Skip to main content

Thirsting for the Word of God

What would happen if you could never read your Bible ever again?  What would you do if reading the Bible suddenly became illegal and Bibles were confiscated as contraband?  What would you do if you were deprived of the Word of God?  We humans tend to undervalue that to which we have constant access.  Most Americans have the Internet in their hands.  We can travel around the world in a matter of days.  We can communicate with people around the world instantly.  These possibilities are simply amazing, yet we take them for granted.  We get so used to the novelties of life--technology, food, transportation, etc.--that we take for granted those things for which others would, quite literally, die.  

 Familiarity breeds contempt, they say, and divine revelation is no exception.  The number of copies of the Bible in existence is difficult to fathom, and yet, even Christians, those who claim to love and follow Jesus Christ, fail to appreciate the revealed will of God and the privilege that it is to possess it in a tangible way.  There are disagreements as to exactly how God's revelation works and what form it takes, but every Christian should be able to affirm and rejoice that God has spoken to His creatures. We must put away our modern sense of entitlement and recognize that this is a mystifying and unspeakable blessing.  Consider Amos 8:11-12: 
"Behold, the days come," says the Lord Yahweh (GOD), "that I will send a famine in the land, not a famine of bread, nor a thirst for water, but of hearing the words of Yahweh (the LORD).  They will wander from sea to sea, and from the north even to the east; they will run back and forth to seek the word of Yahweh (the LORD), and will not find it." (WEB)
Would this sort of famine even bother us?  God promises judgement in the form of taking His Word from His people, but I doubt that the majority of the modern Church would even mind.  Heck, half the churches in America could probably proceed unaffected if the Bible were censured!  We must have a thirst for the Word of God.  We must develop an unquenchable appetite for the revelation of Almighty God.  We must fear a famine of the bread that sustains our physical life far less than we fear a famine of the Bread of Life!  After all, man shall not live by bread alone, but by every word that comes from the mouth of God.  

 The Word of God is the sustenance of the Christian life.  It is the milk that enables us to grow up into salvation.  The increasing availability of the Word is one of the greatest legacies of 20th-Century Christianity, but we have squandered this inheritance.  What should be a blessing has become a curse through our abuse, and, I fear, we will reap the fitting punishment.  If we will ignore the Word, then God will take it from us.  Let us thirst for His Word.  Let us cherish it.  Above all else, let us do all we can to read it and to hear it preached.

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

4 Reasons I Affirm Paedocommunion

If you have interacted with me on social media, you know that I have always been outspoken on the issue of Paedocommunion .  It is a theological position and a liturgical practice about which I am passionate.  Having been raised, and having raised my children, at the Table, I cannot imagine attending a church that didn't allow PC.  I hope that when I am old and gray, I will still be an advocate for bringing little children to the Sacrament. Throughout the 12 years that I have had this blog, I have written scattered thoughts on the topic, but it appears that I have never written a concise summary of my reasons for affirming PC.  I was thoroughly convinced that I had, but I can't seem to locate it, so I guess I never did.  So, to rectify the omission, here are four reasons I hold to PC. 1) Paedocommunion is Biblical.   Any discussion of the topic should start here, and I would hope that both sides of the debate would make this assertion.  However, let me clarify what I mean when
Post a Comment
Read more

1 Corinthians, the Covenant Hermeneutic, & Paedocommunion

As an adherent to Paedocommunion  (hereafter PC), I have always found it painfully ironic that Credocommunionists use 1 Corinthians 11 to withhold children (among others) from the Table.  One can imagine St. Paul shaking his head as he watches theologians using his discussion of unity at the Table to divide the body at the Table.  You're missing the point! he would say in exasperation.  Not only does 1 Corinthians 11 not forbid PC; I would go so far as to say that there is no better defense of PC in the New Testament than the epistle of 1 Corinthians. Credocommunionist logic is pretty straightforward.  1 Corinthians 11:28 says, "Let a person examine himself, then, and so eat of the bread and drink of the cup."  If, they argue, one is unable to fulfill the exhortation to examine himself, then he may not eat of the bread and drink of the cup.  This is a pretty logical deduction, right? Credobaptists would adamantly agree.  Acts 2:38 says, "Repent and be baptized...&quo
Post a Comment
Read more

Why do you go to church on Sunday?

Why do you go to church on Sunday?  I would assume there are many reasons, but what is the primary reason that you get up on a cold, snowy Sunday morning and get your butt to church?  Further, why has the Church of Jesus Christ consistently gathered together on Sundays (among other days) for the last 2000 years? Throughout my 34 years of church attendance I would have proffered a variety of answers to that question.  As a child I'm sure I went to church because I had to, to see my cousins (who happened to be my best friends), to get bread and wine (weekly communion for the win), etc.  As my faith matured in adulthood these reasons remained, hopefully deepening, but to them were added concepts like rest and theological training. As I moved into Anglicanism I was struck by the deliberate focus on worship .  Why do Christians gather on Sunday morning?  To worship God!  Are teaching and fellowship important?  Absolutely!  Are they aspects of worship?  Certainly!  Is either the primary
Post a Comment
Read more