Skip to main content

Should Everyone Vote?

Get out and vote!  

Voting is your civic duty!

Your voice matters!

Does it?  

Does every voice matter?  

Does every citizen of the United States who has arrived at the age of majority really have a valid opinion on matters of state?

Maybe universal suffrage is a bad idea.

The media is telling you that you need to vote.  Anytime the media is saying it, you probably have reason to doubt it.

LeBron James and the rest of the NBA are telling you that you need to vote.  I guess being an athlete qualifies you to say such things.

Facebook and Instagram are begging you to go out and get registered to vote.  There's no way they have an agenda!

I've been rethinking democracy lately.  Maybe this whole "everyone has a voice" thing is a bad idea.  Maybe there's a reason that the United States is not, properly speaking, a Democracy.  Maybe our founding fathers created a Constitutional Republic to avoid the pitfalls of naked democracy.

If you have no idea what the difference is between those two, maybe you shouldn't vote.

I will never understand the push to get people registered to vote right before an election.  If a person was not registered to vote up to this point, he or she is probably not informed enough to vote. 

Or maybe that's the whole point.  Maybe they know that ignorant, otherwise-complacent citizens will vote for whichever candidate promises them the most stuff.  Maybe they know that their recruits will go into the voting booth and pick whichever candidate has a D by their name, policies and issues be damned.

Maybe there is no viable balance between the stability of a monarchy and the freedom of anarchy.

If you don't have a fundamental understanding of civics or economics, please don't vote.  

If you have chosen not to educate yourself on any of the issues facing the nation at this time, please don't vote.

If you didn't even know that you had to be registered to vote until ESPN told you, please don't vote.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

4 Reasons I Affirm Paedocommunion

If you have interacted with me on social media, you know that I have always been outspoken on the issue of Paedocommunion .  It is a theological position and a liturgical practice about which I am passionate.  Having been raised, and having raised my children, at the Table, I cannot imagine attending a church that didn't allow PC.  I hope that when I am old and gray, I will still be an advocate for bringing little children to the Sacrament. Throughout the 12 years that I have had this blog, I have written scattered thoughts on the topic, but it appears that I have never written a concise summary of my reasons for affirming PC.  I was thoroughly convinced that I had, but I can't seem to locate it, so I guess I never did.  So, to rectify the omission, here are four reasons I hold to PC. 1) Paedocommunion is Biblical.   Any discussion of the topic should start here, and I would hope that both sides of the debate would make this assertion.  However, l...

The Real Presence & Paedocommunion: A Deeper Rift Between Reformed Churches

You're going back to Rome! Theological disagreements within the Reformed world, especially those of the last half century, often devolve into these sorts of accusations.  As controversialists like Doug Wilson and Peter Leithart began to break away from the larger conservative Presbyterian and Reformed denominations, it became clear that the rift was deeper than semantics and systematic minutiae.  Much like the Reformation four centuries before, the Table was a primary point of conflict.   What does it mean?  Who may partake?  What do we call it?    These questions, along with a few more, divided Reformed brethren as the physical elements of our religion reflected deeper conflicts.  Good men began to understand that the problem wasn't just in our logos, but in our pathos and ethos, as well. Paedocommunion (hereafter PC) has been one of the hottest points of contention.  PC has always been normal to me as I grew up with it.  I underst...

Anglicanism, Paedocommunion, & Being Reformed

I consider myself Reformed.  I was baptized as a baby in a PCA church.  I grew up in a Reformed microdenomination that allowed its member churches to subscribe to any of the Reformed confessions (we subscribed to the Three Forms of Unity).  In many ways, whether I like it or not, I still think and act like a Reformed Presbyterian.   Some, however, would seek to deny me that label.  I suspect there are many reasons for this, but paramount among them is that I hold to Paedocommunion (hereafter PC), which, for some reason, is absolutely the worst thing ever to these people.  Some would go so far as to say that PC makes me a heretic, but they all agree that I am certainly not Reformed .   My recent engagement with these opponents of PC has caused me to reflect on what it means to be Reformed and what it means to be a Christian.  This online jousting has dovetailed well with some of my recent study, particularly  An Apology of the Church...