Skip to main content

The Problem with the Sales Tax Holiday

   Many families spent last weekend doing their back-to-school shopping, not only because it was a nice weekend and school is coming up quickly, but also because it was the sales tax holiday.  This so-called holiday offered a reprieve from the state sales tax associated with purchasing most of the items we buy on a regular basis.  Many incorrectly thought that they could go buy things like TVs and other fun things, but the holiday was strictly limited to items associated with going back to school--clothes, school supplies, etc.  People jumped at the opportunity to buy things at a little bit of a discount, but few really thought through the implications of such an event.  Here are three:


  1. Taxation has been ingrained into our consciousness.  When we go to purchase items, we subconsciously add tax in our minds.  That means the government has us where they want us. Taxation of goods and services is something we now take for granted.  When I go to buy food, I'm surprised when the bill is lower than I thought because of the lack of sales tax.  Now, I know that food is not taxed (in Ohio anyway, unless you're going to eat it in a restaurant), but I always add tax in my mind because I'm used to adjusting mentally.  They have me right where they want me, which leads to #2.
  2. The government likes to act like they're giving us a treat.  It's a classic tactic--overly regulate and then act like you're being nice by giving back some of the freedom.  People begin to appreciate every scrap of freedom they receive from Uncle Sam's stingy fingers, never stopping for a moment to consider why he is the arbiter of those freedoms in the first place.  That leads us to #3.  
  3. The government is God. Our rights and our lives come from them.  That's how our country works now, anyhow.  Men worship.  It is inescapable.  Freedom can only be maintained in a culture that worships God and sees government as His servant.  When the Master is taken away, the servant will take His place.  The government is now the originator and the arbiter of our freedoms.  We pay property tax because we live on the government's land.  We pay sales tax because we trade in the government's marketplace. On and on it goes.

    The obvious question we have to ask is this: "Why should the government get money every time I buy or sell an item?"  Now, I'm not a "taxation is theft" sort of guy.  Taxation is an inevitable and Biblical part of a well-ordered society.  What I don't like is when taxation becomes associated with every aspect of our lives.  Your mom dies and leaves you a house.  Taxes.  You sell your car to your next-door neighbor.  Taxes.  You buy yourself a brand new car to replace the car that you just sold. Guess what?!  Taxes.  You go to Goodwill, for St. Peter's sake, and you pay tax on used items for which people already paid sales tax!  That, my friends, is absurd!

    No government--federal, state, or local--grants you your freedoms.  Our founding fathers, despite their faults, were absolutely correct in acknowledging that our Creator has bestowed our rights upon us.  We are all equal because we are creatures of God, made in His image.  That is the only valid argument for equality.  If we're living in an evolutionary cage match, the biggest dog has the right to do whatever he wants.  We aren't, however.  God has made us in His image, bestowed inalienable rights upon us, and established government for the express purpose of administering His justice on Earth.  Our government does not give us our rights.  They're supposed to protect them.

    So next time you go up to the counter and buy a pair of socks, consider why you're paying sales tax.  Is there anything you can do about it?  No, not really, but at least you'll be aware of the injustice. Trust me, it doesn't really help.  

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Real Presence & Paedocommunion: A Deeper Rift Between Reformed Churches

You're going back to Rome! Theological disagreements within the Reformed world, especially those of the last half century, often devolve into these sorts of accusations.  As controversialists like Doug Wilson and Peter Leithart began to break away from the larger conservative Presbyterian and Reformed denominations, it became clear that the rift was deeper than semantics and systematic minutiae.  Much like the Reformation four centuries before, the Table was a primary point of conflict.   What does it mean?  Who may partake?  What do we call it?    These questions, along with a few more, divided Reformed brethren as the physical elements of our religion reflected deeper conflicts.  Good men began to understand that the problem wasn't just in our logos, but in our pathos and ethos, as well. Paedocommunion (hereafter PC) has been one of the hottest points of contention.  PC has always been normal to me as I grew up with it.  I underst...

Anglicanism, Paedocommunion, & Being Reformed

I consider myself Reformed.  I was baptized as a baby in a PCA church.  I grew up in a Reformed microdenomination that allowed its member churches to subscribe to any of the Reformed confessions (we subscribed to the Three Forms of Unity).  In many ways, whether I like it or not, I still think and act like a Reformed Presbyterian.   Some, however, would seek to deny me that label.  I suspect there are many reasons for this, but paramount among them is that I hold to Paedocommunion (hereafter PC), which, for some reason, is absolutely the worst thing ever to these people.  Some would go so far as to say that PC makes me a heretic, but they all agree that I am certainly not Reformed .   My recent engagement with these opponents of PC has caused me to reflect on what it means to be Reformed and what it means to be a Christian.  This online jousting has dovetailed well with some of my recent study, particularly  An Apology of the Church...

Some Thoughts on the 2024 Election

So, we had an election earlier this week.  Perhaps you heard about it. I have done my best to remain mostly silent on political issues this time around because I have found that fixating on such matters does little for my mental or spiritual health.  Also, no one cares what I think.  Nevertheless, here are a few thoughts on our recent election. 1) I didn't vote for Donald Trump, but I'd be lying if I said I'm not glad he won.  To be clear, that says more about Kamala Harris than about Donald Trump. 2) This election seemed much cleaner--much less suspicious--than the sordid affair we had in 2020.  This election didn't feature any poll workers tallying (discovering? conjuring?) votes behind closed doors in the wee hours of the night, messy mail-in voting, or voter turnout beyond plausible expectations.  The 2020 election had me convinced that we would never see another peaceful, uncontested election, but, as contentious as things were this year, it seems like...