Skip to main content

Luke 13:18-21

He said therefore, “What is the kingdom of God like? And to what shall I compare it? It is like a grain of mustard seed that a man took and sowed in his garden, and it grew and became a tree, and the birds of the air made nests in its branches.”
And again he said, “To what shall I compare the kingdom of God? It is like leaven that a woman took and hid in three measures of flour, until it was all leavened.”

    Jesus spends a considerable amount of time discussing the Kingdom of God/Heaven throughout His three-year teaching ministry.  His first "sermon" is short and to this very point: "Now after John was arrested, Jesus came into Galilee, proclaiming the gospel of God, and saying, “The time is fulfilled, and the kingdom of God is at hand; repent and believe in the gospel" (Mark 1:14-15).  The Kingdom, to Him, was not a trivial, secondary matter as it has become to the modern Church.  The Kingdom of God was constantly at the center of His mind and on the tip of His tongue. 

   In Luke 17:21 Jesus says, "Nor will they say, ‘Look, here it is!’ or ‘There!’ for behold, the kingdom of God is in the midst of you.”  What, where, and what type of Kingdom Jesus was bringing is highly controversial these days.  Jesus, however, made it clear that the Kingdom of God was nigh at hand at the time of His incarnation.  The Kingdom came.  God's plans were not thwarted or postponed.  The Kingdom was merely taken away from the Jews and given to the Church.  It is a spiritual Kingdom, which necessarily has physical, social, and political ramifications.

    But that is really not what this passage is about, nor is that my aim in quoting this passage.  My aim is to demonstrate the nature of the Kingdom's growth and duration.  Many people mistake the Bible's concept of the Kingdom coming.  They picture the Kingdom as coming in a fell, politically notable swoop.  This, however, is not what Jesus says.  He says it is like a mustard seed, which is small, which grows into a tree large enough for birds to perch in.  He says it is like leaven, which seems insignificant, but grows and changes the bread around it.  (As a sidenote, communion bread with leaven is not wrong.  Leaven does not always signify sin.  It signifies growth, which is as true of sin as it is of the Kingdom, as demonstrated by Jesus in the passage at hand.)

    The Kingdom came with the Advent of Jesus Christ and it continues to grow in all the corners of the world.  It grows in number, in influence, and in holiness.  Jesus, right before He ascended, claimed to have been given "all power in Heaven and in Earth" (Matthew 28:18).  The Kingdom is in the midst of us, even as it was in the midst of the Jews. 

    Take the time (right now, if possible) to read the entire chapter of Daniel 2.  It describes a Kingdom that would be set up directly after the fall of the fourth Kingdom pictured in Nebuchadnezzar's dream of a giant statue.  That fourth Kingdom was clearly Rome, and it was directly after Rome that Christ's Kingdom was set up.  His Kingdom knocked down the world power machine that the world experienced up to that point.  Quite significantly, however, is that the Kingdom was not established in all its grandeur.  It was established as a stone--a little, seemingly meaningless stone--that became a mountain that filled the whole earth.  This growth was progressive and gradual.  The Kingdom of God grows in just this way.  It, just like that small stone, will grow to fill the earth. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

4 Reasons I Affirm Paedocommunion

If you have interacted with me on social media, you know that I have always been outspoken on the issue of Paedocommunion .  It is a theological position and a liturgical practice about which I am passionate.  Having been raised, and having raised my children, at the Table, I cannot imagine attending a church that didn't allow PC.  I hope that when I am old and gray, I will still be an advocate for bringing little children to the Sacrament. Throughout the 12 years that I have had this blog, I have written scattered thoughts on the topic, but it appears that I have never written a concise summary of my reasons for affirming PC.  I was thoroughly convinced that I had, but I can't seem to locate it, so I guess I never did.  So, to rectify the omission, here are four reasons I hold to PC. 1) Paedocommunion is Biblical.   Any discussion of the topic should start here, and I would hope that both sides of the debate would make this assertion.  However, let me clarify what I mean when

1 Corinthians, the Covenant Hermeneutic, & Paedocommunion

As an adherent to Paedocommunion  (hereafter PC), I have always found it painfully ironic that Credocommunionists use 1 Corinthians 11 to withhold children (among others) from the Table.  One can imagine St. Paul shaking his head as he watches theologians using his discussion of unity at the Table to divide the body at the Table.  You're missing the point! he would say in exasperation.  Not only does 1 Corinthians 11 not forbid PC; I would go so far as to say that there is no better defense of PC in the New Testament than the epistle of 1 Corinthians. Credocommunionist logic is pretty straightforward.  1 Corinthians 11:28 says, "Let a person examine himself, then, and so eat of the bread and drink of the cup."  If, they argue, one is unable to fulfill the exhortation to examine himself, then he may not eat of the bread and drink of the cup.  This is a pretty logical deduction, right? Credobaptists would adamantly agree.  Acts 2:38 says, "Repent and be baptized...&quo

Why do you go to church on Sunday?

Why do you go to church on Sunday?  I would assume there are many reasons, but what is the primary reason that you get up on a cold, snowy Sunday morning and get your butt to church?  Further, why has the Church of Jesus Christ consistently gathered together on Sundays (among other days) for the last 2000 years? Throughout my 34 years of church attendance I would have proffered a variety of answers to that question.  As a child I'm sure I went to church because I had to, to see my cousins (who happened to be my best friends), to get bread and wine (weekly communion for the win), etc.  As my faith matured in adulthood these reasons remained, hopefully deepening, but to them were added concepts like rest and theological training. As I moved into Anglicanism I was struck by the deliberate focus on worship .  Why do Christians gather on Sunday morning?  To worship God!  Are teaching and fellowship important?  Absolutely!  Are they aspects of worship?  Certainly!  Is either the primary