Skip to main content

Is emphasizing race really the best way to defeat racism?

Social media is really frustrating right now.  On one side you have racists.  On the other side you have racists.  In the murky middle ground you have racists trying to convince everyone that they're not racists.  Behind it all you have the racists in the media with their inordinate preoccupation with fomenting racial tension.

Racism, historically speaking, was the belief in separate human races as a result of the evolutionary process.  Eventually this developed into the idea that certain races were superior or inferior to others, which, in turn, became a justification for mistreating members of other "races," climaxing in atrocities like the Holocaust.

The Bible, however, rejects the concept of race, instead using terms like tribes, peoples, nations, and tongues (languages) to distinguish between different people groups.  The Biblical answer to the problem of racism, then, is to understand that all mankind is part of the one human race, united by our common ancestors and the image of God.  Science, of course, has long since confirmed that there is only one human race.

Enter 2020.  We're told that racism is the great evil of our day and that we need to stop perpetuating the systemic racism that pervades our land, but then this concept of race continues to dominate the thought processes of those calling for social justice.  Instead of minimizing race, we emphasize it.  We're seeking progress and peace, but we're still operating, at least functionally, upon this incorrect principle that different races exist.  Even as we call for peace between the races, we're missing the point entirely.  We're blind to the fact that the concept of race is inherently flawed.

My question, then, is, "Is emphasizing race really the best way to defeat racism?"

This nation, along with just about every other nation in history of the world, has a history of ethnic discord.  I think every sane person would admit that.  Slavery was evil.  Segregation laws were evil.  The spirit of white supremacy, which lingers yet in some places, is evil.  These evils should be acknowledged and rejected, but is the answer to our racial issues really to continue thinking along the same racial lines?

Is affirmative action, where people receive preferential treatment because of the color of their skin, really the answer to racism?

Are financial reparations for blacks the cure for racism?

Is white guilt really the answer to racism?

Is fixating on race really the answer to racism?

Can the answer to racism really be anything that perpetuates this unbiblical, unscientific concept of race?

I don't know.  Maybe I'm just a white guy who is out of my depth.  Like everyone else I'm just frustrated and searching for answers.

What I do know is that I was taught that all men, women, and children were made in the image of God and deserve respect, regardless of the color of their skin, country of origin, or social class.  I was taught that humans are one people, regardless of the cultural and ethnic distinctions that exist in this world.  I was taught to love my neighbor as myself and to treat all people as I would want to be treated.

That is the Biblical answer to racism.  That is the solution that we really need.

Don't misunderstand me.  I think that there are institutional changes that need to be made.  I am convinced that police violence is an institutional problem that affects all members of our society, blacks included.  Law enforcement policies and perspectives need to be reevaluated and radically altered, but no matter what political or civil changes are made, racism will endure.  Racism is a philosophical and spiritual disease, which means that the cure must ultimately be philosophical and spiritual.

I know that some of you may be thinking that I am simply a white guy unaware of my white privilege.  Black people, you will say, don't have the luxury of forgetting about race.  Well, there is definitely some truth to that, but that doesn't change the fact that any solution to racism that presumes this outdated concept of race will be counterproductive.  Perpetuating this me vs you, black vs white mindset is bound to make racism worse.  We have to find a way to transcend this faulty notion of race if we even hope to see harmony in our land. 

Defining yourself by the color of your skin, which is an inherently-unreliable metric, is not the way to overcome racism.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

"Father, Forgive Them"

“Father, forgive them, for they know not what they do.” Forgiveness is hard.  Forgiveness is really, really hard. It’s difficult to forgive others who have genuinely harmed or offended us.   It’s easy to say , “I forgive you,” but it’s extremely difficult to feel it–to make peace in our hearts with the injustices that others have perpetrated against us. It just doesn’t feel right.  Sin should be punished!  Wrongs should be righted!  Right?! It’s difficult to forgive others when they ask for it.  It’s even more difficult to forgive them when they haven’t asked for it–when they don’t even recognize what they’ve done to hurt us. As our Savior hung upon His Cross, He asked the Father to forgive those nearby–those who were unwittingly contributing to the greatest injustice in the history of the world. These thieves, soldiers, and standers-by had no idea what was happening.  They had no idea that the jealousy of the Jews had placed Christ on that Cross...

The Real Presence & Paedocommunion: A Deeper Rift Between Reformed Churches

You're going back to Rome! Theological disagreements within the Reformed world, especially those of the last half century, often devolve into these sorts of accusations.  As controversialists like Doug Wilson and Peter Leithart began to break away from the larger conservative Presbyterian and Reformed denominations, it became clear that the rift was deeper than semantics and systematic minutiae.  Much like the Reformation four centuries before, the Table was a primary point of conflict.   What does it mean?  Who may partake?  What do we call it?    These questions, along with a few more, divided Reformed brethren as the physical elements of our religion reflected deeper conflicts.  Good men began to understand that the problem wasn't just in our logos, but in our pathos and ethos, as well. Paedocommunion (hereafter PC) has been one of the hottest points of contention.  PC has always been normal to me as I grew up with it.  I underst...

"The More Things Change..." or "Joe Biden Doing Joe Biden Things"

1 Samuel 2  relates the story of Eli, the well-meaning high priest whose only flaw (apparently) was his refusal to discipline his sons.  These sons, described as worthless men , utilized their position to abuse the people and indulge their lusts with impunity.  Eli's dereliction of duty brought his otherwise noble career in service to God's house to an ignominious end.   There are, of course, important differences between Eli and Joe Biden.  Joe Biden is not a religious leader (though he is a practicing Roman Catholic ), nor would I consider his record to be otherwise spotless.  However, similarly to Eli,  Biden's pardoning of his own  worthless son, Hunter, will prove to be his legacy.  His long (and I mean loooong) career in politics will likely be overshadowed, even in the eyes of those who previously respected him, by this one shameless act.  By pardoning his son despite  promising not to, Biden has yet again demonstrate...