Skip to main content

Understanding Christian Liberty

    Much has been made lately of Christian liberty.  It seems to be the answer to any sort of ethical ambiguity or rebuke.  How could you watch that?  Christian liberty!  How could you vote for him/her?  Christian liberty, of course!  How could you  do [fill in the blank]?  Haven't you ever heard of Christian liberty?!  Violating your brother's Christian liberty appears to be the only thing that can't be covered under the Christian liberty clause of Christianity.  This abuse of Christian liberty appears to demonstrate a fundamental misunderstanding of what Christian liberty really is.

    What do most people mean these days by Christian liberty?  It is commonly believed that Christian liberty is the Christian's freedom from "law."  By that some mean the Old Testament Law, while others intend law in general--"rules," if you will.  In practice, however, Christian liberty often ends up meaning "I'm saved; quit telling me what to do!"  This is not always the case, but it is becoming increasingly common.  Forgiveness of sins becomes the rationale for licentiousness.

    There is a proper place for and meaning of Christian liberty.  The Westminster Confession of Faith (20:1) defines it (partly) this way:

"The liberty which Christ has purchased for believers under the Gospel consists in their freedom from the guilt of sin, and condemning wrath of God, the curse of the moral law; and, in their being delivered from this present evil world, bondage to Satan, and dominion of sin..."
This excerpt from the Confession's definition identifies two similar, though distinct, elements of Christian liberty.  Firstly, the death of Christ on our behalf frees us from guilt.  Paul tells us in Romans 8:1 that those who are united to Jesus Christ by faith no longer stand under condemnation. Justification is a done deal.  If God has worked in our hearts and we have truly come to saving faith, we are justified.  "Who can bring a charge against God's elect?" Paul asks rhetorically a few verses later.  We can have assurance of our salvation.  We do not have to proceed through life wondering if we will be saved.

    Secondly, Christian liberty means that we have been freed from the power of sin.  Paul tells us in Romans 6:1-10 that those who died with Christ on the cross have also been raised with Him in His Resurrection.  We are no longer slaves to sin.  Christ, our kinsman-redeemer, has freed us from the chains of sin, darkness, and the devil.

    This second meaning of Christian liberty is much abused.  The exact opposite view is often held. Too many Christians view it as a freedom to sin, when the Bible clearly teaches that the freedom Christ brings is freedom from sin!  Simply put, if you think that Christian liberty is the freedom to sin, you don't understand that from which you were saved.  Certainly our Christian liberty provides us with the comfort that Christ has saved us from our sin.  It also frees us from the complex ceremonial system of the Old Covenant.  By no means, however, does it free our conscience to sin unabated. Being freed from slavery to sin, would we willingly put those chains back on?  Being cleansed from the filth of sin, would we wallow in it again, as pigs return to the mud?  Would we be dogs who return to their vomit?

    You see, the problem with sin is not just that it condemns us.  The problem with sin is that it is opposed to God.  It is an affront to Him.  He hates it and it offends Him.  Anyone who desires to continue in that type of activity should question whether or not his heart has been changed.  If you can continually grieve the Holy Spirit without any conviction, you should seriously consider whether or not you have received the Holy Spirit.  How can a child of God, redeemed by Christ and regenerated by the Holy Spirit, desire to live in a way that offends His Heavenly Father?  Scripture calls us to live in a way that is consistent with our new identity (Colossians 3:1).  The idea that forgiveness of sin would lead to freedom to sin is the farthest thing from the New Testament concept of Christian liberty (Romans 6:1-2).  No, who who have been set free from sin are slaves of righteousness (Romans 6:18).  If you use forgiveness to rationalize your sin, perhaps it is time for deep introspection and prayer.

     

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

4 Reasons I Affirm Paedocommunion

If you have interacted with me on social media, you know that I have always been outspoken on the issue of Paedocommunion .  It is a theological position and a liturgical practice about which I am passionate.  Having been raised, and having raised my children, at the Table, I cannot imagine attending a church that didn't allow PC.  I hope that when I am old and gray, I will still be an advocate for bringing little children to the Sacrament. Throughout the 12 years that I have had this blog, I have written scattered thoughts on the topic, but it appears that I have never written a concise summary of my reasons for affirming PC.  I was thoroughly convinced that I had, but I can't seem to locate it, so I guess I never did.  So, to rectify the omission, here are four reasons I hold to PC. 1) Paedocommunion is Biblical.   Any discussion of the topic should start here, and I would hope that both sides of the debate would make this assertion.  However, let me clarify what I mean when

1 Corinthians, the Covenant Hermeneutic, & Paedocommunion

As an adherent to Paedocommunion  (hereafter PC), I have always found it painfully ironic that Credocommunionists use 1 Corinthians 11 to withhold children (among others) from the Table.  One can imagine St. Paul shaking his head as he watches theologians using his discussion of unity at the Table to divide the body at the Table.  You're missing the point! he would say in exasperation.  Not only does 1 Corinthians 11 not forbid PC; I would go so far as to say that there is no better defense of PC in the New Testament than the epistle of 1 Corinthians. Credocommunionist logic is pretty straightforward.  1 Corinthians 11:28 says, "Let a person examine himself, then, and so eat of the bread and drink of the cup."  If, they argue, one is unable to fulfill the exhortation to examine himself, then he may not eat of the bread and drink of the cup.  This is a pretty logical deduction, right? Credobaptists would adamantly agree.  Acts 2:38 says, "Repent and be baptized...&quo

Why do you go to church on Sunday?

Why do you go to church on Sunday?  I would assume there are many reasons, but what is the primary reason that you get up on a cold, snowy Sunday morning and get your butt to church?  Further, why has the Church of Jesus Christ consistently gathered together on Sundays (among other days) for the last 2000 years? Throughout my 34 years of church attendance I would have proffered a variety of answers to that question.  As a child I'm sure I went to church because I had to, to see my cousins (who happened to be my best friends), to get bread and wine (weekly communion for the win), etc.  As my faith matured in adulthood these reasons remained, hopefully deepening, but to them were added concepts like rest and theological training. As I moved into Anglicanism I was struck by the deliberate focus on worship .  Why do Christians gather on Sunday morning?  To worship God!  Are teaching and fellowship important?  Absolutely!  Are they aspects of worship?  Certainly!  Is either the primary