away from the larger conservative Presbyterian and Reformed denominations, it became clear that the rift was deeper than semantics and systematic minutiae.  Much like the Reformation four centuries before, the Table was a primary point of conflict.   What does it mean?  Who may partake?  What do we call it?    These questions, along with a few more, divided Reformed brethren as the physical elements of our religion reflected deeper conflicts.  Good men began to understand that the problem wasn't just in our logos, but in our pathos and ethos, as well. Paedocommunion (hereafter PC) has been one of the hottest points of contention.  PC has always been normal to me as I grew up with it.  I underst...

"The More Things Change..." or "Joe Biden Doing Joe Biden Things"

1 Samuel 2  relates the story of Eli, the well-meaning high priest whose only flaw (apparently) was his refusal to discipline his sons.  These sons, described as worthless men , utilized their position to abuse the people and indulge their lusts with impunity.  Eli's dereliction of duty brought his otherwise noble career in service to God's house to an ignominious end.   There are, of course, important differences between Eli and Joe Biden.  Joe Biden is not a religious leader (though he is a practicing Roman Catholic ), nor would I consider his record to be otherwise spotless.  However, similarly to Eli,  Biden's pardoning of his own  worthless son, Hunter, will prove to be his legacy.  His long (and I mean loooong) career in politics will likely be overshadowed, even in the eyes of those who previously respected him, by this one shameless act.  By pardoning his son despite  promising not to, Biden has yet again demonstrate...