Skip to main content

A Lesson in Materialism

So, we had some rain here in our fair state of Ohio last week.  As the recent purchaser of an old home, rain worries me--especially heavy rain.  Well, it turns out that my basement doesn't allow much water in through the foundation, but it also turns out that none of that matters if your sump pump, which is at least as old as the current homeowner, decides that running continuously for 10+ hours is the straw that breaks the camels back and that dying during a rainstorm is a good idea.  I received a call from my wife that our basement was filled with standing water.  Thankfully my place of employment replaces sump pumps and was able to get it fixed within a couple of hours, but the damage was done.  Did I mention that we just moved in back in September?  Did I mention that we've had sickness and a baby since then and so there were still several boxes of miscellaneous items scattered around the basement floor?  Yeah, that's not a good combo.  Water is simultaneously one of the most vital substances on earth and one of the most destructive.

 As I began to rummage through the affected stuff, I let out a few groans.  Some of it will be easily repurchased--books, CDs, etc., but many of the soaken items are basically irreplaceable--my diploma, the kids' decorative birth certificates, etc.  Thankfully some of them can be salvaged, but I caught myself mourning some of the lost/damaged items.  Even those things that can be salvaged will never be the same.  Now, I've never really thought of myself of being materialistic.  I was raised relatively poor.  My parents were simple folks raised by simple folks going back as far as I can tell.  I can honestly say that I don't consider myself to be a person guided primarily by money or nice things.  In fact, I can't remember making a life decision based upon how much money or stuff it would net me. If anything, I probably lack initiative and am too content being poor.

Now that I've gotten all the back-patting out of the way, let me proceed with the confession.  Man, did it suck seeing my stuff get wet.  It turns out that I'm a bit more of a materialist than I ever thought I was.  It just so happens that my stuff isn't really that great, but I love it nonetheless.  The vintage amp to my antique slide guitar?  I loved that.  My copy of  Tom Sawyer from 1904?  Yeah, I loved that book, too.  My N64?  I haven't played it in at least half a decade, but I loved the heck out of that! Something interesting can happen when you're raised modestly.  You develop emotional connections to insignificant items, even to the point where it can physically pain you to be rid of it.  Sometimes it leads to hoarding, but in less pronounced cases it just leads to a bunch of empty boxes in your basement that never, ever see the light of day.  The poor person treasuring their junk is no less an example of materialism than a rich person living extravagantly.

So, God taught me a lesson this past week.  Things are just things, and we shouldn't love them.  Even if you're not living your life to get rich, you can still have an inordinate love for physical possessions. You can define yourself by them and endow them with more value than they have.  Even family pictures and personal effects are temporal frivolities in the grand scheme of things.

Here's my new rule of thumb: if it can be damaged by water, it probably isn't that important anyway.      

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

4 Reasons I Affirm Paedocommunion

If you have interacted with me on social media, you know that I have always been outspoken on the issue of Paedocommunion .  It is a theological position and a liturgical practice about which I am passionate.  Having been raised, and having raised my children, at the Table, I cannot imagine attending a church that didn't allow PC.  I hope that when I am old and gray, I will still be an advocate for bringing little children to the Sacrament. Throughout the 12 years that I have had this blog, I have written scattered thoughts on the topic, but it appears that I have never written a concise summary of my reasons for affirming PC.  I was thoroughly convinced that I had, but I can't seem to locate it, so I guess I never did.  So, to rectify the omission, here are four reasons I hold to PC. 1) Paedocommunion is Biblical.   Any discussion of the topic should start here, and I would hope that both sides of the debate would make this assertion.  However, l...

1 Corinthians, the Covenant Hermeneutic, & Paedocommunion

As an adherent to Paedocommunion  (hereafter PC), I have always found it painfully ironic that Credocommunionists use 1 Corinthians 11 to withhold children (among others) from the Table.  One can imagine St. Paul shaking his head as he watches theologians using his discussion of unity at the Table to divide the body at the Table.  You're missing the point! he would say in exasperation.  Not only does 1 Corinthians 11 not forbid PC; I would go so far as to say that there is no better defense of PC in the New Testament than the epistle of 1 Corinthians. Credocommunionist logic is pretty straightforward.  1 Corinthians 11:28 says, "Let a person examine himself, then, and so eat of the bread and drink of the cup."  If, they argue, one is unable to fulfill the exhortation to examine himself, then he may not eat of the bread and drink of the cup.  This is a pretty logical deduction, right? Credobaptists would adamantly agree.  Acts 2:38 says, "Repe...

The Real Presence & Paedocommunion: A Deeper Rift Between Reformed Churches

You're going back to Rome! Theological disagreements within the Reformed world, especially those of the last half century, often devolve into these sorts of accusations.  As controversialists like Doug Wilson and Peter Leithart began to break away from the larger conservative Presbyterian and Reformed denominations, it became clear that the rift was deeper than semantics and systematic minutiae.  Much like the Reformation four centuries before, the Table was a primary point of conflict.   What does it mean?  Who may partake?  What do we call it?    These questions, along with a few more, divided Reformed brethren as the physical elements of our religion reflected deeper conflicts.  Good men began to understand that the problem wasn't just in our logos, but in our pathos and ethos, as well. Paedocommunion (hereafter PC) has been one of the hottest points of contention.  PC has always been normal to me as I grew up with it.  I underst...