Skip to main content

Is emphasizing race really the best way to defeat racism?

Social media is really frustrating right now.  On one side you have racists.  On the other side you have racists.  In the murky middle ground you have racists trying to convince everyone that they're not racists.  Behind it all you have the racists in the media with their inordinate preoccupation with fomenting racial tension.

Racism, historically speaking, was the belief in separate human races as a result of the evolutionary process.  Eventually this developed into the idea that certain races were superior or inferior to others, which, in turn, became a justification for mistreating members of other "races," climaxing in atrocities like the Holocaust.

The Bible, however, rejects the concept of race, instead using terms like tribes, peoples, nations, and tongues (languages) to distinguish between different people groups.  The Biblical answer to the problem of racism, then, is to understand that all mankind is part of the one human race, united by our common ancestors and the image of God.  Science, of course, has long since confirmed that there is only one human race.

Enter 2020.  We're told that racism is the great evil of our day and that we need to stop perpetuating the systemic racism that pervades our land, but then this concept of race continues to dominate the thought processes of those calling for social justice.  Instead of minimizing race, we emphasize it.  We're seeking progress and peace, but we're still operating, at least functionally, upon this incorrect principle that different races exist.  Even as we call for peace between the races, we're missing the point entirely.  We're blind to the fact that the concept of race is inherently flawed.

My question, then, is, "Is emphasizing race really the best way to defeat racism?"

This nation, along with just about every other nation in history of the world, has a history of ethnic discord.  I think every sane person would admit that.  Slavery was evil.  Segregation laws were evil.  The spirit of white supremacy, which lingers yet in some places, is evil.  These evils should be acknowledged and rejected, but is the answer to our racial issues really to continue thinking along the same racial lines?

Is affirmative action, where people receive preferential treatment because of the color of their skin, really the answer to racism?

Are financial reparations for blacks the cure for racism?

Is white guilt really the answer to racism?

Is fixating on race really the answer to racism?

Can the answer to racism really be anything that perpetuates this unbiblical, unscientific concept of race?

I don't know.  Maybe I'm just a white guy who is out of my depth.  Like everyone else I'm just frustrated and searching for answers.

What I do know is that I was taught that all men, women, and children were made in the image of God and deserve respect, regardless of the color of their skin, country of origin, or social class.  I was taught that humans are one people, regardless of the cultural and ethnic distinctions that exist in this world.  I was taught to love my neighbor as myself and to treat all people as I would want to be treated.

That is the Biblical answer to racism.  That is the solution that we really need.

Don't misunderstand me.  I think that there are institutional changes that need to be made.  I am convinced that police violence is an institutional problem that affects all members of our society, blacks included.  Law enforcement policies and perspectives need to be reevaluated and radically altered, but no matter what political or civil changes are made, racism will endure.  Racism is a philosophical and spiritual disease, which means that the cure must ultimately be philosophical and spiritual.

I know that some of you may be thinking that I am simply a white guy unaware of my white privilege.  Black people, you will say, don't have the luxury of forgetting about race.  Well, there is definitely some truth to that, but that doesn't change the fact that any solution to racism that presumes this outdated concept of race will be counterproductive.  Perpetuating this me vs you, black vs white mindset is bound to make racism worse.  We have to find a way to transcend this faulty notion of race if we even hope to see harmony in our land. 

Defining yourself by the color of your skin, which is an inherently-unreliable metric, is not the way to overcome racism.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

4 Reasons I Affirm Paedocommunion

If you have interacted with me on social media, you know that I have always been outspoken on the issue of Paedocommunion .  It is a theological position and a liturgical practice about which I am passionate.  Having been raised, and having raised my children, at the Table, I cannot imagine attending a church that didn't allow PC.  I hope that when I am old and gray, I will still be an advocate for bringing little children to the Sacrament. Throughout the 12 years that I have had this blog, I have written scattered thoughts on the topic, but it appears that I have never written a concise summary of my reasons for affirming PC.  I was thoroughly convinced that I had, but I can't seem to locate it, so I guess I never did.  So, to rectify the omission, here are four reasons I hold to PC. 1) Paedocommunion is Biblical.   Any discussion of the topic should start here, and I would hope that both sides of the debate would make this assertion.  However, l...

1 Corinthians, the Covenant Hermeneutic, & Paedocommunion

As an adherent to Paedocommunion  (hereafter PC), I have always found it painfully ironic that Credocommunionists use 1 Corinthians 11 to withhold children (among others) from the Table.  One can imagine St. Paul shaking his head as he watches theologians using his discussion of unity at the Table to divide the body at the Table.  You're missing the point! he would say in exasperation.  Not only does 1 Corinthians 11 not forbid PC; I would go so far as to say that there is no better defense of PC in the New Testament than the epistle of 1 Corinthians. Credocommunionist logic is pretty straightforward.  1 Corinthians 11:28 says, "Let a person examine himself, then, and so eat of the bread and drink of the cup."  If, they argue, one is unable to fulfill the exhortation to examine himself, then he may not eat of the bread and drink of the cup.  This is a pretty logical deduction, right? Credobaptists would adamantly agree.  Acts 2:38 says, "Repe...

The Real Presence & Paedocommunion: A Deeper Rift Between Reformed Churches

You're going back to Rome! Theological disagreements within the Reformed world, especially those of the last half century, often devolve into these sorts of accusations.  As controversialists like Doug Wilson and Peter Leithart began to break away from the larger conservative Presbyterian and Reformed denominations, it became clear that the rift was deeper than semantics and systematic minutiae.  Much like the Reformation four centuries before, the Table was a primary point of conflict.   What does it mean?  Who may partake?  What do we call it?    These questions, along with a few more, divided Reformed brethren as the physical elements of our religion reflected deeper conflicts.  Good men began to understand that the problem wasn't just in our logos, but in our pathos and ethos, as well. Paedocommunion (hereafter PC) has been one of the hottest points of contention.  PC has always been normal to me as I grew up with it.  I underst...