Skip to main content

Three Thoughts on Aaron Hernandez

I wrote a post about Aaron Hernandez a little while back, but due to new details, I'd like to expand on it.  If you go to the comments section of that article, you will find many cynical remarks from non-christians/atheists regarding the possibility of Aaron Hernandez being forgiven.  It's sort of your classic "Hitler-could've-been-saved-means-you're-wrong" argument.  Here were my three responses:

1) If there is no God, then murder is simply a part of the evolutionary process whereby the strong subdue the weak.  Survival of the fittest, right?  Murder would, in fact, not only being amoral, but it would actually be the greatest "good"!  It would be the epitome of what natural processes are accomplishing in our world.  In order to use the argument that grace makes our system morally nonsensical, you have to assume morality.

2) God can forgive anyone.  The point of grace is that you don't deserve it.  Jesus told his disciples that those who are forgiven more appreciate it more.  This is not a license to sin, but a call to recognize that God's ability to forgive is not dependent on the depth of our depravity.  The more sinful we were (please note the past tense there), the more His grace shines.  We can assume that Hernandez's conversion, if true, would've produced a life of repentance.  We can never know, but that shouldn't make us doubt that authentic deathbed confessions are possible.

3) You deserve hell as much as Aaron Hernandez does.  Have you ever done anything you would admit is wrong?  Only extreme moral relativists would deny that they have.  If you have done something wrong, you had better hope that God could forgive Hernandez, because it would take as much grace to forgive you as it would to forgive him.  Not all sins are equal, but all are worthy of damnation.  A thief can't argue that he shouldn't be punished for his crime simply because he is not a murderer or a rapist.  Being "not as bad" as your brother, neighbor, or uncle won't stand up before God on the final day of judgment.

Obviously, no one but God knows Aaron Hernandez's heart.  These new details could tell a tale of either true remorse or unfathomable spiritual darkness.  It's hard to tell.  All I know is that God can work in the heart of a murderer as easily as He can work in the hearts of us "regular" sinners.
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

4 Reasons I Affirm Paedocommunion

If you have interacted with me on social media, you know that I have always been outspoken on the issue of Paedocommunion .  It is a theological position and a liturgical practice about which I am passionate.  Having been raised, and having raised my children, at the Table, I cannot imagine attending a church that didn't allow PC.  I hope that when I am old and gray, I will still be an advocate for bringing little children to the Sacrament. Throughout the 12 years that I have had this blog, I have written scattered thoughts on the topic, but it appears that I have never written a concise summary of my reasons for affirming PC.  I was thoroughly convinced that I had, but I can't seem to locate it, so I guess I never did.  So, to rectify the omission, here are four reasons I hold to PC. 1) Paedocommunion is Biblical.   Any discussion of the topic should start here, and I would hope that both sides of the debate would make this assertion.  However, l...
Post a Comment
Read more

1 Corinthians, the Covenant Hermeneutic, & Paedocommunion

As an adherent to Paedocommunion  (hereafter PC), I have always found it painfully ironic that Credocommunionists use 1 Corinthians 11 to withhold children (among others) from the Table.  One can imagine St. Paul shaking his head as he watches theologians using his discussion of unity at the Table to divide the body at the Table.  You're missing the point! he would say in exasperation.  Not only does 1 Corinthians 11 not forbid PC; I would go so far as to say that there is no better defense of PC in the New Testament than the epistle of 1 Corinthians. Credocommunionist logic is pretty straightforward.  1 Corinthians 11:28 says, "Let a person examine himself, then, and so eat of the bread and drink of the cup."  If, they argue, one is unable to fulfill the exhortation to examine himself, then he may not eat of the bread and drink of the cup.  This is a pretty logical deduction, right? Credobaptists would adamantly agree.  Acts 2:38 says, "Repe...
Post a Comment
Read more

The Real Presence & Paedocommunion: A Deeper Rift Between Reformed Churches

You're going back to Rome! Theological disagreements within the Reformed world, especially those of the last half century, often devolve into these sorts of accusations.  As controversialists like Doug Wilson and Peter Leithart began to break away from the larger conservative Presbyterian and Reformed denominations, it became clear that the rift was deeper than semantics and systematic minutiae.  Much like the Reformation four centuries before, the Table was a primary point of conflict.   What does it mean?  Who may partake?  What do we call it?    These questions, along with a few more, divided Reformed brethren as the physical elements of our religion reflected deeper conflicts.  Good men began to understand that the problem wasn't just in our logos, but in our pathos and ethos, as well. Paedocommunion (hereafter PC) has been one of the hottest points of contention.  PC has always been normal to me as I grew up with it.  I underst...
Post a Comment
Read more