Skip to main content

Truth Seeking?

It's very "in" to question everything.  In fact, people take great pride in refusing to accept at face value what their parents, teachers, and religious leaders tell them.  Now, there is definitely something admirable in this.  Standing for truth in a sea of lies is difficult and respectable.  Having the intellectual honesty to believe what you believe despite what you wish to believe is rare.  There is a point, however, at which we must all confess our own limitations.  No one has all the information. We are finite creatures with finite minds with which to process the finite information we do have.  At some point we must come face-to-face with this finitude.  Sometimes the truth is beyond an individual's ability to grasp it and there's nothing immoral or shameful in admitting that.

Such modesty is not nearly as popular as this "question everything" attitude.  Much of the time the underlying issue is really just pride.  People see themselves as seekers of the truth, but they're really just blinded by and to their own arrogance.  They project a persona of intellectual honesty, but they really just refuse to be told anything that disagrees with their own preconceptions.  Case in point: the Internet.  There are so many people out there voicing opinions and spouting "facts" when they should be reading books and listening to their elders.  Trust me, I've been there and done that (the former, not the latter).

I often wonder why my generation refuses to listen to our elders.  Is it the Internet?  Probably.  Is it the timeless impertinence of youth?  Of course.  There's something more though--something deeper. It's called human depravity and it transcends my generation and this era.  The age of information is merely exacerbating the pride problem that exists in the human heart.  Access to information and the ease with which it can be disseminated encourage us to reject the advice and wisdom of those who have actually experienced real life.

My point is this.  It's great to have a curious mind.  It's great to thirst and search for truth.  It's good to investigate things personally and to have well-informed opinions, but you can't call it truth-seeking if you think you already have all the truth.  That's called having an ego.

That's just my two cents.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

4 Reasons I Affirm Paedocommunion

If you have interacted with me on social media, you know that I have always been outspoken on the issue of Paedocommunion .  It is a theological position and a liturgical practice about which I am passionate.  Having been raised, and having raised my children, at the Table, I cannot imagine attending a church that didn't allow PC.  I hope that when I am old and gray, I will still be an advocate for bringing little children to the Sacrament. Throughout the 12 years that I have had this blog, I have written scattered thoughts on the topic, but it appears that I have never written a concise summary of my reasons for affirming PC.  I was thoroughly convinced that I had, but I can't seem to locate it, so I guess I never did.  So, to rectify the omission, here are four reasons I hold to PC. 1) Paedocommunion is Biblical.   Any discussion of the topic should start here, and I would hope that both sides of the debate would make this assertion.  However, let me clarify what I mean when

1 Corinthians, the Covenant Hermeneutic, & Paedocommunion

As an adherent to Paedocommunion  (hereafter PC), I have always found it painfully ironic that Credocommunionists use 1 Corinthians 11 to withhold children (among others) from the Table.  One can imagine St. Paul shaking his head as he watches theologians using his discussion of unity at the Table to divide the body at the Table.  You're missing the point! he would say in exasperation.  Not only does 1 Corinthians 11 not forbid PC; I would go so far as to say that there is no better defense of PC in the New Testament than the epistle of 1 Corinthians. Credocommunionist logic is pretty straightforward.  1 Corinthians 11:28 says, "Let a person examine himself, then, and so eat of the bread and drink of the cup."  If, they argue, one is unable to fulfill the exhortation to examine himself, then he may not eat of the bread and drink of the cup.  This is a pretty logical deduction, right? Credobaptists would adamantly agree.  Acts 2:38 says, "Repent and be baptized...&quo

Why do you go to church on Sunday?

Why do you go to church on Sunday?  I would assume there are many reasons, but what is the primary reason that you get up on a cold, snowy Sunday morning and get your butt to church?  Further, why has the Church of Jesus Christ consistently gathered together on Sundays (among other days) for the last 2000 years? Throughout my 34 years of church attendance I would have proffered a variety of answers to that question.  As a child I'm sure I went to church because I had to, to see my cousins (who happened to be my best friends), to get bread and wine (weekly communion for the win), etc.  As my faith matured in adulthood these reasons remained, hopefully deepening, but to them were added concepts like rest and theological training. As I moved into Anglicanism I was struck by the deliberate focus on worship .  Why do Christians gather on Sunday morning?  To worship God!  Are teaching and fellowship important?  Absolutely!  Are they aspects of worship?  Certainly!  Is either the primary