Skip to main content

Should Everyone Vote?

Get out and vote!  

Voting is your civic duty!

Your voice matters!

Does it?  

Does every voice matter?  

Does every citizen of the United States who has arrived at the age of majority really have a valid opinion on matters of state?

Maybe universal suffrage is a bad idea.

The media is telling you that you need to vote.  Anytime the media is saying it, you probably have reason to doubt it.

LeBron James and the rest of the NBA are telling you that you need to vote.  I guess being an athlete qualifies you to say such things.

Facebook and Instagram are begging you to go out and get registered to vote.  There's no way they have an agenda!

I've been rethinking democracy lately.  Maybe this whole "everyone has a voice" thing is a bad idea.  Maybe there's a reason that the United States is not, properly speaking, a Democracy.  Maybe our founding fathers created a Constitutional Republic to avoid the pitfalls of naked democracy.

If you have no idea what the difference is between those two, maybe you shouldn't vote.

I will never understand the push to get people registered to vote right before an election.  If a person was not registered to vote up to this point, he or she is probably not informed enough to vote. 

Or maybe that's the whole point.  Maybe they know that ignorant, otherwise-complacent citizens will vote for whichever candidate promises them the most stuff.  Maybe they know that their recruits will go into the voting booth and pick whichever candidate has a D by their name, policies and issues be damned.

Maybe there is no viable balance between the stability of a monarchy and the freedom of anarchy.

If you don't have a fundamental understanding of civics or economics, please don't vote.  

If you have chosen not to educate yourself on any of the issues facing the nation at this time, please don't vote.

If you didn't even know that you had to be registered to vote until ESPN told you, please don't vote.

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

4 Reasons I Affirm Paedocommunion

If you have interacted with me on social media, you know that I have always been outspoken on the issue of Paedocommunion .  It is a theological position and a liturgical practice about which I am passionate.  Having been raised, and having raised my children, at the Table, I cannot imagine attending a church that didn't allow PC.  I hope that when I am old and gray, I will still be an advocate for bringing little children to the Sacrament. Throughout the 12 years that I have had this blog, I have written scattered thoughts on the topic, but it appears that I have never written a concise summary of my reasons for affirming PC.  I was thoroughly convinced that I had, but I can't seem to locate it, so I guess I never did.  So, to rectify the omission, here are four reasons I hold to PC. 1) Paedocommunion is Biblical.   Any discussion of the topic should start here, and I would hope that both sides of the debate would make this assertion.  However, l...
Post a Comment
Read more

1 Corinthians, the Covenant Hermeneutic, & Paedocommunion

As an adherent to Paedocommunion  (hereafter PC), I have always found it painfully ironic that Credocommunionists use 1 Corinthians 11 to withhold children (among others) from the Table.  One can imagine St. Paul shaking his head as he watches theologians using his discussion of unity at the Table to divide the body at the Table.  You're missing the point! he would say in exasperation.  Not only does 1 Corinthians 11 not forbid PC; I would go so far as to say that there is no better defense of PC in the New Testament than the epistle of 1 Corinthians. Credocommunionist logic is pretty straightforward.  1 Corinthians 11:28 says, "Let a person examine himself, then, and so eat of the bread and drink of the cup."  If, they argue, one is unable to fulfill the exhortation to examine himself, then he may not eat of the bread and drink of the cup.  This is a pretty logical deduction, right? Credobaptists would adamantly agree.  Acts 2:38 says, "Repe...
Post a Comment
Read more

The Real Presence & Paedocommunion: A Deeper Rift Between Reformed Churches

You're going back to Rome! Theological disagreements within the Reformed world, especially those of the last half century, often devolve into these sorts of accusations.  As controversialists like Doug Wilson and Peter Leithart began to break away from the larger conservative Presbyterian and Reformed denominations, it became clear that the rift was deeper than semantics and systematic minutiae.  Much like the Reformation four centuries before, the Table was a primary point of conflict.   What does it mean?  Who may partake?  What do we call it?    These questions, along with a few more, divided Reformed brethren as the physical elements of our religion reflected deeper conflicts.  Good men began to understand that the problem wasn't just in our logos, but in our pathos and ethos, as well. Paedocommunion (hereafter PC) has been one of the hottest points of contention.  PC has always been normal to me as I grew up with it.  I underst...
Post a Comment
Read more