Skip to main content

10 Reasons You Should Read Eusebius' Ecclesiastical History

After seeing Eusebius' Ecclesiastical History (get that edition! and read the footnotes!) referenced in, oh, just about every single book that deals with the history of the Early Church, I decided that I had to go back to the source and read it myself.  So I jumped on Amazon and bought it.  After it sat on my nightstand for about six months, I finally got around to reading it.  Here's 10 reasons why you should read it, too.

#1: History has a way of humbling you.  It forces you to see that your perspective on any given topic is not only one of many, but is perhaps not even one that was considered at all in times past.  This was a particularly important lesson for me as a Presbyterian because too many of us a) think we know Church history (we actually only know post-Reformation Reformed history) and b) we think the Reformed perspective is the only valid one.

#2: Eusebius preserves the writings of many early church fathers.  There is something uniquely edifying in reading the words of those who lived within a few centuries of Christ.  Some of the writings found in this book are dated back to within the lifetimes of those who knew the Apostles. Even though we don't consider these writers/writings to be infallible or canonical by any means, they are incredibly beneficial to read.

#3: Eusebius preserves the accounts of many martyrs for the faith.  By far the most emotionally engaging section is the Book of Martyrs (originally a separate work), which offers in some detail the suffering (sometimes graphic) of those who refused to offer incense to the emperor.  This section is both encouraging and challenging.

#4: This book helps to foster an ecumenical spirit by reminding the reader of a time when the Church was truly Catholic (universal).  There were heresies and schisms, but unity was preserved through all of it, and it was often done in a loving, gentle way.  It serves as a good reminder that we are all part of the one body of Christ.

#5: On that note, it is also a good reminder that the Universal Church is not simply an international, cross-ethnic reality, but also an eternal reality.  We are as truly united in Christ to the Christians of the first century as we are to the Christians alive right now in Asia, Africa, etc.  It is good to remember your place in Church history and your unity to all who have, are, or will be in Christ.

#5:  The early church fathers weren't idiots.  You can actually learn a ton by reading what they wrote.

#6: Though tedious, it's interesting and will expand your mind.

#7: Reading history, especially Church history, reminds the reader that everyone everywhere at every time had problems, and many of those problems were way worse than the ones we experience in our own day.

#8: Reading Church history, especially from such an early period, helps us to understand the role that the Church has played in the history of the world, particularly Western thought and culture.

#9: Eusebius emphasizes Church government, and while he does not intentionally outline the evolution of Christian ecclesiastical government, his work is full of useful information for the student of church polity.  This is something modern evangelicals will benefit from as it will challenge some of our preconceived notions about how the church was run in the seminal days of our history.

#10: It's a stinkin' classic!  What more do you need to know?  Eusebius truly is the father of ecclesiastical history and he preserves so much that would have been otherwise lost.  Sure, his sentences run as long as paragraphs sometimes.  Sure, the book is longer than your comic book or UsWeekly, but, as with most classics, it is a classic for a reason, and it's well worth the time invested to read it.

And for a bonus:

#11: You'll learn big words (well, if you care enough to take the time to look them up; if not, you'll simply not understand half of the book).

So follow the link and order your copy today!  You'll be glad you did!



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

4 Reasons I Affirm Paedocommunion

If you have interacted with me on social media, you know that I have always been outspoken on the issue of Paedocommunion .  It is a theological position and a liturgical practice about which I am passionate.  Having been raised, and having raised my children, at the Table, I cannot imagine attending a church that didn't allow PC.  I hope that when I am old and gray, I will still be an advocate for bringing little children to the Sacrament. Throughout the 12 years that I have had this blog, I have written scattered thoughts on the topic, but it appears that I have never written a concise summary of my reasons for affirming PC.  I was thoroughly convinced that I had, but I can't seem to locate it, so I guess I never did.  So, to rectify the omission, here are four reasons I hold to PC. 1) Paedocommunion is Biblical.   Any discussion of the topic should start here, and I would hope that both sides of the debate would make this assertion.  However, l...

1 Corinthians, the Covenant Hermeneutic, & Paedocommunion

As an adherent to Paedocommunion  (hereafter PC), I have always found it painfully ironic that Credocommunionists use 1 Corinthians 11 to withhold children (among others) from the Table.  One can imagine St. Paul shaking his head as he watches theologians using his discussion of unity at the Table to divide the body at the Table.  You're missing the point! he would say in exasperation.  Not only does 1 Corinthians 11 not forbid PC; I would go so far as to say that there is no better defense of PC in the New Testament than the epistle of 1 Corinthians. Credocommunionist logic is pretty straightforward.  1 Corinthians 11:28 says, "Let a person examine himself, then, and so eat of the bread and drink of the cup."  If, they argue, one is unable to fulfill the exhortation to examine himself, then he may not eat of the bread and drink of the cup.  This is a pretty logical deduction, right? Credobaptists would adamantly agree.  Acts 2:38 says, "Repe...

The Real Presence & Paedocommunion: A Deeper Rift Between Reformed Churches

You're going back to Rome! Theological disagreements within the Reformed world, especially those of the last half century, often devolve into these sorts of accusations.  As controversialists like Doug Wilson and Peter Leithart began to break away from the larger conservative Presbyterian and Reformed denominations, it became clear that the rift was deeper than semantics and systematic minutiae.  Much like the Reformation four centuries before, the Table was a primary point of conflict.   What does it mean?  Who may partake?  What do we call it?    These questions, along with a few more, divided Reformed brethren as the physical elements of our religion reflected deeper conflicts.  Good men began to understand that the problem wasn't just in our logos, but in our pathos and ethos, as well. Paedocommunion (hereafter PC) has been one of the hottest points of contention.  PC has always been normal to me as I grew up with it.  I underst...