Skip to main content

When You Vote for Trump, This Is What You're Doing...

   If you want to vote for Donald Trump, feel free.  I am not here to dictate to your conscience what you should do.  I ain't God and I ain't yer momma, but at least be aware of exactly what you're doing. Let me offer you ten stark statements about what you're doing when you place your vote behind such a man.  When you vote for Donald Trump, you are voting for a man who:

1) Insinuated that Ted Cruz's father was connected with JFK's assassin.

2) Mocked the appearance of Ted Cruz's wife.

3) Made fun of a reporter with a physical disability.

4) Made disturbing comments on his daughter's physical appearance.

5) Appeared on the cover of Playboy.

6) Cheated on his wives.

7) Made phallic references during a debate.

8) Went bankrupt.

9) Donated money to Hillary and Co.

10) Has changed his views on almost everything.

    Once again, vote as you think you should.  Many people choose a candidate primarily based on the opposition.  That's one strategy for voting, and it makes sense some of the time.  However, if you vote for a man whose only redeeming quality is that he isn't the other candidate, you may want to rethink your strategy.  When that strategy will let you vote for a man despite these abhorrent actions and obvious character flaws (and numerous others--the list could go on and on), it might be time to stay home or vote for a third-party candidate.  

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Real Presence & Paedocommunion: A Deeper Rift Between Reformed Churches

You're going back to Rome! Theological disagreements within the Reformed world, especially those of the last half century, often devolve into these sorts of accusations.  As controversialists like Doug Wilson and Peter Leithart began to break away from the larger conservative Presbyterian and Reformed denominations, it became clear that the rift was deeper than semantics and systematic minutiae.  Much like the Reformation four centuries before, the Table was a primary point of conflict.   What does it mean?  Who may partake?  What do we call it?    These questions, along with a few more, divided Reformed brethren as the physical elements of our religion reflected deeper conflicts.  Good men began to understand that the problem wasn't just in our logos, but in our pathos and ethos, as well. Paedocommunion (hereafter PC) has been one of the hottest points of contention.  PC has always been normal to me as I grew up with it.  I underst...

Anglicanism, Paedocommunion, & Being Reformed

I consider myself Reformed.  I was baptized as a baby in a PCA church.  I grew up in a Reformed microdenomination that allowed its member churches to subscribe to any of the Reformed confessions (we subscribed to the Three Forms of Unity).  In many ways, whether I like it or not, I still think and act like a Reformed Presbyterian.   Some, however, would seek to deny me that label.  I suspect there are many reasons for this, but paramount among them is that I hold to Paedocommunion (hereafter PC), which, for some reason, is absolutely the worst thing ever to these people.  Some would go so far as to say that PC makes me a heretic, but they all agree that I am certainly not Reformed .   My recent engagement with these opponents of PC has caused me to reflect on what it means to be Reformed and what it means to be a Christian.  This online jousting has dovetailed well with some of my recent study, particularly  An Apology of the Church...

Some Thoughts on the 2024 Election

So, we had an election earlier this week.  Perhaps you heard about it. I have done my best to remain mostly silent on political issues this time around because I have found that fixating on such matters does little for my mental or spiritual health.  Also, no one cares what I think.  Nevertheless, here are a few thoughts on our recent election. 1) I didn't vote for Donald Trump, but I'd be lying if I said I'm not glad he won.  To be clear, that says more about Kamala Harris than about Donald Trump. 2) This election seemed much cleaner--much less suspicious--than the sordid affair we had in 2020.  This election didn't feature any poll workers tallying (discovering? conjuring?) votes behind closed doors in the wee hours of the night, messy mail-in voting, or voter turnout beyond plausible expectations.  The 2020 election had me convinced that we would never see another peaceful, uncontested election, but, as contentious as things were this year, it seems like...