Skip to main content

Sexual Assault and the Entertainment Industry

Numerous allegations of sexual misconduct perpetrated by members of the music and movie industries continue to pour in as women (and men) have been emboldened to speak up against their aggressors.  From A-list actors to music moguls to film producers (politicians have certainly been in the cross-hairs, as well, but I'd like to focus on the entertainment industry) it seems no one is immune to the shock-wave caused by America's newfound empowerment of victims.  This social conscience, while long overdue, is admirable, if not hypocritical.  Now, of course, we should always remember that allegations are not evidence, but the responses given by many of these stars fall short of actually denying the allegations, which leads us little choice but to believe the victims.  Even those who have denied such wrongdoing are often less than convincing, given the number of allegations and the history of "rumors" within the entertainment community.  It seems Hollywood is bearing witness to the truth that "you reap what you sow."

My question is, "Is anyone surprised?"  I'm sad to say it, but I find it hard to be surprised that rich and powerful men have systematically taken advantage of vulnerable young men and women whom they have long viewed as being at their disposal.  It's sickening, but not surprising.  It's heinous, but wholly consistent with the enduring persona of Hollywood's untouchable millionaires and billionaires.  As a firm believer in what theologians call Total Depravity, I would expect nothing less from those who have no higher standards than the satisfaction of their own lusts.  Throw in a culture of drug abuse and alcoholism and you have a volatile recipe for abusive behavior.

Even less surprising is that these allegations are often aimed at those whose art is filled with sexual material.  This is not always the case, but it's hard to miss the obvious connection between the art that a person produces and what lurks in his heart.  Art is a reflection of life.  It is both a product of and an influence upon our hearts and minds, which means it will be reflected in the way we live our lives. If a director continuously fills his films with smut, it's probably a good indicator of his thought-life.  If a music producer floods the airwaves with sexual material, why should we be surprised to find that his music is a reflection of his life?  But, you insist, not everyone who creates sexually-explicit art is sexually licentious!  Further, not everyone who is sexually licentious is sexually abusive.  These statements are both true, and I want to be careful not to paint too broad a brush stroke here, but, nonetheless, it is naive to pretend that there is no connection.  Once again, there are many people who are restrained not by moral standards or personal inhibitions, but by societal norms and a lack of opportunity.  When these people find themselves behind closed doors with vulnerable people, those restraints are lost and depravity takes over.

This recent phenomenon belies the misconception that our thought lives can be wholly distinguished from our actions.  As Christians we should already know this.  God's Word calls us to be cautious about the forces we allow to influence our minds and hearts.  Proverbs 4:23 calls us to "Keep your heart with all vigilance, for from it flow the springs of life" and Colossians 3:2 instructs us to "Set your minds on things that are above, not on things on the earth."  1 Peter 5:8 says, "Be sober-minded; be watchful.  Your adversary the devil prowls around like a roaring lion, seeking someone to devour."  The concept that we can harmlessly imbibe sexual content in our entertainment is both naive and dangerous.  It will affect our lives.  Now, we know that "it is not what enters a man that defiles him," but our choice of entertainment reveals our hearts and spoil our consciences.  There is no neutral ground.  If we continuously choose to place sexually explicit material in front of our eyes and ears, we reveal that we lack the hatred of sin that God desires from His people.  If it is true that "bad company corrupts good morals," than we can be sure that bad entertainment will certainly corrode our morality, as well!

Paul makes the divine mandate clear in Philippians 4:8.  He says, "Finally, brothers, whatever is true, whatever is honorable, whatever is just, whatever is pure, whatever is lovely, whatever is commendable, if there is any excellence, if there is any thing worthy of praise, think about these things."  That should be our goal.  We should pursue not only the acceptable or the good, but the excellent.  We are to take captive every thought to the obedience of Christ, which is difficult to do if we are placing before our eyes that which is directly contrary to His will.  Our entertainment, our fashion, our relationships, etc. must all reflect this devotion to making Jesus Christ the Lord of our lives.  When our culture, which glorifies the individual and his lusts, entertains itself with immorality, we should not be surprised to find that immorality manifesting itself in the behavior of both the populace and (especially) those who are producing that entertainment.  If we allow our thoughts to be pornographic, we have little right to be alarmed when our behavior is, as well.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

4 Reasons I Affirm Paedocommunion

If you have interacted with me on social media, you know that I have always been outspoken on the issue of Paedocommunion .  It is a theological position and a liturgical practice about which I am passionate.  Having been raised, and having raised my children, at the Table, I cannot imagine attending a church that didn't allow PC.  I hope that when I am old and gray, I will still be an advocate for bringing little children to the Sacrament. Throughout the 12 years that I have had this blog, I have written scattered thoughts on the topic, but it appears that I have never written a concise summary of my reasons for affirming PC.  I was thoroughly convinced that I had, but I can't seem to locate it, so I guess I never did.  So, to rectify the omission, here are four reasons I hold to PC. 1) Paedocommunion is Biblical.   Any discussion of the topic should start here, and I would hope that both sides of the debate would make this assertion.  However, let me clarify what I mean when

1 Corinthians, the Covenant Hermeneutic, & Paedocommunion

As an adherent to Paedocommunion  (hereafter PC), I have always found it painfully ironic that Credocommunionists use 1 Corinthians 11 to withhold children (among others) from the Table.  One can imagine St. Paul shaking his head as he watches theologians using his discussion of unity at the Table to divide the body at the Table.  You're missing the point! he would say in exasperation.  Not only does 1 Corinthians 11 not forbid PC; I would go so far as to say that there is no better defense of PC in the New Testament than the epistle of 1 Corinthians. Credocommunionist logic is pretty straightforward.  1 Corinthians 11:28 says, "Let a person examine himself, then, and so eat of the bread and drink of the cup."  If, they argue, one is unable to fulfill the exhortation to examine himself, then he may not eat of the bread and drink of the cup.  This is a pretty logical deduction, right? Credobaptists would adamantly agree.  Acts 2:38 says, "Repent and be baptized...&quo

Why do you go to church on Sunday?

Why do you go to church on Sunday?  I would assume there are many reasons, but what is the primary reason that you get up on a cold, snowy Sunday morning and get your butt to church?  Further, why has the Church of Jesus Christ consistently gathered together on Sundays (among other days) for the last 2000 years? Throughout my 34 years of church attendance I would have proffered a variety of answers to that question.  As a child I'm sure I went to church because I had to, to see my cousins (who happened to be my best friends), to get bread and wine (weekly communion for the win), etc.  As my faith matured in adulthood these reasons remained, hopefully deepening, but to them were added concepts like rest and theological training. As I moved into Anglicanism I was struck by the deliberate focus on worship .  Why do Christians gather on Sunday morning?  To worship God!  Are teaching and fellowship important?  Absolutely!  Are they aspects of worship?  Certainly!  Is either the primary