Skip to main content

A Few Thoughts on Trump's @$#%hole Comments

Trump's recent comments about immigrants coming from "@$#%hole countries" has created quite a buzz.

Perhaps you've heard about it.

One can understand why the President of the United States of America referring to other countries of the world in that way might not be appreciated, and, yet, we should be careful not to misconstrue his statements.  Here are a few quick thoughts on the matter:

Firstly, Trump was absolutely wrong to say what he said.  It was wrong because he's the PotUS, and that's not very presidential, but it's also wrong because he's a human being, and human beings shouldn't say things like that.  It's pretty straightforward.  What did Momma always say?  "If you can't say anything nice, don't say anything at all!"  That would apply here.  What Trump said, was, for lack of a better word, mean.  He's a rich billionaire who has a distaste for poverty.  Let me be clear, Trump shouldn't have said what he said.  You will find no excuses for Trump's words, or Trump in general, here.

Second, can we please use the correct vernacular?  Trump's remarks were xenophobic, not racist.  There's a difference.  Google it.  He didn't say anything negative about the people of those nations.  What he was demeaning was their national socioeconomic status, which, generally speaking, is significantly worse than the good ol' US of A.  Once again, Trump is a rich billionaire.  He loves money.  He lives for money.  Money is, quite literally, his god, and he wants those people who come into our country to contribute to this land monetarily.  Another term for his attitude would be Nationalism, and back in my day (not my actual day, of course; the proverbial "back in my day") we used to call it being a proud American, dadgummit!  Somebody cue "America the Beautiful" for me and wave a flag behind me.  That's what Golden-Age America was all about.  We're better than everyone, right!?  Don't you guys remember his slogan?  He promised he would make America great again.  I believe that Trump sincerely loves America and loathes the idea of her glory being corrupted by the likes of inferior nations.  Naturally, he doesn't want us to become a @$#%hole nation like all those other countries!

Thirdly, once again, do you remember his campaign?  People elected him because of @%#$ like this.  He lacks tact, and that's why people voted for him.  People, at least half of the country, are sick of the politically-correct tightrope walking that politicians have been doing for years.  They're sick of the games that Washington has been playing, and they want somebody who speaks his mind in the Oval Office.  The more crass he is, the prouder they'll be to call him their president.

Fourthly, this is how badly people disliked Hillary.  Go back with me one more time to Trump's campaign.  How could a candidate, any candidate, lose to Donald Trump?!  The Democrats managed to nominate that one human being.  Hillary epitomized everything Trump supporters hated--disingenuousness, closed-door politics, social elitism, etc.  As morally repugnant as Trump was, Hillary was viewed as worse in the public eye, and not without cause.  She would have maintained the veneer of respect, even presidentiality, but it would have been nothing more than a charade.  The words that Trump said may never have escaped her lips, but you can darn well be sure that she would have agreed with them.  America is so fed up with hypocrisy that they appreciate candor, regardless of how offensive it is.

So, this is where we're at.  Donald Trump is our president.  Our other options are pretty limited.  I guess we should just sit back and enjoy the ride.




Comments

Popular posts from this blog

4 Reasons I Affirm Paedocommunion

If you have interacted with me on social media, you know that I have always been outspoken on the issue of Paedocommunion .  It is a theological position and a liturgical practice about which I am passionate.  Having been raised, and having raised my children, at the Table, I cannot imagine attending a church that didn't allow PC.  I hope that when I am old and gray, I will still be an advocate for bringing little children to the Sacrament. Throughout the 12 years that I have had this blog, I have written scattered thoughts on the topic, but it appears that I have never written a concise summary of my reasons for affirming PC.  I was thoroughly convinced that I had, but I can't seem to locate it, so I guess I never did.  So, to rectify the omission, here are four reasons I hold to PC. 1) Paedocommunion is Biblical.   Any discussion of the topic should start here, and I would hope that both sides of the debate would make this assertion.  However, let me clarify what I mean when

1 Corinthians, the Covenant Hermeneutic, & Paedocommunion

As an adherent to Paedocommunion  (hereafter PC), I have always found it painfully ironic that Credocommunionists use 1 Corinthians 11 to withhold children (among others) from the Table.  One can imagine St. Paul shaking his head as he watches theologians using his discussion of unity at the Table to divide the body at the Table.  You're missing the point! he would say in exasperation.  Not only does 1 Corinthians 11 not forbid PC; I would go so far as to say that there is no better defense of PC in the New Testament than the epistle of 1 Corinthians. Credocommunionist logic is pretty straightforward.  1 Corinthians 11:28 says, "Let a person examine himself, then, and so eat of the bread and drink of the cup."  If, they argue, one is unable to fulfill the exhortation to examine himself, then he may not eat of the bread and drink of the cup.  This is a pretty logical deduction, right? Credobaptists would adamantly agree.  Acts 2:38 says, "Repent and be baptized...&quo

Why do you go to church on Sunday?

Why do you go to church on Sunday?  I would assume there are many reasons, but what is the primary reason that you get up on a cold, snowy Sunday morning and get your butt to church?  Further, why has the Church of Jesus Christ consistently gathered together on Sundays (among other days) for the last 2000 years? Throughout my 34 years of church attendance I would have proffered a variety of answers to that question.  As a child I'm sure I went to church because I had to, to see my cousins (who happened to be my best friends), to get bread and wine (weekly communion for the win), etc.  As my faith matured in adulthood these reasons remained, hopefully deepening, but to them were added concepts like rest and theological training. As I moved into Anglicanism I was struck by the deliberate focus on worship .  Why do Christians gather on Sunday morning?  To worship God!  Are teaching and fellowship important?  Absolutely!  Are they aspects of worship?  Certainly!  Is either the primary