Skip to main content

The Benedict Option: A Book Review

In today's world it is altogether too easy to become alarmist or escapist.  In fact, it is difficult not to overreact when surveying a culture that is nihilistic, post-Christian, politically divided, and which increasingly embraces (one could say assumes) government intervention in the lives of private citizens.  Rod Dreher, however, presents a case and strategy for living calmly and strategically as we watch Western Civilization crumble around us.  Without mitigating the seriousness of our situation, Dreher advises Christians to live faithfully, boldly, and separately, without becoming cultish or tribal.  The Church, after all, will be here long after Western Civilization falls, and we are called to be the salt and light of the world.

 The Benedict Option begins by acquainting the reader with St. Benedict of Norcia, the founder of the Benedictine Order of monks and the author of the monastic Rule that now bears his name.  Dreher compares our day to Benedict's, emphasizing several points of similarity.  Benedict's primary contribution to the Church, and to Western Civilization in general, is forming centers of Christian and cultural retention as the Western world was beginning to lose the stabilizing effects of the Roman Empire.

Dreher continues by drawing out principles from Benedict's Rule that remain pertinent in our own day.  The Benedictine practices of prayer, fasting, and labor, to name a few, are as important and fundamental today as they were when Benedict was establishing monasteries across Europe.  Dreher shows how these same ideas can be pulled from the monastery and applied in local communities of committed Christians in our own day.

This book is impactful and important for several reasons.  Firstly, Dreher pulls no punches, acknowledging the dire status of our culture, not merely in the United States, but throughout what is traditionally termed Western Civilization.  He proffers statistics and cites studies that demonstrate the precarious position in which we find ourselves.  He calls much-needed attention to issues, but he does so constructively, an approach that is much too rare in modern religious and political discussions. 

Secondly, Dreher demonstrates why we're in this position.  The second chapter basically outlines 1000 years of philosophy and explains how different movements have brought us to this moment in history.  Understanding history is absolutely crucial in order to face the future with hope and sobriety.  Dreher embraces heritage and tradition, both of the Church and Western Civilization (despite being Eastern Orthodox), without drifting into idyllic fantasies of bygone eras.  His goal is not that we would return to a former age of the Church, but that we would apply ancient principles to our modern context. 

Thirdly, Dreher reminds Christians that we need to stick together.  He comes from a Roman Catholic background and converted to Eastern Orthodoxy (big O) a few years ago, but he is respectful to all orthodox (small o) traditions and advocates forming communities and ministries outside of denominational lines.  The key here is orthodoxy, which mainline denominations in the West have slowly abandoned over the last century.  Our culture no longer believes in objective truth, so anyone can claim to be whatever they want.  In a world where men can have babies and women can grow beards, it makes perfect sense that someone can claim to be a Christian without confessing the truths or following the moral standards of traditional Christianity.  Those of us who remain committed to the Nicene Creed and the moral standards of the Bible need to put aside other differences and work together.  

Fourthly and finally, Dreher thinks holistically.  Chapter after chapter deals with real, pertinent issues, from pornography to vocation to worship.  He rightly teaches that our faith, if it is to be genuine and survive the coming storm, must be ingrained into every aspect of our lives.  Our culture is pervasively corrupt, and so our response must be pervasively Christian.  The way that we entertain ourselves, educate our children, choose where to live and which career path to follow, etc., must be informed and guided by our religion.  As societal norms complete the transformation from Christian to secular to anti-Christian, nominal Christianity will largely disappear, and only those truly committed to following the way of Jesus Christ will continue to claim His name.

This book is challenging, compelling, and enjoyable.  I recommend it to anyone, whether you're a Bible-believing Baptist or a baby-baptizing Byzantine Catholic.  The bottom line is this: read this book!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

4 Reasons I Affirm Paedocommunion

If you have interacted with me on social media, you know that I have always been outspoken on the issue of Paedocommunion .  It is a theological position and a liturgical practice about which I am passionate.  Having been raised, and having raised my children, at the Table, I cannot imagine attending a church that didn't allow PC.  I hope that when I am old and gray, I will still be an advocate for bringing little children to the Sacrament. Throughout the 12 years that I have had this blog, I have written scattered thoughts on the topic, but it appears that I have never written a concise summary of my reasons for affirming PC.  I was thoroughly convinced that I had, but I can't seem to locate it, so I guess I never did.  So, to rectify the omission, here are four reasons I hold to PC. 1) Paedocommunion is Biblical.   Any discussion of the topic should start here, and I would hope that both sides of the debate would make this assertion.  However, let me clarify what I mean when

1 Corinthians, the Covenant Hermeneutic, & Paedocommunion

As an adherent to Paedocommunion  (hereafter PC), I have always found it painfully ironic that Credocommunionists use 1 Corinthians 11 to withhold children (among others) from the Table.  One can imagine St. Paul shaking his head as he watches theologians using his discussion of unity at the Table to divide the body at the Table.  You're missing the point! he would say in exasperation.  Not only does 1 Corinthians 11 not forbid PC; I would go so far as to say that there is no better defense of PC in the New Testament than the epistle of 1 Corinthians. Credocommunionist logic is pretty straightforward.  1 Corinthians 11:28 says, "Let a person examine himself, then, and so eat of the bread and drink of the cup."  If, they argue, one is unable to fulfill the exhortation to examine himself, then he may not eat of the bread and drink of the cup.  This is a pretty logical deduction, right? Credobaptists would adamantly agree.  Acts 2:38 says, "Repent and be baptized...&quo

Why do you go to church on Sunday?

Why do you go to church on Sunday?  I would assume there are many reasons, but what is the primary reason that you get up on a cold, snowy Sunday morning and get your butt to church?  Further, why has the Church of Jesus Christ consistently gathered together on Sundays (among other days) for the last 2000 years? Throughout my 34 years of church attendance I would have proffered a variety of answers to that question.  As a child I'm sure I went to church because I had to, to see my cousins (who happened to be my best friends), to get bread and wine (weekly communion for the win), etc.  As my faith matured in adulthood these reasons remained, hopefully deepening, but to them were added concepts like rest and theological training. As I moved into Anglicanism I was struck by the deliberate focus on worship .  Why do Christians gather on Sunday morning?  To worship God!  Are teaching and fellowship important?  Absolutely!  Are they aspects of worship?  Certainly!  Is either the primary