Skip to main content

Vote! Or don't...

It's that time of year again!  It's time for us law-abiding citizens to get to the polls and vote!  Some would call this a privilege, while others would insist that it's a right.  True 'muricans, however, remind you that it is your duty.

Voting has rarely been as controversial in the good ol' United States of America as it is today, at least as far as the nature of that controversy goes.  Back in the day people fought over who was allowed to vote.  Was it only the landowners, the ruling class elite?  Should both men and women be allowed to cast their vote into the ballot box?  What about people whose skin is darker than your average Caucasian, and, if so, exactly how much melanin is too much before we assume you're not intellectual enough to vote?  Yeah, that was the kind of stuff we fought over for a long time.

Not our proudest moment.

Regardless, people wanted to vote and they fought for that right.  We're all about taxation with representation here in the U.S.A., and that means that the common man should be allowed to decide which rich guy taxes the heck out of him.

And they call me a cynic...

Today's voting controversy is a little bit different.  Now the "patriots" are trying to convince people that voting is a worthwhile way to spend an hour (hey, as long as there's WiFi in the building, I'm cool with standing in line).  Boomers are trying to convince the X'ers, Y'ers, Millennials, and [fill in the blank with your stereotypical generational moniker] that, despite 100 years of evidence to the contrary, voting actually accomplishes something.  The Boomers' kids, distracted by hedonistic pursuits, don't have the time or the will to vote.  Their kids, the dreaded Millennials, consider themselves woke as heck--politically inclined but disillusioned.  Having become disenchanted by the absurd futility of the American political process, they have disenfranchised themselves.  The funny thing is that, as this last election demonstrated, it was the Millennials not getting out and voting that really changed things, an ironic twist on the Boomers' belief in the power of voting.

So, what about Christians?  Should we vote?  Should we exercise this God-given right to pick between the elephant and the donkey?  Some would insist that you simply must.  How could you not capitalize on your right to vote when your forefathers gave their blood, sweat, and tears to procure it?  God himself ordained your birth into this noble Republic!  Vote, infidel!  Some would even go so far as to say that not voting is a sin.  Others, you see, approach it from a bit of a different angle.  Voting, to them, is fighting spiritual battles with carnal weapons.  We should concern ourselves with evangelism and do-gooding, and not with who occupies the oval office.  Voting is worldly, even sinful, they claim.  So who's right?

Both.

And neither.

If you want to vote, then do it.  There is nothing wrong with it.  If you want to use every legal means within your grasp to work for change in your community, state, country, etc., then go ahead.  Do it.

If you don't want to vote, then don't.  If you're of the opinion that your vote probably won't affect the direction the bourgeoisie is taking this country, then don't cast it.  That's okay, too.  If you think it's carnal, then don't do it.

If it is my right to vote, then it is also my right to abstain from voting.  Can't we all just get along?!  It's actually sort of weird when people try to convince people with whom they disagree to vote.  It's like your trying to stir up the opposing army.  It's counterproductive.

Personally, I usually get my voting on.  It's a relatively quick and painless process and, while I'm confident that my vote will never help decide who becomes the PoTUS, I do believe that it might have an effect at the local level (local officials, tax levies, state issues, etc.).

So, come next Tuesday, get out and vote!  Or don't...


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

5 Reasons I Want my Wife to Start Wearing a Head Covering during Corporate Worship

    Of late, the issue of head coverings has come up in my circle.  Okay...my cousin and I have been discussing it, but the point is, the issue has been bouncing around my head for the past few days.  It is a topic that I have avoided for some time.  Every time I read through 1 Corinthians, I would tell myself, "We'll get around to that."  The reality is that I didn't want to be "that guy"...that guy who people view as a chauvinistic jerk who wants to make sure everyone--especially his wife--remembers that he's the head of his home.  I think I'm beginning to respect "that guy"--those men who have cared enough to stand for what they believe.     Let me be clear that I am referring to head coverings for women (those old enough to leave them on...)  DURING CORPORATE WORSHIP.  I am not advocating head coverings at all times.  Though I see nothing necessarily wrong that practice, I don't see any command for it either.   ...

Halftime Shows, Kid Rock, & Celebrity Conversions

Conversions are often for the sake of expedience.  Android users adopt Apple products.  Energy drink drinkers start drinking coffee.  Fair-weather fans join the bandwagon for whatever team seems to be building a dynasty.  People are always changing their allegiances when it is convenient to do so. Religious conversions are no exception.  Such a conversion is often costly, as Christians in places like Nigeria and Pakistan can attest, but it is just as often done for power, money, or respectability.  Christianity, especially the quaint, neo-conservative kind that opposes Commies, supports Israel, and produces alternative entertainment content, is kind of in right now, so it's fair to question celebrity conversions at this particular moment in American history. Much has been made of the fact that Kid Rock headlined a conservative, religious alternative to Bad Bunny's halftime show.  If you don't know, Kid Rock hasn't exactly spent his career creating fa...

Paedocommunion: Consistent Covenantalism or Anti-Confessionalism?

    Being raised as a paedocommunionist (that means our kids get to eat Jesus, too), I have always been amazed by how passionately credocommunionists (that means their kids don't get to eat Jesus until they articulate a "credible" profession of faith) dislike the practice.  I would think that they could look at paedocommunion and at least respect it as an attempt to live out Covenant Theology in a consistent way.  Instead, paedocommunionists have been widely viewed as being on the fringe of the fringe (yes, that far) of Reformed Theology.  I like to think that I have been able to agree-to-disagree in an amicable way with my credocommunionist friends.  However, I will admit that being discounted as "unconfessional" (trust me, I've been called worse) has made many paedocommunionists (you'd have to ask my friends whether or not that applies to me) act in a manner that lacks Christian grace.     So, the question remains, is paedocommunion a view hel...