Skip to main content

YOLO and an Age of Hedonism

    I'm happy to say that the term "YOLO" is used far less frequently now than it was a few years ago. Unfortunately the spirit of YOLO lives on, and, as it is an attitude that has been around for millennia, I doubt it will ever truly be extinguished.  For those of you who don't know, YOLO means "You Only Live Once."  In those simple two syllables is captured an entire mindset--a worldview, if you will. YOLO communicates the belief that life is short and unpredictable, so you might as well do whatever the heck you want while you're here.  We're all worm food after we die, right?  Why conform to social norms and pointless responsibilities when you can do drugs, have sex, and stay out till sunrise? If we're all just animals, then why not act like it?  The American Dream and its work ethic have been replaced by hedonism and fatalism.

    This type of thinking has permeated our culture in this irreligious, post-modern age.  Our culture, especially the entertainment industry, perpetuates this attitude zealously.  This attitude has particularly infected the millennial generation.  Things like keeping a job and paying your bills seem old-fashioned and narrow-minded to a generation that wants to fill every moment of every day with entertainment and pleasure.  It's sort of ironic, actually.  The older generations, the ones that complain so much about the millennials, are the ones that have provided the ideological foundation for it.  They have taught their children that religion is optional (at best), morality is flexible, and truth is relative. Millennials, in turn, have asked, "What's the point?" What's the point of doing the right thing if it doesn't really matter?  What's the point of being responsible if nothing lies beyond the grave? Millennials are being consistent.  Why work if nothing really matters?  Why not eat, drink, and be merry?  Additionally,  past generations have idolized wealth as an end to itself.  Millennials have largely found wealth empty and shallow.  Millennials would rather ride tandem bikes and plant herb gardens than work 9-to-5 jobs and live in middle-class condos.

    How empty the "YOLO" lifestyle is!  I reject it for two reasons.  Firstly, I believe in right and wrong. I believe that we are not simply animals, but sentient, moral creatures created by God to serve Him.  I believe in the afterlife.  If you only live once, you'll die twice (Revelation 20:14).  These two worldviews are inherently at odds.  Unfortunately the Church has largely imbibed this "YOLO" attitude nonetheless.

    Secondly, I reject this existence because I find it to be severely lacking.  Don't get me wrong--I like to have fun, but if I only have one life to live, why would I want to spent it hungover?  If my years on this Earth are all that I have, I would rather extend them and use them productively.  I'd rather spend what precious time I have learning about the world, helping others, and maintaining my health than developing cirrhosis and burning bridges.  I would rather be creative and expand my horizons than live a life of self-destruction.  Is it really enjoyable to harm your body?  Is it really satisfying to abandon family and alienate friends?  Are addictions and STDs really that cool?  I don't think so.  Instead of encouraging carefree carelessness, YOLO should motivate us to live careful, intentional lives.  Even from a non-religious perspective, that would be a much "fuller" life than dying alone with a bottle in one hand and a needle in your arm.

    Ultimately, it is both a fear of judgment and a longing for communion with my Creator that guide my life choices.  There is meaning in the Universe.  There is a reason that we are on this planet.  But even if I didn't believe that, I would still rather live a long, healthy life full of family, friends, and books than live a meaningless, YOLO existence.

   

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

4 Reasons I Affirm Paedocommunion

If you have interacted with me on social media, you know that I have always been outspoken on the issue of Paedocommunion .  It is a theological position and a liturgical practice about which I am passionate.  Having been raised, and having raised my children, at the Table, I cannot imagine attending a church that didn't allow PC.  I hope that when I am old and gray, I will still be an advocate for bringing little children to the Sacrament. Throughout the 12 years that I have had this blog, I have written scattered thoughts on the topic, but it appears that I have never written a concise summary of my reasons for affirming PC.  I was thoroughly convinced that I had, but I can't seem to locate it, so I guess I never did.  So, to rectify the omission, here are four reasons I hold to PC. 1) Paedocommunion is Biblical.   Any discussion of the topic should start here, and I would hope that both sides of the debate would make this assertion.  However, let me clarify what I mean when

1 Corinthians, the Covenant Hermeneutic, & Paedocommunion

As an adherent to Paedocommunion  (hereafter PC), I have always found it painfully ironic that Credocommunionists use 1 Corinthians 11 to withhold children (among others) from the Table.  One can imagine St. Paul shaking his head as he watches theologians using his discussion of unity at the Table to divide the body at the Table.  You're missing the point! he would say in exasperation.  Not only does 1 Corinthians 11 not forbid PC; I would go so far as to say that there is no better defense of PC in the New Testament than the epistle of 1 Corinthians. Credocommunionist logic is pretty straightforward.  1 Corinthians 11:28 says, "Let a person examine himself, then, and so eat of the bread and drink of the cup."  If, they argue, one is unable to fulfill the exhortation to examine himself, then he may not eat of the bread and drink of the cup.  This is a pretty logical deduction, right? Credobaptists would adamantly agree.  Acts 2:38 says, "Repent and be baptized...&quo

Why do you go to church on Sunday?

Why do you go to church on Sunday?  I would assume there are many reasons, but what is the primary reason that you get up on a cold, snowy Sunday morning and get your butt to church?  Further, why has the Church of Jesus Christ consistently gathered together on Sundays (among other days) for the last 2000 years? Throughout my 34 years of church attendance I would have proffered a variety of answers to that question.  As a child I'm sure I went to church because I had to, to see my cousins (who happened to be my best friends), to get bread and wine (weekly communion for the win), etc.  As my faith matured in adulthood these reasons remained, hopefully deepening, but to them were added concepts like rest and theological training. As I moved into Anglicanism I was struck by the deliberate focus on worship .  Why do Christians gather on Sunday morning?  To worship God!  Are teaching and fellowship important?  Absolutely!  Are they aspects of worship?  Certainly!  Is either the primary