Skip to main content

Matthew 26:26-29

Now as they were eating, Jesus took bread, and after blessing it broke it and gave it to the disciples, and said, “Take, eat; this is my body.” And he took a cup, and when he had given thanks he gave it to them, saying, “Drink of it, all of you, for this is my blood of the covenant, which is poured out for many for the forgiveness of sins. I tell you I will not drink again of this fruit of the vine until that day when I drink it new with you in my Father’s kingdom.”

    There are certain implications that one's eschatological view has on their interpretation practical application of certain passages of the Bible.  This is one such passage.  The "Bible" church I attended (essentially a baptist church" had quarterly communion (such rare observance is one practical implication) and the pastor always made sure to mention that the empty chair at the end of the table was for Jesus, who will return any moment to share this meal with his people for the first time in His Kingdom.  Obviously, at the base of this view is the idea that Jesus has yet to establish His Kingdom, which is rooted in a lack of understanding of the nature of the Kingdom. 

    The truth is that Jesus dines with us every time we have communion (every week for the author of this blog).  He meets with us in His sacrament and imparts relational grace thereby.  A verse that we proclaim widely and yet misunderstand entirely is Revelation 3:20-21. "Behold, I stand at the door and knock. If anyone hears my voice and opens the door, I will come in to him and eat with him, and he with me. The one who conquers, I will grant him to sit with me on my throne, as I also conquered and sat down with my Father on his throne."  Jesus clearly says that He will eat with us.  This is a clear reference to the Lord's Table.  There is simply no reason to think otherwise.  Jesus gives this promise to a local church in the first century.  The promise is just as true with us.  As we commune over the body of Christ with our fellow believers, we commune with the One whose body we eagerly (or depressingly, as is usually the case today--another side-effect of our misunderstanding of the Lord's Table) devour.  The Lord's Supper is a meal of victory and we are to rejoice as we draw strength and encouragement from our Savior who gave His flesh and blood for us.

    Jesus also promises us that we will sit with Him on the throne.  Who sits on a throne?  A king.  As we speak, Jesus occupies the throne of the universe, and, amazingly, promises us that we can reign with Him.  A failure to understand that the Kingdom has come leads us to let this promise hang unclaimed.  Christ reigns through His Church.  We are to take dominion in His name, claiming souls and societies for Christ.  At the Lord's Supper, we partake in Kingly dining.  We are royalty!  As Revelation 5:10 says, "And have made us to our God kings and priests: and we shall reign on the earth."  This is not something that has yet to occur.  It is a present reality.  We are reigning.  Revelation 1:6 states this as something that Christ has already done, as does 1 Peter 2:9. 

    We need to stop messing around and start acting like ambassadors of the Kingdom of Jesus Christ.  We need to get rid of this mindset that the Church is bound to fail and we just need to save some souls before we get raptured.  We need to take dominion of this world for Christ.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

4 Reasons I Affirm Paedocommunion

If you have interacted with me on social media, you know that I have always been outspoken on the issue of Paedocommunion .  It is a theological position and a liturgical practice about which I am passionate.  Having been raised, and having raised my children, at the Table, I cannot imagine attending a church that didn't allow PC.  I hope that when I am old and gray, I will still be an advocate for bringing little children to the Sacrament. Throughout the 12 years that I have had this blog, I have written scattered thoughts on the topic, but it appears that I have never written a concise summary of my reasons for affirming PC.  I was thoroughly convinced that I had, but I can't seem to locate it, so I guess I never did.  So, to rectify the omission, here are four reasons I hold to PC. 1) Paedocommunion is Biblical.   Any discussion of the topic should start here, and I would hope that both sides of the debate would make this assertion.  However, let me clarify what I mean when

1 Corinthians, the Covenant Hermeneutic, & Paedocommunion

As an adherent to Paedocommunion  (hereafter PC), I have always found it painfully ironic that Credocommunionists use 1 Corinthians 11 to withhold children (among others) from the Table.  One can imagine St. Paul shaking his head as he watches theologians using his discussion of unity at the Table to divide the body at the Table.  You're missing the point! he would say in exasperation.  Not only does 1 Corinthians 11 not forbid PC; I would go so far as to say that there is no better defense of PC in the New Testament than the epistle of 1 Corinthians. Credocommunionist logic is pretty straightforward.  1 Corinthians 11:28 says, "Let a person examine himself, then, and so eat of the bread and drink of the cup."  If, they argue, one is unable to fulfill the exhortation to examine himself, then he may not eat of the bread and drink of the cup.  This is a pretty logical deduction, right? Credobaptists would adamantly agree.  Acts 2:38 says, "Repent and be baptized...&quo

Why do you go to church on Sunday?

Why do you go to church on Sunday?  I would assume there are many reasons, but what is the primary reason that you get up on a cold, snowy Sunday morning and get your butt to church?  Further, why has the Church of Jesus Christ consistently gathered together on Sundays (among other days) for the last 2000 years? Throughout my 34 years of church attendance I would have proffered a variety of answers to that question.  As a child I'm sure I went to church because I had to, to see my cousins (who happened to be my best friends), to get bread and wine (weekly communion for the win), etc.  As my faith matured in adulthood these reasons remained, hopefully deepening, but to them were added concepts like rest and theological training. As I moved into Anglicanism I was struck by the deliberate focus on worship .  Why do Christians gather on Sunday morning?  To worship God!  Are teaching and fellowship important?  Absolutely!  Are they aspects of worship?  Certainly!  Is either the primary