Skip to main content

The Awe of God in Job

    I've been reading through the book of Job lately, and I've been struck by the unifying theme--awe of God.  Now, I'm sure I'm not the first to notice this, but I feel like modern interpretations of the book of Job focus on Job and his miserable comforters.  As is the case with most modern theology, we make this tale very anthropocentric.  It's all about how we need to stay the course in troubled times or how we need to remember that people going through tough times are not always sinners. These applications are good to make, of course, but they are not the main focus of the narrative.  The main point is that God is ineffably greater than His Creation.

    We see this theme in a few different ways.  Firstly, on several occasions we see different speakers express the same sentiment--that man could not possibly be found just in the sight of God. The most telling example is Job 9:2 where Job himself says this.  It is telling because he spends most of the book asserting his own innocence/righteousness, but even he knows that he is not perfect before God. He knows that his righteousness would melt before the presence of God.

    Secondly, we see this theme in the descriptions of God's character and power throughout the book. Especially emphasized are God's creative power and transcendence.  In Job 11:7 Zophar asks Job if he can find out the deeps things of God or find his limits.  Job 9 describes how God created the heavenly bodies and the Earth.  Numerous other examples could be listed.

    Thirdly and finally, God Himself steps in at the end and reminds everyone of who He is.  In Job 40 we see Job humbled and silenced in the presence of God.  God challenges Job to correct or inform Him.  He directs Job's attention to the Creation, citing beasts like Leviathan and Behemoth, which displays His creative power.  After Job is thoroughly humbled, God turns His attention to Job's miserable comforters.  The effect is the same.  The devil, whose role is so prominent in the first part of the book, is nowhere to be found.  God dominates the climax and resolution of the narrative.

    We seem to have lost this awe of God.  There was a time in this country when even unbelievers would be reverent when it came to the things of God.  Now irreverence and antagonism towards religion, Christianity in particular, are commonplace.  That is not unexpected, however, coming from unbelievers.  What is more disturbing is the lack of awe that Christians display.  This is evident in our worship and our attitude toward the ordinances of God, but it is most apparent in our attitude towards sin.  Is there any sin we cannot excuse?  The Church in America has compromised time and again to the point that our standards for holiness are pitiful.  We allow the world to dictate to us what is right and wrong, what is appropriate and inappropriate.  Addressing this issue is complicated, but recapturing this awe of God, I believe, would go a long way towards restoring a concern for piety and holiness in the American Church.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

4 Reasons I Affirm Paedocommunion

If you have interacted with me on social media, you know that I have always been outspoken on the issue of Paedocommunion .  It is a theological position and a liturgical practice about which I am passionate.  Having been raised, and having raised my children, at the Table, I cannot imagine attending a church that didn't allow PC.  I hope that when I am old and gray, I will still be an advocate for bringing little children to the Sacrament. Throughout the 12 years that I have had this blog, I have written scattered thoughts on the topic, but it appears that I have never written a concise summary of my reasons for affirming PC.  I was thoroughly convinced that I had, but I can't seem to locate it, so I guess I never did.  So, to rectify the omission, here are four reasons I hold to PC. 1) Paedocommunion is Biblical.   Any discussion of the topic should start here, and I would hope that both sides of the debate would make this assertion.  However, let me clarify what I mean when

1 Corinthians, the Covenant Hermeneutic, & Paedocommunion

As an adherent to Paedocommunion  (hereafter PC), I have always found it painfully ironic that Credocommunionists use 1 Corinthians 11 to withhold children (among others) from the Table.  One can imagine St. Paul shaking his head as he watches theologians using his discussion of unity at the Table to divide the body at the Table.  You're missing the point! he would say in exasperation.  Not only does 1 Corinthians 11 not forbid PC; I would go so far as to say that there is no better defense of PC in the New Testament than the epistle of 1 Corinthians. Credocommunionist logic is pretty straightforward.  1 Corinthians 11:28 says, "Let a person examine himself, then, and so eat of the bread and drink of the cup."  If, they argue, one is unable to fulfill the exhortation to examine himself, then he may not eat of the bread and drink of the cup.  This is a pretty logical deduction, right? Credobaptists would adamantly agree.  Acts 2:38 says, "Repent and be baptized...&quo

Why do you go to church on Sunday?

Why do you go to church on Sunday?  I would assume there are many reasons, but what is the primary reason that you get up on a cold, snowy Sunday morning and get your butt to church?  Further, why has the Church of Jesus Christ consistently gathered together on Sundays (among other days) for the last 2000 years? Throughout my 34 years of church attendance I would have proffered a variety of answers to that question.  As a child I'm sure I went to church because I had to, to see my cousins (who happened to be my best friends), to get bread and wine (weekly communion for the win), etc.  As my faith matured in adulthood these reasons remained, hopefully deepening, but to them were added concepts like rest and theological training. As I moved into Anglicanism I was struck by the deliberate focus on worship .  Why do Christians gather on Sunday morning?  To worship God!  Are teaching and fellowship important?  Absolutely!  Are they aspects of worship?  Certainly!  Is either the primary