Skip to main content

Understanding Christian Liberty

    Much has been made lately of Christian liberty.  It seems to be the answer to any sort of ethical ambiguity or rebuke.  How could you watch that?  Christian liberty!  How could you vote for him/her?  Christian liberty, of course!  How could you  do [fill in the blank]?  Haven't you ever heard of Christian liberty?!  Violating your brother's Christian liberty appears to be the only thing that can't be covered under the Christian liberty clause of Christianity.  This abuse of Christian liberty appears to demonstrate a fundamental misunderstanding of what Christian liberty really is.

    What do most people mean these days by Christian liberty?  It is commonly believed that Christian liberty is the Christian's freedom from "law."  By that some mean the Old Testament Law, while others intend law in general--"rules," if you will.  In practice, however, Christian liberty often ends up meaning "I'm saved; quit telling me what to do!"  This is not always the case, but it is becoming increasingly common.  Forgiveness of sins becomes the rationale for licentiousness.

    There is a proper place for and meaning of Christian liberty.  The Westminster Confession of Faith (20:1) defines it (partly) this way:

"The liberty which Christ has purchased for believers under the Gospel consists in their freedom from the guilt of sin, and condemning wrath of God, the curse of the moral law; and, in their being delivered from this present evil world, bondage to Satan, and dominion of sin..."
This excerpt from the Confession's definition identifies two similar, though distinct, elements of Christian liberty.  Firstly, the death of Christ on our behalf frees us from guilt.  Paul tells us in Romans 8:1 that those who are united to Jesus Christ by faith no longer stand under condemnation. Justification is a done deal.  If God has worked in our hearts and we have truly come to saving faith, we are justified.  "Who can bring a charge against God's elect?" Paul asks rhetorically a few verses later.  We can have assurance of our salvation.  We do not have to proceed through life wondering if we will be saved.

    Secondly, Christian liberty means that we have been freed from the power of sin.  Paul tells us in Romans 6:1-10 that those who died with Christ on the cross have also been raised with Him in His Resurrection.  We are no longer slaves to sin.  Christ, our kinsman-redeemer, has freed us from the chains of sin, darkness, and the devil.

    This second meaning of Christian liberty is much abused.  The exact opposite view is often held. Too many Christians view it as a freedom to sin, when the Bible clearly teaches that the freedom Christ brings is freedom from sin!  Simply put, if you think that Christian liberty is the freedom to sin, you don't understand that from which you were saved.  Certainly our Christian liberty provides us with the comfort that Christ has saved us from our sin.  It also frees us from the complex ceremonial system of the Old Covenant.  By no means, however, does it free our conscience to sin unabated. Being freed from slavery to sin, would we willingly put those chains back on?  Being cleansed from the filth of sin, would we wallow in it again, as pigs return to the mud?  Would we be dogs who return to their vomit?

    You see, the problem with sin is not just that it condemns us.  The problem with sin is that it is opposed to God.  It is an affront to Him.  He hates it and it offends Him.  Anyone who desires to continue in that type of activity should question whether or not his heart has been changed.  If you can continually grieve the Holy Spirit without any conviction, you should seriously consider whether or not you have received the Holy Spirit.  How can a child of God, redeemed by Christ and regenerated by the Holy Spirit, desire to live in a way that offends His Heavenly Father?  Scripture calls us to live in a way that is consistent with our new identity (Colossians 3:1).  The idea that forgiveness of sin would lead to freedom to sin is the farthest thing from the New Testament concept of Christian liberty (Romans 6:1-2).  No, who who have been set free from sin are slaves of righteousness (Romans 6:18).  If you use forgiveness to rationalize your sin, perhaps it is time for deep introspection and prayer.

     

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

"Father, Forgive Them"

“Father, forgive them, for they know not what they do.” Forgiveness is hard.  Forgiveness is really, really hard. It’s difficult to forgive others who have genuinely harmed or offended us.   It’s easy to say , “I forgive you,” but it’s extremely difficult to feel it–to make peace in our hearts with the injustices that others have perpetrated against us. It just doesn’t feel right.  Sin should be punished!  Wrongs should be righted!  Right?! It’s difficult to forgive others when they ask for it.  It’s even more difficult to forgive them when they haven’t asked for it–when they don’t even recognize what they’ve done to hurt us. As our Savior hung upon His Cross, He asked the Father to forgive those nearby–those who were unwittingly contributing to the greatest injustice in the history of the world. These thieves, soldiers, and standers-by had no idea what was happening.  They had no idea that the jealousy of the Jews had placed Christ on that Cross...

5 Reasons I Want my Wife to Start Wearing a Head Covering during Corporate Worship

    Of late, the issue of head coverings has come up in my circle.  Okay...my cousin and I have been discussing it, but the point is, the issue has been bouncing around my head for the past few days.  It is a topic that I have avoided for some time.  Every time I read through 1 Corinthians, I would tell myself, "We'll get around to that."  The reality is that I didn't want to be "that guy"...that guy who people view as a chauvinistic jerk who wants to make sure everyone--especially his wife--remembers that he's the head of his home.  I think I'm beginning to respect "that guy"--those men who have cared enough to stand for what they believe.     Let me be clear that I am referring to head coverings for women (those old enough to leave them on...)  DURING CORPORATE WORSHIP.  I am not advocating head coverings at all times.  Though I see nothing necessarily wrong that practice, I don't see any command for it either.   ...

The Real Presence & Paedocommunion: A Deeper Rift Between Reformed Churches

You're going back to Rome! Theological disagreements within the Reformed world, especially those of the last half century, often devolve into these sorts of accusations.  As controversialists like Doug Wilson and Peter Leithart began to break away from the larger conservative Presbyterian and Reformed denominations, it became clear that the rift was deeper than semantics and systematic minutiae.  Much like the Reformation four centuries before, the Table was a primary point of conflict.   What does it mean?  Who may partake?  What do we call it?    These questions, along with a few more, divided Reformed brethren as the physical elements of our religion reflected deeper conflicts.  Good men began to understand that the problem wasn't just in our logos, but in our pathos and ethos, as well. Paedocommunion (hereafter PC) has been one of the hottest points of contention.  PC has always been normal to me as I grew up with it.  I underst...