Skip to main content

Psalm 2. The Dominion of Christ

Why do the nations rage
and the peoples plot in vain?
The kings of the earth set themselves,
and the rulers take counsel together,
against the Lord and against his Anointed, saying,
“Let us burst their bonds apart
and cast away their cords from us.”
He who sits in the heavens laughs;
the Lord holds them in derision.
Then he will speak to them in his wrath,
and terrify them in his fury, saying,
“As for me, I have set my King
on Zion, my holy hill.”
I will tell of the decree:
The Lord said to me, “You are my Son;
today I have begotten you.
Ask of me, and I will make the nations your heritage,
and the ends of the earth your possession.
You shall break them with a rod of iron
and dash them in pieces like a potter’s vessel.”
 Now therefore, O kings, be wise;
be warned, O rulers of the earth.
Serve the Lord with fear,
and rejoice with trembling.
Kiss the Son,
lest he be angry, and you perish in the way,
for his wrath is quickly kindled.
Blessed are all who take refuge in him.

    I am currently reading through the Major Prophets in my own personal Bible reading time.  I'm almost to the end of Jeremiah, and it has been striking me how God is communication oracles against nations--the Philistines, Ammon, Babylon, Moab, and a few others.  In some cases they are being punished because of their treatment of Israel.  The Dispensationalist thinker would like you to believe that is the only reason.  The reality is, throughout the Bible, Yahweh declares punishment on many nations merely because they are unrighteous.  Take, for instance, Genesis 15:16, where God tells Abraham that his offspring will not make it into the land for a few more generations because the iniquity of the Amorites is not yet complete.  Let us not forget that Yahweh was using Israel as a tool of punishment against these evil nations.  

    Why does this matter?  What's my point?  I'm glad you're asking that.  Let's return to Psalm 2.  David asks the heathen nations why they are not obeying God.  Why are they imagining that they can overthrow Yahweh?  The idea that Israel's God was good for Israel and they had a government run by God's Law, but we shouldn't because, after all, we're New Testament Christians and we just bend over and take it because Jesus loves everybody and we should never disrupt peoples'  lives by telling them that Somebody owns them and has a say in what they should do--even in government--that idea, yeah, it's stupid.  The muslims don't believe that, and neither should we.  Our God declares unilateral ownership of our lives, and that includes education, entertainment, and civil government. 

    We have here in Psalms a Messianic Psalm.  What does that mean, Johnny?  Well, that means that this Psalm is actually a prophecy of Jesus Christ.  Jesus is God's Anointed.  Did you know that Messiah and Christ are the same word in different languages?  Did you also know that they both mean "Anointed"?  I think the translation of Christ (or transliteration, I should say) has hurt our concept of who Christ is.  Christ is the Anointed One, and as such, fulfills three Old Testament types who received anointings--prophet, priest, and most specifically, king.  So, the Jews will say that this is only talking about David.  Well, it may be in an immediate sense of the passage, but we know that often in the Old Testament types have greater prophetic antitypes, and that's usually Jesus. 

    Let's tie in another theme from the Bible.  You know all those prophecies in the Old Testament that David would have a son abiding on the throne of Israel forever?  If you read the Old Testament, you can miss them.  It was a promise given to David at his time of calling (see 2 Samuel 7:12-16).  The promise was claimed by Solomon in 1 Kings 8:25.  It is confirmed in Jeremiah 33:21.  It is repeatedly mentioned in the book of Ezekiel.  It's all over the Old Testament.  It's a theme.  Anyway, Psalm 2 shows us that Yahweh's promise to David was fulfilled.  The Dispensationalist thinker (sorry to pick on you guys) wants to see this fulfilled literally.  Many have developed some pretty strange views based on trying to see this fulfilled literally (British Israelism, for instance).  We need to get over our obsession with Israel.  I know, I know.  God seems pretty obsessed with Israel in the Bible.  But we miss the point when we insist on this woodenly literal hermeneutic.  What does Paul say?  There is not seeds, but one seed--Jesus Christ.  Jesus Christ is the fulfillment of God's covenant with Abraham (Romans 4, I think...I might be wrong, and I'm too lazy to check).  Jesus Christ is the fulfillment of the "seed of the woman" covenant (threat) made with Satan in Genesis 3.  Jesus is the fulfillment of the ceremonial system in the Old Testament, and ultimately, He is the true Israel (Jacob, the apple of God's eye), and the true David.  

