Skip to main content

2 Corinthians 10:3-5

"For though we walk in the flesh, we are not waging war according to the flesh. For the weapons of our warfare are not of the flesh but have divine power to destroy strongholds. We destroy arguments and every lofty opinion raised against the knowledge of God, and take every thought captive to obey Christ."

Here comes a rant.

    Firstly, why do we think that it's okay that we can splinter our lives and give one section to God and keep one of them for ourselves?  We must give ourselves entirely over to God.  There is no such thing as a secular/religious dinstinction.  It is about as Biblical as the concept of adolescence!  All of life is religious.  All of what we think, do, and say ought to be regulated by God's commandments and principles. 

    Secondly, why do we still believe in this farce known as neutrality?  Supposedly God doesn't care about our entertainment, or our employment, or, for Pete's sake, our education!  Why do still have our kids in a school system that has banned God?  What kind of witnessing can we do when we begin by compromising God's standards?  It's not okay simply to say that your local school has many Christian faculty members.  God requires not neutrality or passivity in education, but an education system that exalts and glorifies Him.  If your children are attending a state funded school (even privately run, chartered schools), then they are being taught from state certified textbooks.  These textbooks ignore God.  Not mentioning God negatively is not good enough (although I think we all know these do).  Implying (or explicitly saying it) that education is possible apart from knowledge of God is dishonoring and blasphemous to our God, in whom we live and move and have our being. 

    This principle applies at work and at home, too.  It's not enough to hope that the topic of God never comes up.  We are to active Christians in every environment.  I'm not suggesting that we "force our religion down their throats."  What I am suggesting is that our words and our actions, wherever we may be, must declare the truth that there is a God and He is watching! 

    Back to public schools.  How can we fulfill this verse of Scripture by telling public schools it's okay that they hate God?  We don't actually say this, but we demonstrate it by accepting the free (so called) education they provide.  So you speak out against evolution?  Well, do you speak out in math and social studies, too?  God is sovereign over those as well and must be acknowledged when studying them.  Any thought that opposes God must be rejected! 

    Why attend a school where you have to disagree constantly with your teachers?  That's like attending a Catholic Church, just because you live next door.  We must remember that kids go to school to learn, not to witness.  I'm sick and stinkin' tired of that excuse (which is exactly what it is)!  It's a justification.  Kids aren't missionaries!  We don't send our soldiers over to Iraq to learn how to fight from terrorists, do we?  Well, we do with our kids.  Kids don't teach--teachers do.  Saying otherwise is nonsense.  I know, money talks.  That's what's really important.  And football is, too.  And opportunities for careers that earn a ton of money.  That's the heart of the matter and we all know it. 

    I'm not saying we should evangelize.  Kids, feel free to go to public schools after hours and evangelize!  Tell them about Christian and home schools.  But kids go to school learn--that is the simple truth of the matter, and at public schools God is banned.  Why is this even an issue?  Who can really say that God wants His children in schools that hate Him?  Education of children is a big issue to God.  Children are impressionable.  What you teach them they will believe, and that is why training them properly is so important.  Telling yourself that they will witness to other kids and teachers and that you can supplement their education at home with the Bible simply isn't enough. 

My rant is over.

   

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

4 Reasons I Affirm Paedocommunion

If you have interacted with me on social media, you know that I have always been outspoken on the issue of Paedocommunion .  It is a theological position and a liturgical practice about which I am passionate.  Having been raised, and having raised my children, at the Table, I cannot imagine attending a church that didn't allow PC.  I hope that when I am old and gray, I will still be an advocate for bringing little children to the Sacrament. Throughout the 12 years that I have had this blog, I have written scattered thoughts on the topic, but it appears that I have never written a concise summary of my reasons for affirming PC.  I was thoroughly convinced that I had, but I can't seem to locate it, so I guess I never did.  So, to rectify the omission, here are four reasons I hold to PC. 1) Paedocommunion is Biblical.   Any discussion of the topic should start here, and I would hope that both sides of the debate would make this assertion.  However, let me clarify what I mean when

1 Corinthians, the Covenant Hermeneutic, & Paedocommunion

As an adherent to Paedocommunion  (hereafter PC), I have always found it painfully ironic that Credocommunionists use 1 Corinthians 11 to withhold children (among others) from the Table.  One can imagine St. Paul shaking his head as he watches theologians using his discussion of unity at the Table to divide the body at the Table.  You're missing the point! he would say in exasperation.  Not only does 1 Corinthians 11 not forbid PC; I would go so far as to say that there is no better defense of PC in the New Testament than the epistle of 1 Corinthians. Credocommunionist logic is pretty straightforward.  1 Corinthians 11:28 says, "Let a person examine himself, then, and so eat of the bread and drink of the cup."  If, they argue, one is unable to fulfill the exhortation to examine himself, then he may not eat of the bread and drink of the cup.  This is a pretty logical deduction, right? Credobaptists would adamantly agree.  Acts 2:38 says, "Repent and be baptized...&quo

Why do you go to church on Sunday?

Why do you go to church on Sunday?  I would assume there are many reasons, but what is the primary reason that you get up on a cold, snowy Sunday morning and get your butt to church?  Further, why has the Church of Jesus Christ consistently gathered together on Sundays (among other days) for the last 2000 years? Throughout my 34 years of church attendance I would have proffered a variety of answers to that question.  As a child I'm sure I went to church because I had to, to see my cousins (who happened to be my best friends), to get bread and wine (weekly communion for the win), etc.  As my faith matured in adulthood these reasons remained, hopefully deepening, but to them were added concepts like rest and theological training. As I moved into Anglicanism I was struck by the deliberate focus on worship .  Why do Christians gather on Sunday morning?  To worship God!  Are teaching and fellowship important?  Absolutely!  Are they aspects of worship?  Certainly!  Is either the primary