Skip to main content

Nepotism & America's Unofficial Aristocracy

Why have so many Americans supported a belligerent, caustic personality like Donald Trump?  Why are Evangelicals and other conservatives so eager to reelect a man with such questionable character and such a checkered past?  Why do they prefer him, and vocally so, to the alternative offered by the Democrats?

Much like the situation back in 2016, this election is clarifying many voters' primary grievance--Americans are sick of the status quo. 

And what is that status quo?  Our hidden aristocracy.

Perhaps hidden is the wrong word.  Maybe unofficial is a better word for it.  

This nation was founded upon the idea that all men are created equal.  Our revolutionary forefathers rejected the monarchy and the aristocratic society that surrounded it, eliminating class distinctions in their new land of opportunity and promise.  No longer would a person's last name be enough to grant him office or opportunity.  No longer would a House of Lords exert influence on public policy.  No longer would members of the upper crust of society be given power and influence simply because of their lineage.

Or so the history books tell us.  

The history books also tell us of families like the Adams and the Roosevelts.  Your grandparents can tell you about families like the Kennedys.  Your own memory can tell you about the Bushes and the Clintons. 

This is why America rejected Hillary Clinton.  This is why Americans are wary of Joe Biden and his privileged, infamous son.

The history of the United States, like that of essentially every other nation that has ever existed, is full of nepotism.  Nepotism is not an inherently unethical idea.  In fact, it is often a very beneficial practice.  If you trust a certain individual, you would hope that his sons, nephews, etc. are trustworthy, as well.  The close relations of trustworthy public servants should be exactly the kind of people that you would want to employ or elect, but all good things are liable to corruption, and this is disproportionately true in the civil sphere.

Nepotism becomes an issue when people are given positions and opportunities despite their lack of trustworthiness. 

Nepotism becomes an issue when politicians use their power to enrich their own families.

Nepotism becomes an issue when an individual's crimes and incompetence are excused because of who his father is.

This is what enrages so many of this nation's voters and why they have taken such a strange bed-fellow.  They would rather vote for a millionaire-turned-politician than a politician-turned-millionaire.  They would rather place their confidence in a family of rich & powerful businessmen who have entered the political arena than deal with Joe Biden and his profligate son.  Furthermore, they are sick of the mass media outlets who continue to cover up the indiscretions of the Clintons, Bidens, and other powerful families whose money and public policy they enjoy.

Americans have had enough of our unofficial aristocracy.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

4 Reasons I Affirm Paedocommunion

If you have interacted with me on social media, you know that I have always been outspoken on the issue of Paedocommunion .  It is a theological position and a liturgical practice about which I am passionate.  Having been raised, and having raised my children, at the Table, I cannot imagine attending a church that didn't allow PC.  I hope that when I am old and gray, I will still be an advocate for bringing little children to the Sacrament. Throughout the 12 years that I have had this blog, I have written scattered thoughts on the topic, but it appears that I have never written a concise summary of my reasons for affirming PC.  I was thoroughly convinced that I had, but I can't seem to locate it, so I guess I never did.  So, to rectify the omission, here are four reasons I hold to PC. 1) Paedocommunion is Biblical.   Any discussion of the topic should start here, and I would hope that both sides of the debate would make this assertion.  However, l...

1 Corinthians, the Covenant Hermeneutic, & Paedocommunion

As an adherent to Paedocommunion  (hereafter PC), I have always found it painfully ironic that Credocommunionists use 1 Corinthians 11 to withhold children (among others) from the Table.  One can imagine St. Paul shaking his head as he watches theologians using his discussion of unity at the Table to divide the body at the Table.  You're missing the point! he would say in exasperation.  Not only does 1 Corinthians 11 not forbid PC; I would go so far as to say that there is no better defense of PC in the New Testament than the epistle of 1 Corinthians. Credocommunionist logic is pretty straightforward.  1 Corinthians 11:28 says, "Let a person examine himself, then, and so eat of the bread and drink of the cup."  If, they argue, one is unable to fulfill the exhortation to examine himself, then he may not eat of the bread and drink of the cup.  This is a pretty logical deduction, right? Credobaptists would adamantly agree.  Acts 2:38 says, "Repe...

The Real Presence & Paedocommunion: A Deeper Rift Between Reformed Churches

You're going back to Rome! Theological disagreements within the Reformed world, especially those of the last half century, often devolve into these sorts of accusations.  As controversialists like Doug Wilson and Peter Leithart began to break away from the larger conservative Presbyterian and Reformed denominations, it became clear that the rift was deeper than semantics and systematic minutiae.  Much like the Reformation four centuries before, the Table was a primary point of conflict.   What does it mean?  Who may partake?  What do we call it?    These questions, along with a few more, divided Reformed brethren as the physical elements of our religion reflected deeper conflicts.  Good men began to understand that the problem wasn't just in our logos, but in our pathos and ethos, as well. Paedocommunion (hereafter PC) has been one of the hottest points of contention.  PC has always been normal to me as I grew up with it.  I underst...