    You see, the Dispensationalist insists that God's promises to Israel will be literally fulfilled, by which they mean physically for the race of people known as Jews.  What they miss is that God's promises have been fulfilled in the reality of what Israel was all about--Jesus.  For Ezekiel 34:24 to be fulfilled, David himself would have to come to earth and reign in Jerusalem.  It says, "David" plain and clear.  What about "David"  don't you understand?  Wait, maybe "David" is a symbol of Jesus.  Why have I taken this rabbit trail?  To say this.  "And Jesus came and said, All authority in heaven and on earth has been given unto me."  This is a fulfillment of Psalm 2.  This is a fulfillment of all those prophecies about David's heirs reigning, and about David himself reigning.  Jesus is the king of the Universe.  Yahweh says so.  So our government should acknowledge Him as such.  Jesus doesn't care if you don't believe in Him--He still is reigning.  We, as the Church, need to proclaim Jesus' rightful authority over our government, and all the governments (whether family, church, or civil) in the world.  Now, therefore, kings, be wise.  This is your warning, rulers of the earth.  Serve Jesus Christ with fear and trembling.  Kiss the Son.  Bow down to Him, or suffer the fate of Moab, and Babylon, and all the other nations that perished for idolatry.  

    God doesn't believe in the secular/religious distintion.  Neither do I.  All of life, even goverments, owe allegiance to the Creator and His Anointed One, Jesus Christ.  Bow to Him.  Obey His Laws.  Then and only then will we find true peace and happiness. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

4 Reasons I Affirm Paedocommunion

If you have interacted with me on social media, you know that I have always been outspoken on the issue of Paedocommunion .  It is a theological position and a liturgical practice about which I am passionate.  Having been raised, and having raised my children, at the Table, I cannot imagine attending a church that didn't allow PC.  I hope that when I am old and gray, I will still be an advocate for bringing little children to the Sacrament. Throughout the 12 years that I have had this blog, I have written scattered thoughts on the topic, but it appears that I have never written a concise summary of my reasons for affirming PC.  I was thoroughly convinced that I had, but I can't seem to locate it, so I guess I never did.  So, to rectify the omission, here are four reasons I hold to PC. 1) Paedocommunion is Biblical.   Any discussion of the topic should start here, and I would hope that both sides of the debate would make this assertion.  However, l...

1 Corinthians, the Covenant Hermeneutic, & Paedocommunion

As an adherent to Paedocommunion  (hereafter PC), I have always found it painfully ironic that Credocommunionists use 1 Corinthians 11 to withhold children (among others) from the Table.  One can imagine St. Paul shaking his head as he watches theologians using his discussion of unity at the Table to divide the body at the Table.  You're missing the point! he would say in exasperation.  Not only does 1 Corinthians 11 not forbid PC; I would go so far as to say that there is no better defense of PC in the New Testament than the epistle of 1 Corinthians. Credocommunionist logic is pretty straightforward.  1 Corinthians 11:28 says, "Let a person examine himself, then, and so eat of the bread and drink of the cup."  If, they argue, one is unable to fulfill the exhortation to examine himself, then he may not eat of the bread and drink of the cup.  This is a pretty logical deduction, right? Credobaptists would adamantly agree.  Acts 2:38 says, "Repe...

The Real Presence & Paedocommunion: A Deeper Rift Between Reformed Churches

You're going back to Rome! Theological disagreements within the Reformed world, especially those of the last half century, often devolve into these sorts of accusations.  As controversialists like Doug Wilson and Peter Leithart began to break away from the larger conservative Presbyterian and Reformed denominations, it became clear that the rift was deeper than semantics and systematic minutiae.  Much like the Reformation four centuries before, the Table was a primary point of conflict.   What does it mean?  Who may partake?  What do we call it?    These questions, along with a few more, divided Reformed brethren as the physical elements of our religion reflected deeper conflicts.  Good men began to understand that the problem wasn't just in our logos, but in our pathos and ethos, as well. Paedocommunion (hereafter PC) has been one of the hottest points of contention.  PC has always been normal to me as I grew up with it.  I underst...