Skip to main content

Jeremiah 13:8-11

"Then the word of Yahweh came to me: “Thus says Yahweh: Even so will I spoil the pride of Judah and the great pride of Jerusalem. This evil people, who refuse to hear my words, who stubbornly follow their own heart and have gone after other gods to serve them and worship them, shall be like this loincloth, which is good for nothing. For as the loincloth clings to the waist of a man, so I made the whole house of Israel and the whole house of Judah cling to me, declares Yahweh, that they might be for me a people, a name, a praise, and a glory, but they would not listen."

    The first seven verses of this chapter relate the story of how Yahweh tells Jeremiah to buy a loincloth and wear it and then bury it in a hillside.  Jeremiah is then instructed to retrieve it and, as expected, it is ruined.  It's good for nothing.  This is yet another picture that Yahweh gives to demonstrate the filth and putrition of Israel/Judah, and what was about to happen to them. 

    I think too often we try to nail down the eschatological meaning and significance of passages such as this and we forget to apply it to our own lives.  What does the loincloth picture and how does it apply to us?  Here's a few of my thoughts. 

    Yahweh chose a loincloth to demonstrate the intimacy that He had sovereignly granted to the nation of Israel (which later became the two nations of Judah and Israel).  They had been given the rare opportunity of dwelling in the very visible presence of the Creator of the Universe.  As intimate as a husband is to his, so Israel was to God.  Isreal scorned this privilege and regarded it as worthless.  They despised it.  They trampled it under their feet.  As spoiled children they couldn't comprehend the priceless worth of their status and they rebelled against their Father.

    Here's the thing.  We have been given an even greater privilege.  We can approach the throne of Yahweh through Christ.  Indeed, we are invited to.  Instead, we prefer our sin.  We prefer the television.  We prefer the bosom of evil to the intimate communion of our Father and His Son, our Husband, Jesus Christ.  Like Isreal, we whore ourselves out to our transgressions.  We fail to understand the worth of the position we have been given in the family of Yahweh, the Creator God.  We are sons and heirs--fellow-heirs with the perfect God/Man, Jesus Christ.  We are the bride and He is our bridegroom, and yet, we choose to revel in our iniquities, presuming upon the mercy of God. 

    We need to stop.  We need to repent.  We need to enjoy the intimacy and fellowship with God, remembering that light has no fellowship with darkness.  It can't.  It won't.  1 John 1 makes that clear.

    

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

4 Reasons I Affirm Paedocommunion

If you have interacted with me on social media, you know that I have always been outspoken on the issue of Paedocommunion .  It is a theological position and a liturgical practice about which I am passionate.  Having been raised, and having raised my children, at the Table, I cannot imagine attending a church that didn't allow PC.  I hope that when I am old and gray, I will still be an advocate for bringing little children to the Sacrament. Throughout the 12 years that I have had this blog, I have written scattered thoughts on the topic, but it appears that I have never written a concise summary of my reasons for affirming PC.  I was thoroughly convinced that I had, but I can't seem to locate it, so I guess I never did.  So, to rectify the omission, here are four reasons I hold to PC. 1) Paedocommunion is Biblical.   Any discussion of the topic should start here, and I would hope that both sides of the debate would make this assertion.  However, l...

1 Corinthians, the Covenant Hermeneutic, & Paedocommunion

As an adherent to Paedocommunion  (hereafter PC), I have always found it painfully ironic that Credocommunionists use 1 Corinthians 11 to withhold children (among others) from the Table.  One can imagine St. Paul shaking his head as he watches theologians using his discussion of unity at the Table to divide the body at the Table.  You're missing the point! he would say in exasperation.  Not only does 1 Corinthians 11 not forbid PC; I would go so far as to say that there is no better defense of PC in the New Testament than the epistle of 1 Corinthians. Credocommunionist logic is pretty straightforward.  1 Corinthians 11:28 says, "Let a person examine himself, then, and so eat of the bread and drink of the cup."  If, they argue, one is unable to fulfill the exhortation to examine himself, then he may not eat of the bread and drink of the cup.  This is a pretty logical deduction, right? Credobaptists would adamantly agree.  Acts 2:38 says, "Repe...

The Real Presence & Paedocommunion: A Deeper Rift Between Reformed Churches

You're going back to Rome! Theological disagreements within the Reformed world, especially those of the last half century, often devolve into these sorts of accusations.  As controversialists like Doug Wilson and Peter Leithart began to break away from the larger conservative Presbyterian and Reformed denominations, it became clear that the rift was deeper than semantics and systematic minutiae.  Much like the Reformation four centuries before, the Table was a primary point of conflict.   What does it mean?  Who may partake?  What do we call it?    These questions, along with a few more, divided Reformed brethren as the physical elements of our religion reflected deeper conflicts.  Good men began to understand that the problem wasn't just in our logos, but in our pathos and ethos, as well. Paedocommunion (hereafter PC) has been one of the hottest points of contention.  PC has always been normal to me as I grew up with it.  I underst...