Skip to main content

The Existence & Attributes of God: A Review

Finishing a long book can be so bittersweet.  If you're like me, you feel accomplished and edified, but you also feel a little sad.  If it was a good book, you may have grown accustomed to the sight and smell of its pages, and closing it for the final time feels like saying goodbye to an old friend.  This is particularly true when the book is as powerful as Stephen Charnock's classic work, The Existence & Attributes of God.  Today I am going to tell you why you, and every Christian, should read this book.

I remember being a young boy and seeing this book sitting on my father's bookshelf.  It seemed so daunting, so out of reach.  I wasn't much of a reader until I reached my 20s, so a book of 1130 pages seemed unattainable, especially a book of such depth and archaic language.  When my father recently discovered that he had an extra, unopened copy, I was quick to claim it.  I started working my way through it sometime last year.  I typically read at least two books at a time, so it can take me a year or more to read a book of this length, but it was a year well-spent.

Charnock's Attributes belies the common caricature of Puritan writings.  Sure, it is sometimes tedious and occasionally verbose, but this is typical of the Puritans, who strove for accuracy and thoroughness, both of which are vital when speaking about the nature of God.  Sure, it is replete with technical, theological discussions, but this does not keep Charnock from practical application, which should be the ultimate goal of all theological study.  Sure, some sections are more difficult to read than others, but, far from being dry or boring, Charnock's prose is poetic and celebrates the glory of our Creator and Redeemer.

So, here are three reasons why every Christian should read this book:

1) Charnock focuses his reader on God first, and man second.  So much of modern theology is really anthropology--it talks more about man than God.  Modern theological literature is dominated by self-help and inspirational works.  Many sermons are moral TED talks that tell us how valuable we are and what God can do for our lives.  In contrast to this pervasive anthro-centrism, we need to read more about God and less about ourselves.  In the Attributes practical application comes only after a thorough evaluation of the nature and works of God.  The reader is humbled and amazed and then told what his response should be as a result of who God is and what He has done.  This is, of course, the pattern found in the majority of the New Testament Epistles.

2) Charnock faithfully presents the God of the Bible.  Since the Fall mankind has been creating gods in his own image.  Unfortunately, this tendency is common in the modern Church and modern theological writings.  Instead of accepting, or simply rejecting, the God described in the Bible, we force God to conform to modern sensibilities, to modern notions of what a deity should be.  Charnock acquaints his readers with the God revealed in the Old and New Testaments, and then calls us to repent, believe, and worship.   

3) Charnock will expand your vocabulary and comprehension.  Many people are apprehensive about reading archaic language because they think they won't "get anything out of it."  The truth is quite the opposite, however.  Reading the Attributes will not only expand your soul, but also your mind and vocabulary.  It will teach you to think logically and methodically, and you may pick up a big word along the way.  I am not ashamed to admit that I read this work with my phone in hand, ready to look up unfamiliar words.  In a culture enslaved to TV and video games, we need to read literature that will challenge and expand our minds.

What I have said about this book holds true for many of the Puritans' writings.  If you don't read the Attributes, I would encourage you to seek out other classic works from the 16th and 17th centuries.  Our inability to read such literature is reflects more upon us than it does the Puritans.  We like to think that everyone was a simple rube before public education became normative, but Charnock was not writing for theologians; he was writing for the common man.  

If you feel like you couldn't possibly survive 1130 pages, I encourage you to read a section or two at a time over the next 10 or 20 years.  Each section reads like a mini book (or a full-sized book, depending a what kind of books you read).  Once you begin to uncover the depth that the Attributes has to offer, you may find it easier reading than you imagined.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Real Presence & Paedocommunion: A Deeper Rift Between Reformed Churches

You're going back to Rome! Theological disagreements within the Reformed world, especially those of the last half century, often devolve into these sorts of accusations.  As controversialists like Doug Wilson and Peter Leithart began to break away from the larger conservative Presbyterian and Reformed denominations, it became clear that the rift was deeper than semantics and systematic minutiae.  Much like the Reformation four centuries before, the Table was a primary point of conflict.   What does it mean?  Who may partake?  What do we call it?    These questions, along with a few more, divided Reformed brethren as the physical elements of our religion reflected deeper conflicts.  Good men began to understand that the problem wasn't just in our logos, but in our pathos and ethos, as well. Paedocommunion (hereafter PC) has been one of the hottest points of contention.  PC has always been normal to me as I grew up with it.  I underst...

Some Thoughts on the 2024 Election

So, we had an election earlier this week.  Perhaps you heard about it. I have done my best to remain mostly silent on political issues this time around because I have found that fixating on such matters does little for my mental or spiritual health.  Also, no one cares what I think.  Nevertheless, here are a few thoughts on our recent election. 1) I didn't vote for Donald Trump, but I'd be lying if I said I'm not glad he won.  To be clear, that says more about Kamala Harris than about Donald Trump. 2) This election seemed much cleaner--much less suspicious--than the sordid affair we had in 2020.  This election didn't feature any poll workers tallying (discovering? conjuring?) votes behind closed doors in the wee hours of the night, messy mail-in voting, or voter turnout beyond plausible expectations.  The 2020 election had me convinced that we would never see another peaceful, uncontested election, but, as contentious as things were this year, it seems like...

Haiku for Bethany

Such a pretty girl The fairest, the loveliest Lovelier each day Kind, caring, friendly Generous, sacrificial Gentle, powerful Her love and her touch Sparks igniting in my chest Souls entwined, yet freed   Golden hair, brown eyes That bright smile that captured My gaze and my heart