Skip to main content

Three Thoughts on Aaron Hernandez

I wrote a post about Aaron Hernandez a little while back, but due to new details, I'd like to expand on it.  If you go to the comments section of that article, you will find many cynical remarks from non-christians/atheists regarding the possibility of Aaron Hernandez being forgiven.  It's sort of your classic "Hitler-could've-been-saved-means-you're-wrong" argument.  Here were my three responses:

1) If there is no God, then murder is simply a part of the evolutionary process whereby the strong subdue the weak.  Survival of the fittest, right?  Murder would, in fact, not only being amoral, but it would actually be the greatest "good"!  It would be the epitome of what natural processes are accomplishing in our world.  In order to use the argument that grace makes our system morally nonsensical, you have to assume morality.

2) God can forgive anyone.  The point of grace is that you don't deserve it.  Jesus told his disciples that those who are forgiven more appreciate it more.  This is not a license to sin, but a call to recognize that God's ability to forgive is not dependent on the depth of our depravity.  The more sinful we were (please note the past tense there), the more His grace shines.  We can assume that Hernandez's conversion, if true, would've produced a life of repentance.  We can never know, but that shouldn't make us doubt that authentic deathbed confessions are possible.

3) You deserve hell as much as Aaron Hernandez does.  Have you ever done anything you would admit is wrong?  Only extreme moral relativists would deny that they have.  If you have done something wrong, you had better hope that God could forgive Hernandez, because it would take as much grace to forgive you as it would to forgive him.  Not all sins are equal, but all are worthy of damnation.  A thief can't argue that he shouldn't be punished for his crime simply because he is not a murderer or a rapist.  Being "not as bad" as your brother, neighbor, or uncle won't stand up before God on the final day of judgment.

Obviously, no one but God knows Aaron Hernandez's heart.  These new details could tell a tale of either true remorse or unfathomable spiritual darkness.  It's hard to tell.  All I know is that God can work in the heart of a murderer as easily as He can work in the hearts of us "regular" sinners.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

4 Reasons I Affirm Paedocommunion

If you have interacted with me on social media, you know that I have always been outspoken on the issue of Paedocommunion .  It is a theological position and a liturgical practice about which I am passionate.  Having been raised, and having raised my children, at the Table, I cannot imagine attending a church that didn't allow PC.  I hope that when I am old and gray, I will still be an advocate for bringing little children to the Sacrament. Throughout the 12 years that I have had this blog, I have written scattered thoughts on the topic, but it appears that I have never written a concise summary of my reasons for affirming PC.  I was thoroughly convinced that I had, but I can't seem to locate it, so I guess I never did.  So, to rectify the omission, here are four reasons I hold to PC. 1) Paedocommunion is Biblical.   Any discussion of the topic should start here, and I would hope that both sides of the debate would make this assertion.  However, let me clarify what I mean when

1 Corinthians, the Covenant Hermeneutic, & Paedocommunion

As an adherent to Paedocommunion  (hereafter PC), I have always found it painfully ironic that Credocommunionists use 1 Corinthians 11 to withhold children (among others) from the Table.  One can imagine St. Paul shaking his head as he watches theologians using his discussion of unity at the Table to divide the body at the Table.  You're missing the point! he would say in exasperation.  Not only does 1 Corinthians 11 not forbid PC; I would go so far as to say that there is no better defense of PC in the New Testament than the epistle of 1 Corinthians. Credocommunionist logic is pretty straightforward.  1 Corinthians 11:28 says, "Let a person examine himself, then, and so eat of the bread and drink of the cup."  If, they argue, one is unable to fulfill the exhortation to examine himself, then he may not eat of the bread and drink of the cup.  This is a pretty logical deduction, right? Credobaptists would adamantly agree.  Acts 2:38 says, "Repent and be baptized...&quo

Why do you go to church on Sunday?

Why do you go to church on Sunday?  I would assume there are many reasons, but what is the primary reason that you get up on a cold, snowy Sunday morning and get your butt to church?  Further, why has the Church of Jesus Christ consistently gathered together on Sundays (among other days) for the last 2000 years? Throughout my 34 years of church attendance I would have proffered a variety of answers to that question.  As a child I'm sure I went to church because I had to, to see my cousins (who happened to be my best friends), to get bread and wine (weekly communion for the win), etc.  As my faith matured in adulthood these reasons remained, hopefully deepening, but to them were added concepts like rest and theological training. As I moved into Anglicanism I was struck by the deliberate focus on worship .  Why do Christians gather on Sunday morning?  To worship God!  Are teaching and fellowship important?  Absolutely!  Are they aspects of worship?  Certainly!  Is either the primary