Skip to main content

Education, Disney, & Parental Choice

Education is important.  Education is vital.  Education is paramount.

This has been the universal opinion of tyrants, religionists, economists, and zealots of all persuasions.  In fact, the importance of education is one of the few things upon which virtually all philosophies can agree.  The intentional and systematic training of our children is obviously a good thing.  What could be more important than the formation of the minds of our young?  What is more powerful than the opportunity to shape the worldview of those who will one day lead our nation?  What is more lasting, more enduring, than determining the content and perspective of the education of those who will one day bury you?

You may be surprised to hear me say, then, that my favorite hashtag is #abolishgovernmentschools.  You see, too many people (most of whom attended government schools) believe that opposition to government involvement in an activity is equivalent to opposition to that activity itself.  Nothing could be further from the truth.  Having been raised the son of an educator, there is little I value more than education, but I don't want my kids anywhere near a school run by any government currently in existence in my town, state, or country.

The recent controversy regarding Florida's parental rights bill, including Disney's involvement, illustrates the fundamental divide in our nation.  As much as I appreciate what DeSantis is attempting to do, I can't help but to think that he's slapping a band-aid on a wound that obviously requires amputation, and I think many people are awaking to this reality--this nation is fundamentally divided.  The issues we debate, sex education in this instance, are symptoms of much greater moral and philosophical disparities.  

This fact begs some follow-up questions.  Why would you want your children to be taught by (in many cases, essentially raised by) a system that is fundamentally at odds with your worldview?  Why would you want the minds of your children to be shaped by those with whom you differ regarding the meaning of life?  Why would you place your offspring under the influence of those whose agenda you fear?

I proffer these questions to parents of all backgrounds, conservative and liberal, Christian and atheist, Woke and old-fashioned.  Does it really make sense to let our ideological opponents teach our kids how to view life?  Does a unified education system seem like a viable option at this point in a country with such fundamental rifts?

Education is not neutral.  Nothing is.  Neutrality is the greatest myth ever told.  Folks like to talk about Disney's agenda or Christians' agenda or CNN's agenda or FOX's agenda, all while denying their own agendas, but let's be clear about one thing--we all have an agenda.  

Let me say that again for the folks in the back: WE ALL HAVE AN AGENDA!

Some people hide their agendas.  Some people don't.  Some people are not even aware that they have one, but they certainly do.  Any educator, entertainer, or evangelist worth his salt has an agenda, and he ought to be aware of and honest about it.

The answer, then, can never be to eliminate agendas from education.  That is neither possible nor desirable.  The answer is abolition.  

Abolish government schools.

This conflagration between DeSantis and Disney has revealed an insuperable ideological rift in our nation.  It is painfully obvious that no single education system can adequately represent those who are so diametrically opposed.  So, let's break up.  You teach your kids and I'll teach mine.  Let's all keep our money and use it to train our children the way that we see fit.  Our system is badly ineffective and inefficient as it is (free is a misnomer, of course), and those of us who spurn our local schools are being forced to pay twice.  Naturally, there are questions of providing education for the less-fortunate and single-parent households, but these are questions much better answered by the free market and private philanthropy than by Uncle Sam.

So, it's time.  Let's do it.  Privatize our education system.  Sell the buildings to the teachers' unions and see if they can keep them afloat in the real world, one where competition exists.  Let them compete against churches, private individuals, homeschool co-ops, and private enterprises and see if anybody still wants to utilize them.

#abolishgovernmentschools

Comments

  1. Very well said. I actually think that much of our nation is really 70% on the side of DeSantis. We just have to wait for the house built on sand to crumble.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Agreed. I think we definitely have a silent majority and a really, really loud minority in this country.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

4 Reasons I Affirm Paedocommunion

If you have interacted with me on social media, you know that I have always been outspoken on the issue of Paedocommunion .  It is a theological position and a liturgical practice about which I am passionate.  Having been raised, and having raised my children, at the Table, I cannot imagine attending a church that didn't allow PC.  I hope that when I am old and gray, I will still be an advocate for bringing little children to the Sacrament. Throughout the 12 years that I have had this blog, I have written scattered thoughts on the topic, but it appears that I have never written a concise summary of my reasons for affirming PC.  I was thoroughly convinced that I had, but I can't seem to locate it, so I guess I never did.  So, to rectify the omission, here are four reasons I hold to PC. 1) Paedocommunion is Biblical.   Any discussion of the topic should start here, and I would hope that both sides of the debate would make this assertion.  However, let me clarify what I mean when

1 Corinthians, the Covenant Hermeneutic, & Paedocommunion

As an adherent to Paedocommunion  (hereafter PC), I have always found it painfully ironic that Credocommunionists use 1 Corinthians 11 to withhold children (among others) from the Table.  One can imagine St. Paul shaking his head as he watches theologians using his discussion of unity at the Table to divide the body at the Table.  You're missing the point! he would say in exasperation.  Not only does 1 Corinthians 11 not forbid PC; I would go so far as to say that there is no better defense of PC in the New Testament than the epistle of 1 Corinthians. Credocommunionist logic is pretty straightforward.  1 Corinthians 11:28 says, "Let a person examine himself, then, and so eat of the bread and drink of the cup."  If, they argue, one is unable to fulfill the exhortation to examine himself, then he may not eat of the bread and drink of the cup.  This is a pretty logical deduction, right? Credobaptists would adamantly agree.  Acts 2:38 says, "Repent and be baptized...&quo

Why do you go to church on Sunday?

Why do you go to church on Sunday?  I would assume there are many reasons, but what is the primary reason that you get up on a cold, snowy Sunday morning and get your butt to church?  Further, why has the Church of Jesus Christ consistently gathered together on Sundays (among other days) for the last 2000 years? Throughout my 34 years of church attendance I would have proffered a variety of answers to that question.  As a child I'm sure I went to church because I had to, to see my cousins (who happened to be my best friends), to get bread and wine (weekly communion for the win), etc.  As my faith matured in adulthood these reasons remained, hopefully deepening, but to them were added concepts like rest and theological training. As I moved into Anglicanism I was struck by the deliberate focus on worship .  Why do Christians gather on Sunday morning?  To worship God!  Are teaching and fellowship important?  Absolutely!  Are they aspects of worship?  Certainly!  Is either the primary