Skip to main content

Nepotism & America's Unofficial Aristocracy

Why have so many Americans supported a belligerent, caustic personality like Donald Trump?  Why are Evangelicals and other conservatives so eager to reelect a man with such questionable character and such a checkered past?  Why do they prefer him, and vocally so, to the alternative offered by the Democrats?

Much like the situation back in 2016, this election is clarifying many voters' primary grievance--Americans are sick of the status quo. 

And what is that status quo?  Our hidden aristocracy.

Perhaps hidden is the wrong word.  Maybe unofficial is a better word for it.  

This nation was founded upon the idea that all men are created equal.  Our revolutionary forefathers rejected the monarchy and the aristocratic society that surrounded it, eliminating class distinctions in their new land of opportunity and promise.  No longer would a person's last name be enough to grant him office or opportunity.  No longer would a House of Lords exert influence on public policy.  No longer would members of the upper crust of society be given power and influence simply because of their lineage.

Or so the history books tell us.  

The history books also tell us of families like the Adams and the Roosevelts.  Your grandparents can tell you about families like the Kennedys.  Your own memory can tell you about the Bushes and the Clintons. 

This is why America rejected Hillary Clinton.  This is why Americans are wary of Joe Biden and his privileged, infamous son.

The history of the United States, like that of essentially every other nation that has ever existed, is full of nepotism.  Nepotism is not an inherently unethical idea.  In fact, it is often a very beneficial practice.  If you trust a certain individual, you would hope that his sons, nephews, etc. are trustworthy, as well.  The close relations of trustworthy public servants should be exactly the kind of people that you would want to employ or elect, but all good things are liable to corruption, and this is disproportionately true in the civil sphere.

Nepotism becomes an issue when people are given positions and opportunities despite their lack of trustworthiness. 

Nepotism becomes an issue when politicians use their power to enrich their own families.

Nepotism becomes an issue when an individual's crimes and incompetence are excused because of who his father is.

This is what enrages so many of this nation's voters and why they have taken such a strange bed-fellow.  They would rather vote for a millionaire-turned-politician than a politician-turned-millionaire.  They would rather place their confidence in a family of rich & powerful businessmen who have entered the political arena than deal with Joe Biden and his profligate son.  Furthermore, they are sick of the mass media outlets who continue to cover up the indiscretions of the Clintons, Bidens, and other powerful families whose money and public policy they enjoy.

Americans have had enough of our unofficial aristocracy.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Real Presence & Paedocommunion: A Deeper Rift Between Reformed Churches

You're going back to Rome! Theological disagreements within the Reformed world, especially those of the last half century, often devolve into these sorts of accusations.  As controversialists like Doug Wilson and Peter Leithart began to break away from the larger conservative Presbyterian and Reformed denominations, it became clear that the rift was deeper than semantics and systematic minutiae.  Much like the Reformation four centuries before, the Table was a primary point of conflict.   What does it mean?  Who may partake?  What do we call it?    These questions, along with a few more, divided Reformed brethren as the physical elements of our religion reflected deeper conflicts.  Good men began to understand that the problem wasn't just in our logos, but in our pathos and ethos, as well. Paedocommunion (hereafter PC) has been one of the hottest points of contention.  PC has always been normal to me as I grew up with it.  I underst...

Anglicanism, Paedocommunion, & Being Reformed

I consider myself Reformed.  I was baptized as a baby in a PCA church.  I grew up in a Reformed microdenomination that allowed its member churches to subscribe to any of the Reformed confessions (we subscribed to the Three Forms of Unity).  In many ways, whether I like it or not, I still think and act like a Reformed Presbyterian.   Some, however, would seek to deny me that label.  I suspect there are many reasons for this, but paramount among them is that I hold to Paedocommunion (hereafter PC), which, for some reason, is absolutely the worst thing ever to these people.  Some would go so far as to say that PC makes me a heretic, but they all agree that I am certainly not Reformed .   My recent engagement with these opponents of PC has caused me to reflect on what it means to be Reformed and what it means to be a Christian.  This online jousting has dovetailed well with some of my recent study, particularly  An Apology of the Church...

Some Thoughts on the 2024 Election

So, we had an election earlier this week.  Perhaps you heard about it. I have done my best to remain mostly silent on political issues this time around because I have found that fixating on such matters does little for my mental or spiritual health.  Also, no one cares what I think.  Nevertheless, here are a few thoughts on our recent election. 1) I didn't vote for Donald Trump, but I'd be lying if I said I'm not glad he won.  To be clear, that says more about Kamala Harris than about Donald Trump. 2) This election seemed much cleaner--much less suspicious--than the sordid affair we had in 2020.  This election didn't feature any poll workers tallying (discovering? conjuring?) votes behind closed doors in the wee hours of the night, messy mail-in voting, or voter turnout beyond plausible expectations.  The 2020 election had me convinced that we would never see another peaceful, uncontested election, but, as contentious as things were this year, it seems like...