Skip to main content

How We View the Law of God

There are a few topics in Christianity that engender more debate than others.  These topics flare up tempers and inspire seemingly-endless ingenuity as we seek to understand them better and clarify our positions more precisely.  One such topic is the law of God.  Some go so far as to say that the Old Testament law holds absolutely no value for the New Testament Christian, while others go to the opposite extreme in believing that the entirety of the law is still binding.  In between these two extremes exist a thousand shades of antinomianism and theonomy.  It seems that every denomination has a slightly different view of the law of God.

I don't want to discuss that today.  In fact, I don't know that I could really commit to an exact description of my own view.  I think the two extremes are, well, extreme, and many of the views in the middle have good points.  It's a complex issue.

One thing I do know, however, is that the Law of God, the Old Testament Torah, is not a bad thing.  I think this is very important to remember.  Many people, even Christians, tend to read the Old Testament laws as oppressive, outdated, and superstitious. We can debate what parts of the Law apply to us today, as well as how they apply to us, but we must spurn any interpretation that views the law as inherently a bad thing.  It's difficult to read passages like Psalm 19 and condone this pervasive view.  David says that the law is perfect, pure, clean, and more desirable than gold and honey!  That doesn't sound like the words of someone who feels oppressed by God's commands!

Nevertheless, the New Testament tells us that the law of God was inadequate, not because of its own inherent inferiority, but because mankind was unable to obey it perfectly.  Therein lies the superiority of the Gospel--it is able to overcome the weakness of man!  All the Law can do for sinful mankind is condemn us, but the glory of the Gospel is demonstrated in that it is superior to the law of God, which was glorious in its own right.

As we read the Old Testament Law, if, in fact, we do, it's important to remember why it was put away.  These many laws were not put away because they are oppressive, outdated, or superstitious.  They were put away because something greater has come.  Jesus, the true Lamb of God has come, so we don't need to offer carnal sacrifices anymore.  Jesus, God incarnate, has come and tabernacled among us, so we no longer need a physical Temple in which to worship.  Jesus, the Sabbath of God, has brought us rest, so we no longer need to observe days, months, and years.  The Antitype has been revealed, which leaves the types with no purpose but to teach us more about the Antitype.  The Old Testament laws have been put away, not because the law is bad, but because Christ is better.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

"Father, Forgive Them"

“Father, forgive them, for they know not what they do.” Forgiveness is hard.  Forgiveness is really, really hard. It’s difficult to forgive others who have genuinely harmed or offended us.   It’s easy to say , “I forgive you,” but it’s extremely difficult to feel it–to make peace in our hearts with the injustices that others have perpetrated against us. It just doesn’t feel right.  Sin should be punished!  Wrongs should be righted!  Right?! It’s difficult to forgive others when they ask for it.  It’s even more difficult to forgive them when they haven’t asked for it–when they don’t even recognize what they’ve done to hurt us. As our Savior hung upon His Cross, He asked the Father to forgive those nearby–those who were unwittingly contributing to the greatest injustice in the history of the world. These thieves, soldiers, and standers-by had no idea what was happening.  They had no idea that the jealousy of the Jews had placed Christ on that Cross...

5 Reasons I Want my Wife to Start Wearing a Head Covering during Corporate Worship

    Of late, the issue of head coverings has come up in my circle.  Okay...my cousin and I have been discussing it, but the point is, the issue has been bouncing around my head for the past few days.  It is a topic that I have avoided for some time.  Every time I read through 1 Corinthians, I would tell myself, "We'll get around to that."  The reality is that I didn't want to be "that guy"...that guy who people view as a chauvinistic jerk who wants to make sure everyone--especially his wife--remembers that he's the head of his home.  I think I'm beginning to respect "that guy"--those men who have cared enough to stand for what they believe.     Let me be clear that I am referring to head coverings for women (those old enough to leave them on...)  DURING CORPORATE WORSHIP.  I am not advocating head coverings at all times.  Though I see nothing necessarily wrong that practice, I don't see any command for it either.   ...

Paedocommunion: Consistent Covenantalism or Anti-Confessionalism?

    Being raised as a paedocommunionist (that means our kids get to eat Jesus, too), I have always been amazed by how passionately credocommunionists (that means their kids don't get to eat Jesus until they articulate a "credible" profession of faith) dislike the practice.  I would think that they could look at paedocommunion and at least respect it as an attempt to live out Covenant Theology in a consistent way.  Instead, paedocommunionists have been widely viewed as being on the fringe of the fringe (yes, that far) of Reformed Theology.  I like to think that I have been able to agree-to-disagree in an amicable way with my credocommunionist friends.  However, I will admit that being discounted as "unconfessional" (trust me, I've been called worse) has made many paedocommunionists (you'd have to ask my friends whether or not that applies to me) act in a manner that lacks Christian grace.     So, the question remains, is paedocommunion a view hel...