Skip to main content

The Impetus of Leadership

Leadership.  If you want to start an argument, discussing leadership is as easy a way as any.  Who should lead, how should they lead, and what it means to lead are all hot topics.  One very popular leadership philosophy in our postmodern world (our post-postmodern--I'm not sure where we're at in 2018) is to be a very passive leader.  In other words, you lead by not really leading at all.  Parents let their kids make their own decisions, managers don't really manage their employees, and husbands don't lead their wives.  No one wants to offend anyone or take responsibility, so leaders are impotent.

This philosophy or style of leadership, sometimes explicit and sometimes implicit, is an overreaction to the despotism, chauvinism, and insensitivity to which human nature so naturally inclines.  As such, it expresses legitimate concerns, but the answer to a problem is never to abandon the good and the right into order to avoid the bad and destructive.

Moreover, leadership is not optional.  If you are in a position of authority or leadership, you don't have the option of not leading.  If the President of the United States fails to do his job, it doesn't simply mean that he is not a good President.  It means that he is a bad President.  He is a failure of a President.  He has been negligent, perhaps even criminally so.  He has been derelict of his duty and there should be repercussions.  The same is true for any leader.  Leading is not a prerogative; it is a calling.  If we are called to lead, we may do no other.  Unfortunately, many of America's leaders, in the family, church, and state, have been criminally negligent.

This impetus of leadership means that it is important a) to identify if you have been to called to leadership; and b) to make sure that you understand what true leadership is.  The latter is a complex topic that deserves its own treatment, but the former can be summarized in this way: if you are in a valid position of leadership, and if you have been placed in that position through legitimate means, you are called to lead.  If you are a father, you are called to lead your family.  If you are a mother, you are called to lead your children under the headship of your husband.  If you are a pastor or an elder, you are called to lead your sheep.  If you are a manager or a civil servant, you are called to lead those under your watch.

Let me single out dads for a second.  Maybe you don't think you're a leader.  Maybe your personality and past don't lend themselves to you assuming that role naturally.  It doesn't matter.  If you are a father who still has children in your home, you are a leader.  You cannot give that responsibility, that calling, away.  You will either be a good leader or a bad leader, you cannot simply not be a leader.  You will be faithful, though certainly imperfect, or you will be negligent.  Even if you don't believe in God, you have a calling from Him to lead your family.  And you know what?  Your role model for that calling is none other than our Heavenly Father Himself!  Intimidated yet?  If that doesn't scare you a little bit, you probably aren't taking your role seriously enough!  You are called to love and lead your children as God loves, instructs, provides for, and disciplines His children.  You are called to lead your wife as Christ leads His bride.  That's a high calling!  Talk about aiming for the impossible!

No matter what position of leadership you fill, your job is to lead.  Do you have regrets?  Weaknesses?  Sins?  We all do.  Don't let them stop you from leading.  Lead humbly, lovingly, and gently, but lead all the same.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

"Father, Forgive Them"

“Father, forgive them, for they know not what they do.” Forgiveness is hard.  Forgiveness is really, really hard. It’s difficult to forgive others who have genuinely harmed or offended us.   It’s easy to say , “I forgive you,” but it’s extremely difficult to feel it–to make peace in our hearts with the injustices that others have perpetrated against us. It just doesn’t feel right.  Sin should be punished!  Wrongs should be righted!  Right?! It’s difficult to forgive others when they ask for it.  It’s even more difficult to forgive them when they haven’t asked for it–when they don’t even recognize what they’ve done to hurt us. As our Savior hung upon His Cross, He asked the Father to forgive those nearby–those who were unwittingly contributing to the greatest injustice in the history of the world. These thieves, soldiers, and standers-by had no idea what was happening.  They had no idea that the jealousy of the Jews had placed Christ on that Cross...

5 Reasons I Want my Wife to Start Wearing a Head Covering during Corporate Worship

    Of late, the issue of head coverings has come up in my circle.  Okay...my cousin and I have been discussing it, but the point is, the issue has been bouncing around my head for the past few days.  It is a topic that I have avoided for some time.  Every time I read through 1 Corinthians, I would tell myself, "We'll get around to that."  The reality is that I didn't want to be "that guy"...that guy who people view as a chauvinistic jerk who wants to make sure everyone--especially his wife--remembers that he's the head of his home.  I think I'm beginning to respect "that guy"--those men who have cared enough to stand for what they believe.     Let me be clear that I am referring to head coverings for women (those old enough to leave them on...)  DURING CORPORATE WORSHIP.  I am not advocating head coverings at all times.  Though I see nothing necessarily wrong that practice, I don't see any command for it either.   ...

Paedocommunion: Consistent Covenantalism or Anti-Confessionalism?

    Being raised as a paedocommunionist (that means our kids get to eat Jesus, too), I have always been amazed by how passionately credocommunionists (that means their kids don't get to eat Jesus until they articulate a "credible" profession of faith) dislike the practice.  I would think that they could look at paedocommunion and at least respect it as an attempt to live out Covenant Theology in a consistent way.  Instead, paedocommunionists have been widely viewed as being on the fringe of the fringe (yes, that far) of Reformed Theology.  I like to think that I have been able to agree-to-disagree in an amicable way with my credocommunionist friends.  However, I will admit that being discounted as "unconfessional" (trust me, I've been called worse) has made many paedocommunionists (you'd have to ask my friends whether or not that applies to me) act in a manner that lacks Christian grace.     So, the question remains, is paedocommunion a view hel...