Skip to main content

Matthew 26:26-29

Now as they were eating, Jesus took bread, and after blessing it broke it and gave it to the disciples, and said, “Take, eat; this is my body.” And he took a cup, and when he had given thanks he gave it to them, saying, “Drink of it, all of you, for this is my blood of the covenant, which is poured out for many for the forgiveness of sins. I tell you I will not drink again of this fruit of the vine until that day when I drink it new with you in my Father’s kingdom.”

    There are certain implications that one's eschatological view has on their interpretation practical application of certain passages of the Bible.  This is one such passage.  The "Bible" church I attended (essentially a baptist church" had quarterly communion (such rare observance is one practical implication) and the pastor always made sure to mention that the empty chair at the end of the table was for Jesus, who will return any moment to share this meal with his people for the first time in His Kingdom.  Obviously, at the base of this view is the idea that Jesus has yet to establish His Kingdom, which is rooted in a lack of understanding of the nature of the Kingdom. 

    The truth is that Jesus dines with us every time we have communion (every week for the author of this blog).  He meets with us in His sacrament and imparts relational grace thereby.  A verse that we proclaim widely and yet misunderstand entirely is Revelation 3:20-21. "Behold, I stand at the door and knock. If anyone hears my voice and opens the door, I will come in to him and eat with him, and he with me. The one who conquers, I will grant him to sit with me on my throne, as I also conquered and sat down with my Father on his throne."  Jesus clearly says that He will eat with us.  This is a clear reference to the Lord's Table.  There is simply no reason to think otherwise.  Jesus gives this promise to a local church in the first century.  The promise is just as true with us.  As we commune over the body of Christ with our fellow believers, we commune with the One whose body we eagerly (or depressingly, as is usually the case today--another side-effect of our misunderstanding of the Lord's Table) devour.  The Lord's Supper is a meal of victory and we are to rejoice as we draw strength and encouragement from our Savior who gave His flesh and blood for us.

    Jesus also promises us that we will sit with Him on the throne.  Who sits on a throne?  A king.  As we speak, Jesus occupies the throne of the universe, and, amazingly, promises us that we can reign with Him.  A failure to understand that the Kingdom has come leads us to let this promise hang unclaimed.  Christ reigns through His Church.  We are to take dominion in His name, claiming souls and societies for Christ.  At the Lord's Supper, we partake in Kingly dining.  We are royalty!  As Revelation 5:10 says, "And have made us to our God kings and priests: and we shall reign on the earth."  This is not something that has yet to occur.  It is a present reality.  We are reigning.  Revelation 1:6 states this as something that Christ has already done, as does 1 Peter 2:9. 

    We need to stop messing around and start acting like ambassadors of the Kingdom of Jesus Christ.  We need to get rid of this mindset that the Church is bound to fail and we just need to save some souls before we get raptured.  We need to take dominion of this world for Christ.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

4 Reasons I Affirm Paedocommunion

If you have interacted with me on social media, you know that I have always been outspoken on the issue of Paedocommunion .  It is a theological position and a liturgical practice about which I am passionate.  Having been raised, and having raised my children, at the Table, I cannot imagine attending a church that didn't allow PC.  I hope that when I am old and gray, I will still be an advocate for bringing little children to the Sacrament. Throughout the 12 years that I have had this blog, I have written scattered thoughts on the topic, but it appears that I have never written a concise summary of my reasons for affirming PC.  I was thoroughly convinced that I had, but I can't seem to locate it, so I guess I never did.  So, to rectify the omission, here are four reasons I hold to PC. 1) Paedocommunion is Biblical.   Any discussion of the topic should start here, and I would hope that both sides of the debate would make this assertion.  However, l...

The Real Presence & Paedocommunion: A Deeper Rift Between Reformed Churches

You're going back to Rome! Theological disagreements within the Reformed world, especially those of the last half century, often devolve into these sorts of accusations.  As controversialists like Doug Wilson and Peter Leithart began to break away from the larger conservative Presbyterian and Reformed denominations, it became clear that the rift was deeper than semantics and systematic minutiae.  Much like the Reformation four centuries before, the Table was a primary point of conflict.   What does it mean?  Who may partake?  What do we call it?    These questions, along with a few more, divided Reformed brethren as the physical elements of our religion reflected deeper conflicts.  Good men began to understand that the problem wasn't just in our logos, but in our pathos and ethos, as well. Paedocommunion (hereafter PC) has been one of the hottest points of contention.  PC has always been normal to me as I grew up with it.  I underst...

Anglicanism, Paedocommunion, & Being Reformed

I consider myself Reformed.  I was baptized as a baby in a PCA church.  I grew up in a Reformed microdenomination that allowed its member churches to subscribe to any of the Reformed confessions (we subscribed to the Three Forms of Unity).  In many ways, whether I like it or not, I still think and act like a Reformed Presbyterian.   Some, however, would seek to deny me that label.  I suspect there are many reasons for this, but paramount among them is that I hold to Paedocommunion (hereafter PC), which, for some reason, is absolutely the worst thing ever to these people.  Some would go so far as to say that PC makes me a heretic, but they all agree that I am certainly not Reformed .   My recent engagement with these opponents of PC has caused me to reflect on what it means to be Reformed and what it means to be a Christian.  This online jousting has dovetailed well with some of my recent study, particularly  An Apology of the Church...