Skip to main content

Black and White

    Black vs. white.  Cop vs. civilian.  Us vs. them.  When we start thinking like that, we've already lost.  We've already let the establishment beat us when we divide over racial and social issues.  We've already let the media manipulate us when we hate each other.

    Cops aren't out there looking to kill black people.  Certainly there are some cops who are racists, but your average police officer does not harbor ill will for every black person he sees.  Police brutality does occur, and it ought to be punished appropriately, but rioting in the streets and gunning down "pigs" is not the solution.  Blind faith in our police force is hardly advisable, but most cops don't want wake up in the morning hoping to make the news because they shot someone.  There will be bad eggs.  For example, there was a local cop in Canton, OH who made the news for all the wrong reasons when he harassed a driver with a concealed carry license.  One of my friends had an unfortunate run-in with this very same cop.  My friend was treated harshly.  My friend is white.  Bad cops are bad cops.  They should be punished and removed from duty.  Let's not automatically assume every shooting is part of a war on black men.

    On the other hand, all black people who are mistreated by police are not criminals--even when they're criminals.  That's what makes it so hard to decide how to react to the recent videos, particularly the Alton Sterling videos.  It's admittedly more difficult to empathize with a man who has prior legal issues.  This does not, however, justify police officers in killing a man who did not deserve to die.  Even if he was engaged in an illegal activity (it sounds like he was selling bootleg CDs/DVDs and carrying an illegal weapon), he should not be harmed if he was not a direct threat to anyone's life at that moment.  Our legal system is supposed to guarantee justice for everyone, even bad people. Law enforcement has no right to function as the judge, jury, and executioner.  The cornerstone of Biblical justice is the principle that the punishment must fit the crime.  Our nation inherited that principle.  Unless a criminal appears to be (sometimes it's difficult to tell) a threat to the livelihood of those around him, he should be detained as peacefully as possible.

    Patience.  We all just need a little patience.  When a shooting occurs, maybe we should wait a few hours before shotgunning our emotions on social media outlets.  Even when we have video evidence, we should be patient.  Remember how NBC edited that 911 call to make it sound like George Zimmerman was a racist.  Yeah, you can't always trust what you see on the news.  Also remember that no video shows every angle or every minute of an event.  Both videos of Alton Sterling's death are difficult to see and fail to show what preceded the take-down.   Before we go caterwauling on Facebook, we need to wait until the entire story emerges.  More video will probably come out to complement what already exists.  More eyewitness accounts will clarify the precise series of events. Don't automatically assume the cops are guilty.  Don't automatically assume the black guy was a criminal.  Don't prematurely assume the shooting was racially motivated.  Many times the police are shown to be justified in their actions.  Other times they are not. Sometimes cops get away with murder.  It's an unfortunate reality.  What we must never do, however, is circumvent justice in the name of justice.  We must never jump to conclusions that this shooting was unjustified and that this cop is a racist just because injustices have occurred in the past.  That's no better than assuming the guilt of the black man that the cops just shot.

    Let me clarify one thing.  I understand why black Americans are upset.  I can't fault them for it. This country does have a history of racism and discrimination (though most countries do and most people groups have experienced discrimination).  Once again, however, we must never circumvent justice in the name of justice.

Things to remember:

All white people aren't racists.

All cops aren't bad people and/or racists.

All black people aren't criminals.

Having a Facebook doesn't make you an expert at anything.

Overreaction is rarely productive.

The pigment of our skins means nothing.

All lives matter.




Comments

Popular posts from this blog

4 Reasons I Affirm Paedocommunion

If you have interacted with me on social media, you know that I have always been outspoken on the issue of Paedocommunion .  It is a theological position and a liturgical practice about which I am passionate.  Having been raised, and having raised my children, at the Table, I cannot imagine attending a church that didn't allow PC.  I hope that when I am old and gray, I will still be an advocate for bringing little children to the Sacrament. Throughout the 12 years that I have had this blog, I have written scattered thoughts on the topic, but it appears that I have never written a concise summary of my reasons for affirming PC.  I was thoroughly convinced that I had, but I can't seem to locate it, so I guess I never did.  So, to rectify the omission, here are four reasons I hold to PC. 1) Paedocommunion is Biblical.   Any discussion of the topic should start here, and I would hope that both sides of the debate would make this assertion.  However, let me clarify what I mean when

1 Corinthians, the Covenant Hermeneutic, & Paedocommunion

As an adherent to Paedocommunion  (hereafter PC), I have always found it painfully ironic that Credocommunionists use 1 Corinthians 11 to withhold children (among others) from the Table.  One can imagine St. Paul shaking his head as he watches theologians using his discussion of unity at the Table to divide the body at the Table.  You're missing the point! he would say in exasperation.  Not only does 1 Corinthians 11 not forbid PC; I would go so far as to say that there is no better defense of PC in the New Testament than the epistle of 1 Corinthians. Credocommunionist logic is pretty straightforward.  1 Corinthians 11:28 says, "Let a person examine himself, then, and so eat of the bread and drink of the cup."  If, they argue, one is unable to fulfill the exhortation to examine himself, then he may not eat of the bread and drink of the cup.  This is a pretty logical deduction, right? Credobaptists would adamantly agree.  Acts 2:38 says, "Repent and be baptized...&quo

Why do you go to church on Sunday?

Why do you go to church on Sunday?  I would assume there are many reasons, but what is the primary reason that you get up on a cold, snowy Sunday morning and get your butt to church?  Further, why has the Church of Jesus Christ consistently gathered together on Sundays (among other days) for the last 2000 years? Throughout my 34 years of church attendance I would have proffered a variety of answers to that question.  As a child I'm sure I went to church because I had to, to see my cousins (who happened to be my best friends), to get bread and wine (weekly communion for the win), etc.  As my faith matured in adulthood these reasons remained, hopefully deepening, but to them were added concepts like rest and theological training. As I moved into Anglicanism I was struck by the deliberate focus on worship .  Why do Christians gather on Sunday morning?  To worship God!  Are teaching and fellowship important?  Absolutely!  Are they aspects of worship?  Certainly!  Is either the primary