Skip to main content

Some Thoughts on the Vice Presidential Debate

    As if it weren't painful enough to endure Trump and Hillary bashing each other, we were forced (okay, no one forced me to watch, but none of the other channels were airing much of anything to compete with it) to watch their running mates bash the presidential candidates as well.  This debate felt practically the same, with the exception of their candidates' posture (they sat at a round table as opposed to standing behind podiums--that seems like a weird psychological thing).  Here are a few observations from what was essentially a rerun of the Presidential debate.

    1) Kaine quoted Scripture against Trump and it actually made sense.  That's your presidential candidate, Republicans!  I guess you can officially dismiss any lingering doubt about whether or not the Republican party is the party for conservative Christians.  It's not.

    2) Kaine was infinitely better prepared than Pence, at least during the second half.  He literally had his responses numbered (cue the conspiracy theorists).  I think Pence is probably a better, smarter guy, but he often came across ill-prepared, in my eyes anyway.  This reminded me of Trump against Hillary.  Neither Trump nor Pence really had substantive responses to the initial questions or their opponents' challenges.  I think Pence's lack here is probably due to Trump's general dearth of actual policies or plans, something Kaine pointed out (and something the other Republican candidates pointed out in the primary debates).  Now, Kaine's well-rehearsed answers didn't really provide real details for how they would do what they say they'll do, but at least he presented ideas.  As far as debating goes, he won easily just based on that.

    3) Kaine is the better politician, just like Hillary.  Pence has a stronger history in politics than Trump, but neither have the polish of their opponents.  They must (and have been) point this out to have any shot at winning.  If you can't beat them at their own game, you have to change the game. Trump and Pence must present themselves as honest, real-world people who want to make a difference.  

    4) Kaine has absolutely no problem lying.  He knows people can't begin to fact check the litany of claims he made about Trump.  We all know some of them are based in fact, so we're prone to accept them at face value.  It's easy to paint a picture of Trump as a belligerent fool because we've all seen and heard much of the crap that spews out of his mouth.  

    5) Pence doesn't have great hair, but it is definitely better than Trump's.

    6) That moderator was uninteresting.  Who is she and how did she get that job?  Oh yeah, and she was pretty biased.

    7) Pence had major trouble defending Trump.  Resorting to the argument that he is not a polished politician really comes off as weak.  When Pence was first chosen, I had my doubts about anyone who would run alongside Trump.  How can anyone even begin to defend the words that have come out of Trump's mouth, let alone his character?  To call him a loose cannon is hilariously understated.  I don't think even he believes half the crap that comes out of his mouth!  This leaves Pence in an awkward position.  Pence ends up looking bad because he's trying to defend a Cretan.

    8) Kaine's defense of Hillary was even less convincing.  There were multiple times when he resorted to the argument that Hillary had been cleared of charges by the FBI and other investigative bodies.  Well, first off, that is sort of a half-truth.  Hillary has admitted to making a mistake in using a private email server to communicate classified documents.  In other words, she has admitted to committing a crime.  Even besides that though, the argument is ridiculous.  The government investigated stuff that Hillary did when she was part of the government and decided not to do anything about it.  Yeah, I'll trust that.  The American people do not believe that Hillary Clinton plays by the same rules.  We don't believe that she receives the same consequences that normal people do. We certainly don't trust Obama's justice department to bring her to justice!  Who can blame them? They're just interested in self-preservation!  

    9) Can we just have Pence run against Kaine for the presidency?

    10) Debates accomplish absolutely nothing.  Are undecided voters really swayed by what they hear?  Do they even exist in this election.  The undecided class has been replaced by apathetic citizens who would rather watch sports and scroll down their Facebook walls.  If you're a voter, you're opinion wasn't changed by watching either of these debates.  Jim Bob McGee is still voting for Trump.  Feminists are still voting for Hillary.  I'm still voting for Jim Harbaugh.

#jimharbaughforpresident




Comments

Popular posts from this blog

5 Reasons I Want my Wife to Start Wearing a Head Covering during Corporate Worship

    Of late, the issue of head coverings has come up in my circle.  Okay...my cousin and I have been discussing it, but the point is, the issue has been bouncing around my head for the past few days.  It is a topic that I have avoided for some time.  Every time I read through 1 Corinthians, I would tell myself, "We'll get around to that."  The reality is that I didn't want to be "that guy"...that guy who people view as a chauvinistic jerk who wants to make sure everyone--especially his wife--remembers that he's the head of his home.  I think I'm beginning to respect "that guy"--those men who have cared enough to stand for what they believe.     Let me be clear that I am referring to head coverings for women (those old enough to leave them on...)  DURING CORPORATE WORSHIP.  I am not advocating head coverings at all times.  Though I see nothing necessarily wrong that practice, I don't see any command for it either.   ...

Halftime Shows, Kid Rock, & Celebrity Conversions

Conversions are often for the sake of expedience.  Android users adopt Apple products.  Energy drink drinkers start drinking coffee.  Fair-weather fans join the bandwagon for whatever team seems to be building a dynasty.  People are always changing their allegiances when it is convenient to do so. Religious conversions are no exception.  Such a conversion is often costly, as Christians in places like Nigeria and Pakistan can attest, but it is just as often done for power, money, or respectability.  Christianity, especially the quaint, neo-conservative kind that opposes Commies, supports Israel, and produces alternative entertainment content, is kind of in right now, so it's fair to question celebrity conversions at this particular moment in American history. Much has been made of the fact that Kid Rock headlined a conservative, religious alternative to Bad Bunny's halftime show.  If you don't know, Kid Rock hasn't exactly spent his career creating fa...

Paedocommunion: Consistent Covenantalism or Anti-Confessionalism?

    Being raised as a paedocommunionist (that means our kids get to eat Jesus, too), I have always been amazed by how passionately credocommunionists (that means their kids don't get to eat Jesus until they articulate a "credible" profession of faith) dislike the practice.  I would think that they could look at paedocommunion and at least respect it as an attempt to live out Covenant Theology in a consistent way.  Instead, paedocommunionists have been widely viewed as being on the fringe of the fringe (yes, that far) of Reformed Theology.  I like to think that I have been able to agree-to-disagree in an amicable way with my credocommunionist friends.  However, I will admit that being discounted as "unconfessional" (trust me, I've been called worse) has made many paedocommunionists (you'd have to ask my friends whether or not that applies to me) act in a manner that lacks Christian grace.     So, the question remains, is paedocommunion a view hel...