Skip to main content

The 2016 Election and the God of Mammon

    But if we don't vote for Trump, our economy is going to fall apart?  Does that sound familiar, friends?  Yes, it does, and that's because it is the resounding chorus of fear that has been emanating from middle class Americans afraid of losing their lifestyles.  Now, to be clear, I don't necessarily want our economy to fall apart, nor do I think it's wrong to pray that God would prosper our nation through Godly leadership.  I am not prepared, however, to compromise my principles to secure my financial freedom.  It's the same sort of logic I use when, say, choosing not to be a thief or a drug-dealing pimp--it's wrong to get money in immoral ways.  Voting for a man like Trump (who is basically a drug-dealing pimp/thief) because it makes economic sense is certainly not as egregious as pimpin' hoes or knocking off banks, but the same principle comes into play.  Is it okay to compromise our principles for the sake of financial stability/advancement?

    The obvious answer that any conscious Christian would give is a resounding "No!"  But when you make a choice, ask yourself, "What is the basis of my choice?"  When you pick one of the names on that ballot, what is your thought process?  Are you choosing out of fear and what is that fear?  What is your ultimate purpose in voting for that candidate?  You see, I won't be voting for Donald Trump for the same reason (really, one among many) that I won't be voting for Hillary Clinton--or Gary Johnson, for that matter.  All three candidates share one thing in common.  They are all dedicated Mammonites.  They are religious Mammonites.  They believe in, trust in, worship, and live to advance the cause of Mammon.  What is mammon, you ask?  The term, familiar to many Christians as found in Matthew 6:24, is somewhat ambiguous.  It is often translated "money" or "wealth," but the meaning is deeper than that.  Many scholars believe it is related to the term "aman," which means "to trust."  Over time it developed this connotation of reliance upon wealth or greed.  So when Jesus speaks of serving Mammon, He is talking about relating to physical wealth in a religious way.  He personifies it as a deity because money becomes very religious.  It demands our time.  It demands our energy.  It owns our hearts and controls our souls.  It determines the decisions that we make and the way that we live our lives.

    Here's the thing--Jesus dichotomizes the true God and this false god known as Mammon.  You simply cannot serve God and Mammon.  It's not inadvisable; it's impossible!  Jesus tells us that we cannot serve God if we are serving Mammon because both demand our entire person--heart, soul, mind, and strength.  Personally, I do not like to vote for those who do not adhere to my religion (how can I choose someone to represent me who does not share those beliefs that form the foundation of who I am and how I live my life?).  Even so, I'd rather vote for a Mormon or a Muslim than a nominal Christian who is really just a Mammonite.  I know that adherents to either of those other two religions have principles, whatever they may be, that transcend materialistic hedonism.  What I know about Trump and Hillary is that they both serve money.  That means they're unpredictable and selfish. They will make decisions based upon the almighty dollar instead of the Almighty God!  Has either candidate given us a reason to doubt that?  Hardly.  In fact, both of consistently reinforced my assertion throughout the duration of their respective careers.

    Vote for Donald Trump, if you want.  If you love our country and want to see her prosper, I don't fault you.  But, whatever you do, I ask you to weigh your motives.  Why are you voting for the candidate for whom you are voting?  Are you voting for him/her because you sincerely believe he/she will lead this country well?  Or are you doing so because you're afraid of losing your financial affluence and stability?  Only you know your heart.  Just remember the words of Jesus Christ:

No one can serve two masters, for either he will hate the one and love the other; or else he will be devoted to one and despise the other. You can't serve both God and Mammon. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

"Father, Forgive Them"

“Father, forgive them, for they know not what they do.” Forgiveness is hard.  Forgiveness is really, really hard. It’s difficult to forgive others who have genuinely harmed or offended us.   It’s easy to say , “I forgive you,” but it’s extremely difficult to feel it–to make peace in our hearts with the injustices that others have perpetrated against us. It just doesn’t feel right.  Sin should be punished!  Wrongs should be righted!  Right?! It’s difficult to forgive others when they ask for it.  It’s even more difficult to forgive them when they haven’t asked for it–when they don’t even recognize what they’ve done to hurt us. As our Savior hung upon His Cross, He asked the Father to forgive those nearby–those who were unwittingly contributing to the greatest injustice in the history of the world. These thieves, soldiers, and standers-by had no idea what was happening.  They had no idea that the jealousy of the Jews had placed Christ on that Cross...

5 Reasons I Want my Wife to Start Wearing a Head Covering during Corporate Worship

    Of late, the issue of head coverings has come up in my circle.  Okay...my cousin and I have been discussing it, but the point is, the issue has been bouncing around my head for the past few days.  It is a topic that I have avoided for some time.  Every time I read through 1 Corinthians, I would tell myself, "We'll get around to that."  The reality is that I didn't want to be "that guy"...that guy who people view as a chauvinistic jerk who wants to make sure everyone--especially his wife--remembers that he's the head of his home.  I think I'm beginning to respect "that guy"--those men who have cared enough to stand for what they believe.     Let me be clear that I am referring to head coverings for women (those old enough to leave them on...)  DURING CORPORATE WORSHIP.  I am not advocating head coverings at all times.  Though I see nothing necessarily wrong that practice, I don't see any command for it either.   ...

The Real Presence & Paedocommunion: A Deeper Rift Between Reformed Churches

You're going back to Rome! Theological disagreements within the Reformed world, especially those of the last half century, often devolve into these sorts of accusations.  As controversialists like Doug Wilson and Peter Leithart began to break away from the larger conservative Presbyterian and Reformed denominations, it became clear that the rift was deeper than semantics and systematic minutiae.  Much like the Reformation four centuries before, the Table was a primary point of conflict.   What does it mean?  Who may partake?  What do we call it?    These questions, along with a few more, divided Reformed brethren as the physical elements of our religion reflected deeper conflicts.  Good men began to understand that the problem wasn't just in our logos, but in our pathos and ethos, as well. Paedocommunion (hereafter PC) has been one of the hottest points of contention.  PC has always been normal to me as I grew up with it.  I underst...