Skip to main content

Some Thoughts on the Vice Presidential Debate

    As if it weren't painful enough to endure Trump and Hillary bashing each other, we were forced (okay, no one forced me to watch, but none of the other channels were airing much of anything to compete with it) to watch their running mates bash the presidential candidates as well.  This debate felt practically the same, with the exception of their candidates' posture (they sat at a round table as opposed to standing behind podiums--that seems like a weird psychological thing).  Here are a few observations from what was essentially a rerun of the Presidential debate.

    1) Kaine quoted Scripture against Trump and it actually made sense.  That's your presidential candidate, Republicans!  I guess you can officially dismiss any lingering doubt about whether or not the Republican party is the party for conservative Christians.  It's not.

    2) Kaine was infinitely better prepared than Pence, at least during the second half.  He literally had his responses numbered (cue the conspiracy theorists).  I think Pence is probably a better, smarter guy, but he often came across ill-prepared, in my eyes anyway.  This reminded me of Trump against Hillary.  Neither Trump nor Pence really had substantive responses to the initial questions or their opponents' challenges.  I think Pence's lack here is probably due to Trump's general dearth of actual policies or plans, something Kaine pointed out (and something the other Republican candidates pointed out in the primary debates).  Now, Kaine's well-rehearsed answers didn't really provide real details for how they would do what they say they'll do, but at least he presented ideas.  As far as debating goes, he won easily just based on that.

    3) Kaine is the better politician, just like Hillary.  Pence has a stronger history in politics than Trump, but neither have the polish of their opponents.  They must (and have been) point this out to have any shot at winning.  If you can't beat them at their own game, you have to change the game. Trump and Pence must present themselves as honest, real-world people who want to make a difference.  

    4) Kaine has absolutely no problem lying.  He knows people can't begin to fact check the litany of claims he made about Trump.  We all know some of them are based in fact, so we're prone to accept them at face value.  It's easy to paint a picture of Trump as a belligerent fool because we've all seen and heard much of the crap that spews out of his mouth.  

    5) Pence doesn't have great hair, but it is definitely better than Trump's.

    6) That moderator was uninteresting.  Who is she and how did she get that job?  Oh yeah, and she was pretty biased.

    7) Pence had major trouble defending Trump.  Resorting to the argument that he is not a polished politician really comes off as weak.  When Pence was first chosen, I had my doubts about anyone who would run alongside Trump.  How can anyone even begin to defend the words that have come out of Trump's mouth, let alone his character?  To call him a loose cannon is hilariously understated.  I don't think even he believes half the crap that comes out of his mouth!  This leaves Pence in an awkward position.  Pence ends up looking bad because he's trying to defend a Cretan.

    8) Kaine's defense of Hillary was even less convincing.  There were multiple times when he resorted to the argument that Hillary had been cleared of charges by the FBI and other investigative bodies.  Well, first off, that is sort of a half-truth.  Hillary has admitted to making a mistake in using a private email server to communicate classified documents.  In other words, she has admitted to committing a crime.  Even besides that though, the argument is ridiculous.  The government investigated stuff that Hillary did when she was part of the government and decided not to do anything about it.  Yeah, I'll trust that.  The American people do not believe that Hillary Clinton plays by the same rules.  We don't believe that she receives the same consequences that normal people do. We certainly don't trust Obama's justice department to bring her to justice!  Who can blame them? They're just interested in self-preservation!  

    9) Can we just have Pence run against Kaine for the presidency?

    10) Debates accomplish absolutely nothing.  Are undecided voters really swayed by what they hear?  Do they even exist in this election.  The undecided class has been replaced by apathetic citizens who would rather watch sports and scroll down their Facebook walls.  If you're a voter, you're opinion wasn't changed by watching either of these debates.  Jim Bob McGee is still voting for Trump.  Feminists are still voting for Hillary.  I'm still voting for Jim Harbaugh.

#jimharbaughforpresident




Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

"Father, Forgive Them"

“Father, forgive them, for they know not what they do.” Forgiveness is hard.  Forgiveness is really, really hard. It’s difficult to forgive others who have genuinely harmed or offended us.   It’s easy to say , “I forgive you,” but it’s extremely difficult to feel it–to make peace in our hearts with the injustices that others have perpetrated against us. It just doesn’t feel right.  Sin should be punished!  Wrongs should be righted!  Right?! It’s difficult to forgive others when they ask for it.  It’s even more difficult to forgive them when they haven’t asked for it–when they don’t even recognize what they’ve done to hurt us. As our Savior hung upon His Cross, He asked the Father to forgive those nearby–those who were unwittingly contributing to the greatest injustice in the history of the world. These thieves, soldiers, and standers-by had no idea what was happening.  They had no idea that the jealousy of the Jews had placed Christ on that Cross...
Post a Comment
Read more

The Real Presence & Paedocommunion: A Deeper Rift Between Reformed Churches

You're going back to Rome! Theological disagreements within the Reformed world, especially those of the last half century, often devolve into these sorts of accusations.  As controversialists like Doug Wilson and Peter Leithart began to break away from the larger conservative Presbyterian and Reformed denominations, it became clear that the rift was deeper than semantics and systematic minutiae.  Much like the Reformation four centuries before, the Table was a primary point of conflict.   What does it mean?  Who may partake?  What do we call it?    These questions, along with a few more, divided Reformed brethren as the physical elements of our religion reflected deeper conflicts.  Good men began to understand that the problem wasn't just in our logos, but in our pathos and ethos, as well. Paedocommunion (hereafter PC) has been one of the hottest points of contention.  PC has always been normal to me as I grew up with it.  I underst...
Post a Comment
Read more

"The More Things Change..." or "Joe Biden Doing Joe Biden Things"

1 Samuel 2  relates the story of Eli, the well-meaning high priest whose only flaw (apparently) was his refusal to discipline his sons.  These sons, described as worthless men , utilized their position to abuse the people and indulge their lusts with impunity.  Eli's dereliction of duty brought his otherwise noble career in service to God's house to an ignominious end.   There are, of course, important differences between Eli and Joe Biden.  Joe Biden is not a religious leader (though he is a practicing Roman Catholic ), nor would I consider his record to be otherwise spotless.  However, similarly to Eli,  Biden's pardoning of his own  worthless son, Hunter, will prove to be his legacy.  His long (and I mean loooong) career in politics will likely be overshadowed, even in the eyes of those who previously respected him, by this one shameless act.  By pardoning his son despite  promising not to, Biden has yet again demonstrate...
Post a Comment
Read more