Skip to main content

Are We Still Really Arguing about the Election?

So I turned on the news the other day.  That was my first mistake.  I like to keep myself informed, I guess, but turning on the mainstream news hardly helps one to gather concrete information.  It does, however, allow you to see the type of idiocy that goes on in our nation's capital, so I turned on the TV around 6:00 P.M to see what was happening.  All the evening news programs were on and they were all, without fail, discussing the allegations that the Russians were involved in hacking and proliferating negative information in order to manipulate the election.  For some reason, they were all stating this as if it were a negative thing.  Imagine that!  The press is criticizing someone for spreading information!  Could the media "out" themselves any more clearly?  What more could they do to reveal their patent bias?

Get this.  The Democratic party, along with their bedfellows in the media, are accusing Russia, one of the most powerful nations in the world, of manipulating our Presidential election by revealing hidden information about one of the candidates!  Well, two things.  First off, if Russia did, in fact, manipulate our election, then they clearly learned from the best, namely, the United States of America.  What have we done for the last five decades if not manipulate the affairs of just about every foreign country (at least the ones with oil)?  We send soldiers.  We send weapons.  We topple dictators and intimidate regimes.  America, of all countries, has no room to be accusing Russia of interfering with our election!

Secondly, let these accusations really soak in for just a second.  They are accusing Russia of telling Americans how corrupt our government is!  How dare they?!  Have you ever heard anyone deny any of the details that have come to light through the WikiLeaks dumps?  Even in the debates Hillary chose not to do so. Have you seen anyone claim that the information being released was fraudulent? Nope.  It's all real.  It's all verifiable information.  The media, if they had any ethical fortitude whatsoever, should have been on the cutting edge of this whole thing.  They should have been pushing for transparency and accountability.  They should have been calling Hillary to answer for the litany of damning revelations that were made over the course of the final months of the campaign. They have done nothing of the sort.

So why are we still talking about this?  You can be sure that everything in D.C. is calculated, as is everything the mainstream media allows into our homes.  What benefit could they possibly receive from spreading anti-Russian sentiment?  It's a distraction, my friends.  That's all I can figure.  How much have you heard about WikiLeaks lately, outside of the blame being laid on Russia?  How much have you seen going around about the Clinton Foundation and the trail of bodies in Hillary's wake? Not much, right?  Once the election was over, all that went away.  Trump hasn't talked about it.  The media isn't talking about it.  Even the internet has gone cold on us!  Instead, everyone's trying to figure out who was behind it all.

What does this mean for our society?  Well, firstly, it means we have a short memory.  We wail on Facebook when someone dies or some catastrophe happens, but we forget about it a week later.  We were all up in arms about Hillary this and Hillary that, but now that season is over and we don't care. Secondly, and more significantly, this means that truth-tellers can't survive in our culture, which is a sign of a corrupt, tyrannical government and system.  They control the information.  If information gets out that they don't want you to possess, instead of punishing those implicated by this information, they punish those responsible for getting the information out there.  Ever heard of Edward Snowden?  Yeah, that's what our country does to the people who have the courage to be whistle-blowers.

So, whether Russia had anything to do with the WikiLeaks thing or not, it shouldn't really matter. Sure we should make sure our nation is secure from international hackers, but, no, that should not deflect our attention from the corruption being uncovered.  Wrong doing, once uncovered, should be paid for, regardless of how that information came to light.  

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Real Presence & Paedocommunion: A Deeper Rift Between Reformed Churches

You're going back to Rome! Theological disagreements within the Reformed world, especially those of the last half century, often devolve into these sorts of accusations.  As controversialists like Doug Wilson and Peter Leithart began to break away from the larger conservative Presbyterian and Reformed denominations, it became clear that the rift was deeper than semantics and systematic minutiae.  Much like the Reformation four centuries before, the Table was a primary point of conflict.   What does it mean?  Who may partake?  What do we call it?    These questions, along with a few more, divided Reformed brethren as the physical elements of our religion reflected deeper conflicts.  Good men began to understand that the problem wasn't just in our logos, but in our pathos and ethos, as well. Paedocommunion (hereafter PC) has been one of the hottest points of contention.  PC has always been normal to me as I grew up with it.  I underst...

Anglicanism, Paedocommunion, & Being Reformed

I consider myself Reformed.  I was baptized as a baby in a PCA church.  I grew up in a Reformed microdenomination that allowed its member churches to subscribe to any of the Reformed confessions (we subscribed to the Three Forms of Unity).  In many ways, whether I like it or not, I still think and act like a Reformed Presbyterian.   Some, however, would seek to deny me that label.  I suspect there are many reasons for this, but paramount among them is that I hold to Paedocommunion (hereafter PC), which, for some reason, is absolutely the worst thing ever to these people.  Some would go so far as to say that PC makes me a heretic, but they all agree that I am certainly not Reformed .   My recent engagement with these opponents of PC has caused me to reflect on what it means to be Reformed and what it means to be a Christian.  This online jousting has dovetailed well with some of my recent study, particularly  An Apology of the Church...

Some Thoughts on the 2024 Election

So, we had an election earlier this week.  Perhaps you heard about it. I have done my best to remain mostly silent on political issues this time around because I have found that fixating on such matters does little for my mental or spiritual health.  Also, no one cares what I think.  Nevertheless, here are a few thoughts on our recent election. 1) I didn't vote for Donald Trump, but I'd be lying if I said I'm not glad he won.  To be clear, that says more about Kamala Harris than about Donald Trump. 2) This election seemed much cleaner--much less suspicious--than the sordid affair we had in 2020.  This election didn't feature any poll workers tallying (discovering? conjuring?) votes behind closed doors in the wee hours of the night, messy mail-in voting, or voter turnout beyond plausible expectations.  The 2020 election had me convinced that we would never see another peaceful, uncontested election, but, as contentious as things were this year, it seems like...