Skip to main content

"The More Things Change..." or "Joe Biden Doing Joe Biden Things"

1 Samuel 2 relates the story of Eli, the well-meaning high priest whose only flaw (apparently) was his refusal to discipline his sons.  These sons, described as worthless men, utilized their position to abuse the people and indulge their lusts with impunity.  Eli's dereliction of duty brought his otherwise noble career in service to God's house to an ignominious end.  

There are, of course, important differences between Eli and Joe Biden.  Joe Biden is not a religious leader (though he is a practicing Roman Catholic), nor would I consider his record to be otherwise spotless.  However, similarly to Eli, Biden's pardoning of his own worthless son, Hunter, will prove to be his legacy.  His long (and I mean loooong) career in politics will likely be overshadowed, even in the eyes of those who previously respected him, by this one shameless act.  By pardoning his son despite promising not to, Biden has yet again demonstrated that some people are, in fact, above the law.

I generally don't consider myself a prescient political commentator, but four years ago I shared what I thought was many Americans' primary motivation for supporting Donald Trump, namely, the average Joe (pun fully intended) was deeply resentful of America's unofficial aristocracy.  As the nation watched Hunter embroil the Bidens in scandal, Americans showed that they had simply had enough of people getting away with crimes just because they happened to have the right last name.  Still, Biden went on to win the election (allegedly--but we don't have time for that).    

Similarly, in 2016, while Hillary Clinton was dealing with her own set of scandals, I confidently wrote that nothing would ever come of it (I am happy to note that my comments about Trump at that time have proven to be mostly untrue).  She, too, is an insider.  She, too, is above the law because of her last name.  She, too, is part of our unofficial aristocracy. 

The point here is not that I was right.  After all, it takes no particular genius to acknowledge the obvious.  The point is simply that, the more things change, the more they stay the same; or, as Ecclesiastes puts it, there is nothing new under the sun.  Here we are, in the 21st Century, firmly implanted in the Age of Technology, two and a half centuries after the American War for Independence, and politicians are still corrupt.  Our public servants are still enriching themselves and their families off the backs of their constituents.  The powerful elites are still above the law.  

In other words, of course Joe Biden pardoned his son!  Is anyone really surprised?  I don't know that much about civics and politics, but I know a little bit about human nature.  As long as human beings have the opportunity to abuse others, they will.  As long as the promise of power and fortune is held out, people will step over others to attain it.  As long as the world, the flesh, and the devil exist, good men will fall and bad men will revel.  

As long as Congress can exempt itself from laws, they will.  

Some people have this false notion of Progress.  They idealistically place their trust in words like Democracy and Accountability, but, here were are.  Eli lived about 3000 years before Joe Biden, but their sins are the same.  Human nature, apart from the regenerative grace of God, is still the same.    

The more things change, the more they stay the same.

So, too, our hope remains the same.  As unreliable as men are, so much more reliable is our God!  Men will fail us, but our Father never will.  Our Father loves us and provides for us.  Our Father will even chasten us.  Our Father has pardoned us, but He has done so through the punishment of His own innocent Son.    

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

4 Reasons I Affirm Paedocommunion

If you have interacted with me on social media, you know that I have always been outspoken on the issue of Paedocommunion .  It is a theological position and a liturgical practice about which I am passionate.  Having been raised, and having raised my children, at the Table, I cannot imagine attending a church that didn't allow PC.  I hope that when I am old and gray, I will still be an advocate for bringing little children to the Sacrament. Throughout the 12 years that I have had this blog, I have written scattered thoughts on the topic, but it appears that I have never written a concise summary of my reasons for affirming PC.  I was thoroughly convinced that I had, but I can't seem to locate it, so I guess I never did.  So, to rectify the omission, here are four reasons I hold to PC. 1) Paedocommunion is Biblical.   Any discussion of the topic should start here, and I would hope that both sides of the debate would make this assertion.  However, l...

1 Corinthians, the Covenant Hermeneutic, & Paedocommunion

As an adherent to Paedocommunion  (hereafter PC), I have always found it painfully ironic that Credocommunionists use 1 Corinthians 11 to withhold children (among others) from the Table.  One can imagine St. Paul shaking his head as he watches theologians using his discussion of unity at the Table to divide the body at the Table.  You're missing the point! he would say in exasperation.  Not only does 1 Corinthians 11 not forbid PC; I would go so far as to say that there is no better defense of PC in the New Testament than the epistle of 1 Corinthians. Credocommunionist logic is pretty straightforward.  1 Corinthians 11:28 says, "Let a person examine himself, then, and so eat of the bread and drink of the cup."  If, they argue, one is unable to fulfill the exhortation to examine himself, then he may not eat of the bread and drink of the cup.  This is a pretty logical deduction, right? Credobaptists would adamantly agree.  Acts 2:38 says, "Repe...

The Real Presence & Paedocommunion: A Deeper Rift Between Reformed Churches

You're going back to Rome! Theological disagreements within the Reformed world, especially those of the last half century, often devolve into these sorts of accusations.  As controversialists like Doug Wilson and Peter Leithart began to break away from the larger conservative Presbyterian and Reformed denominations, it became clear that the rift was deeper than semantics and systematic minutiae.  Much like the Reformation four centuries before, the Table was a primary point of conflict.   What does it mean?  Who may partake?  What do we call it?    These questions, along with a few more, divided Reformed brethren as the physical elements of our religion reflected deeper conflicts.  Good men began to understand that the problem wasn't just in our logos, but in our pathos and ethos, as well. Paedocommunion (hereafter PC) has been one of the hottest points of contention.  PC has always been normal to me as I grew up with it.  I underst...