Skip to main content

The Role-Reversing Kingdom or The Ultimate Parable

Christians spend entirely too much time trying to make the Gospel less offensive than it is. We try to synthesize our faith with our culture so that it will be more palatable, but our Savior came declaring a Kingdom that makes demands on your lives.  One of the fundamental Kingdom principles He proclaimed is that "the last will be first, and the first last."  Christians are so familiar with Jesus's many aphorisms that we forget just how earth-shaking they are, and, subsequently, we fail to live them out as consistently as we should.  They're wise sayings, yes, but they are so much more than that.  They are operational principles for life.  

When we read Jesus's teaching, especially the Sermon on the Mount (Matthew 5-7), we see that this Kingdom He proclaims reverses roles.  It flips the carnal world on it's head.  The Kingdom of Heaven plays by different rules than this world.  The world says that it's a dog-eat-dog world.  Jesus says to bear your cross and follow Him.  Jesus says to do unto others as you would have them do unto you.  The world says to do unto others before they do unto you.  Jesus came to establish a Kingdom whose citizens turn the other cheek and love their enemies.


Nowhere is this contrast (between Christ's Kingdom and the world) more apparent than in the way that authority is a) gained and b) utilized.  When Jesus was preparing His disciples to continue the mission after His Ascension, He said, "But he who is greatest among you will be your servant. Whoever exalts himself will be humbled, and whoever humbles himself will be exalted."  Jesus wanted the Apostles to know that the key to power in His Kingdom is not ruthless self-advancement, but service.  If you would rule others, you must begin by demonstrating humility.  Any power you are then given is delegated to you for the express purpose of blessing your fellow man, particularly your brethren in Christ.  


If you study history at all, you will soon find that it is marked by the blight of aggression.  No matter what century (ours included) or culture (yep, ours included) you explore, you'll find that kingdoms have come and gone as one regime asserts its will on its predecessor and/or the populace.  Sometimes the means are barbaric and bloody, while other times the tactics are more democratic, but the motivators are always pride, lust, and greed.  We see several such kingdoms rise and fall in the centuries leading up to the Advent of Christ.  The Babylonian, Medo-Persian, Greek, and Roman Kingdoms epitomize the totalitarian mindset of the world, but then another Kingdom enters the scene and changes things (see Daniel 2). This Kingdom is not of this world.  It is inaugurated, not by brute strength or superior military strategy, but by the death of her King, the ultimate parable.  If you would be a citizen of this Kingdom, you must follow His example, humbling yourself and laying down your life for your friends.  

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

4 Reasons I Affirm Paedocommunion

If you have interacted with me on social media, you know that I have always been outspoken on the issue of Paedocommunion .  It is a theological position and a liturgical practice about which I am passionate.  Having been raised, and having raised my children, at the Table, I cannot imagine attending a church that didn't allow PC.  I hope that when I am old and gray, I will still be an advocate for bringing little children to the Sacrament. Throughout the 12 years that I have had this blog, I have written scattered thoughts on the topic, but it appears that I have never written a concise summary of my reasons for affirming PC.  I was thoroughly convinced that I had, but I can't seem to locate it, so I guess I never did.  So, to rectify the omission, here are four reasons I hold to PC. 1) Paedocommunion is Biblical.   Any discussion of the topic should start here, and I would hope that both sides of the debate would make this assertion.  However, l...

1 Corinthians, the Covenant Hermeneutic, & Paedocommunion

As an adherent to Paedocommunion  (hereafter PC), I have always found it painfully ironic that Credocommunionists use 1 Corinthians 11 to withhold children (among others) from the Table.  One can imagine St. Paul shaking his head as he watches theologians using his discussion of unity at the Table to divide the body at the Table.  You're missing the point! he would say in exasperation.  Not only does 1 Corinthians 11 not forbid PC; I would go so far as to say that there is no better defense of PC in the New Testament than the epistle of 1 Corinthians. Credocommunionist logic is pretty straightforward.  1 Corinthians 11:28 says, "Let a person examine himself, then, and so eat of the bread and drink of the cup."  If, they argue, one is unable to fulfill the exhortation to examine himself, then he may not eat of the bread and drink of the cup.  This is a pretty logical deduction, right? Credobaptists would adamantly agree.  Acts 2:38 says, "Repe...

The Real Presence & Paedocommunion: A Deeper Rift Between Reformed Churches

You're going back to Rome! Theological disagreements within the Reformed world, especially those of the last half century, often devolve into these sorts of accusations.  As controversialists like Doug Wilson and Peter Leithart began to break away from the larger conservative Presbyterian and Reformed denominations, it became clear that the rift was deeper than semantics and systematic minutiae.  Much like the Reformation four centuries before, the Table was a primary point of conflict.   What does it mean?  Who may partake?  What do we call it?    These questions, along with a few more, divided Reformed brethren as the physical elements of our religion reflected deeper conflicts.  Good men began to understand that the problem wasn't just in our logos, but in our pathos and ethos, as well. Paedocommunion (hereafter PC) has been one of the hottest points of contention.  PC has always been normal to me as I grew up with it.  I underst...