Skip to main content

A Few Thoughts on Trump's @$#%hole Comments

Trump's recent comments about immigrants coming from "@$#%hole countries" has created quite a buzz.

Perhaps you've heard about it.

One can understand why the President of the United States of America referring to other countries of the world in that way might not be appreciated, and, yet, we should be careful not to misconstrue his statements.  Here are a few quick thoughts on the matter:

Firstly, Trump was absolutely wrong to say what he said.  It was wrong because he's the PotUS, and that's not very presidential, but it's also wrong because he's a human being, and human beings shouldn't say things like that.  It's pretty straightforward.  What did Momma always say?  "If you can't say anything nice, don't say anything at all!"  That would apply here.  What Trump said, was, for lack of a better word, mean.  He's a rich billionaire who has a distaste for poverty.  Let me be clear, Trump shouldn't have said what he said.  You will find no excuses for Trump's words, or Trump in general, here.

Second, can we please use the correct vernacular?  Trump's remarks were xenophobic, not racist.  There's a difference.  Google it.  He didn't say anything negative about the people of those nations.  What he was demeaning was their national socioeconomic status, which, generally speaking, is significantly worse than the good ol' US of A.  Once again, Trump is a rich billionaire.  He loves money.  He lives for money.  Money is, quite literally, his god, and he wants those people who come into our country to contribute to this land monetarily.  Another term for his attitude would be Nationalism, and back in my day (not my actual day, of course; the proverbial "back in my day") we used to call it being a proud American, dadgummit!  Somebody cue "America the Beautiful" for me and wave a flag behind me.  That's what Golden-Age America was all about.  We're better than everyone, right!?  Don't you guys remember his slogan?  He promised he would make America great again.  I believe that Trump sincerely loves America and loathes the idea of her glory being corrupted by the likes of inferior nations.  Naturally, he doesn't want us to become a @$#%hole nation like all those other countries!

Thirdly, once again, do you remember his campaign?  People elected him because of @%#$ like this.  He lacks tact, and that's why people voted for him.  People, at least half of the country, are sick of the politically-correct tightrope walking that politicians have been doing for years.  They're sick of the games that Washington has been playing, and they want somebody who speaks his mind in the Oval Office.  The more crass he is, the prouder they'll be to call him their president.

Fourthly, this is how badly people disliked Hillary.  Go back with me one more time to Trump's campaign.  How could a candidate, any candidate, lose to Donald Trump?!  The Democrats managed to nominate that one human being.  Hillary epitomized everything Trump supporters hated--disingenuousness, closed-door politics, social elitism, etc.  As morally repugnant as Trump was, Hillary was viewed as worse in the public eye, and not without cause.  She would have maintained the veneer of respect, even presidentiality, but it would have been nothing more than a charade.  The words that Trump said may never have escaped her lips, but you can darn well be sure that she would have agreed with them.  America is so fed up with hypocrisy that they appreciate candor, regardless of how offensive it is.

So, this is where we're at.  Donald Trump is our president.  Our other options are pretty limited.  I guess we should just sit back and enjoy the ride.




Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Real Presence & Paedocommunion: A Deeper Rift Between Reformed Churches

You're going back to Rome! Theological disagreements within the Reformed world, especially those of the last half century, often devolve into these sorts of accusations.  As controversialists like Doug Wilson and Peter Leithart began to break away from the larger conservative Presbyterian and Reformed denominations, it became clear that the rift was deeper than semantics and systematic minutiae.  Much like the Reformation four centuries before, the Table was a primary point of conflict.   What does it mean?  Who may partake?  What do we call it?    These questions, along with a few more, divided Reformed brethren as the physical elements of our religion reflected deeper conflicts.  Good men began to understand that the problem wasn't just in our logos, but in our pathos and ethos, as well. Paedocommunion (hereafter PC) has been one of the hottest points of contention.  PC has always been normal to me as I grew up with it.  I underst...

Anglicanism, Paedocommunion, & Being Reformed

I consider myself Reformed.  I was baptized as a baby in a PCA church.  I grew up in a Reformed microdenomination that allowed its member churches to subscribe to any of the Reformed confessions (we subscribed to the Three Forms of Unity).  In many ways, whether I like it or not, I still think and act like a Reformed Presbyterian.   Some, however, would seek to deny me that label.  I suspect there are many reasons for this, but paramount among them is that I hold to Paedocommunion (hereafter PC), which, for some reason, is absolutely the worst thing ever to these people.  Some would go so far as to say that PC makes me a heretic, but they all agree that I am certainly not Reformed .   My recent engagement with these opponents of PC has caused me to reflect on what it means to be Reformed and what it means to be a Christian.  This online jousting has dovetailed well with some of my recent study, particularly  An Apology of the Church...

Some Thoughts on the 2024 Election

So, we had an election earlier this week.  Perhaps you heard about it. I have done my best to remain mostly silent on political issues this time around because I have found that fixating on such matters does little for my mental or spiritual health.  Also, no one cares what I think.  Nevertheless, here are a few thoughts on our recent election. 1) I didn't vote for Donald Trump, but I'd be lying if I said I'm not glad he won.  To be clear, that says more about Kamala Harris than about Donald Trump. 2) This election seemed much cleaner--much less suspicious--than the sordid affair we had in 2020.  This election didn't feature any poll workers tallying (discovering? conjuring?) votes behind closed doors in the wee hours of the night, messy mail-in voting, or voter turnout beyond plausible expectations.  The 2020 election had me convinced that we would never see another peaceful, uncontested election, but, as contentious as things were this year, it seems like...