Skip to main content

Is Christianity Superstitious?

Miracles.

God incarnate.

Angels and demons.

Visions and prophecies.

Creation ex nihilo.

The Holy Spirit indwelling the people of God.

The Bible is full of stories and ideas that are offensive to modern, naturalistic sensibilities.  This should come as no surprise, of course, as the Bible is the story of God's creation and redemption of mankind.  It is a supernatural book.  Acceptance of the Bible, and of the religion it sets forth, requires a belief in the supernatural.

For most people this is a given.  It should be a given.  Why, then, does modern Christianity try so hard to avoid sounding superstitious?  Why do we attempt to make our religion, and our Scriptures, palatable to the world by toning down the supernatural nature of our beliefs?  Why do we de-emphasize the miraculous nature of our faith and downplay the spiritual realities that transcend our five senses?

Modern Christians often look back with scorn upon the sacramentalism of past generations, scoffing at the idea that physical signs could confer spiritual graces.  We think that the Early Church and Medieval Church were so superstitious.  The irony, of course, is that the faith of our spiritual ancestors was far more physical than our own.  Their worship defined their lives and engaged their entire beings--mind, soul, and body--while ours is often wholly rational or mere lip service.  In a culture, and a Church, that has so deeply imbibed a secular/religious dualism, our religion often loses this holistic character.  In our modern attempt to escape the superstition of the sacraments, we have lost the connection between the physical and spiritual, the natural and the supernatural, the immanent and the transcendent. 

Maybe we need a little superstition.  Maybe we need a little mystery.  Maybe we need to stop worrying about how we are viewed by a world that refuses to believe in anything beyond this present life.  We claim to have the answers to the origin of the Universe, right?  We claim to know the meaning of life, right?  We claim to have the secret to eternal life, right?  Then why are we so afraid that people will view us as silly, backwards, or superstitious?   

There is more than this life, but there is not less than this life.  You cannot truly live this life, or the next, without embracing both the natural and the supernatural.  There is a part of every man that longs for more--more than this body, this world, this life.  Christianity, true Christianity, has always maintained the balance between the body and the soul.  The Church is where these distinct-yet-united aspects of humanity intersect.  The modern Church would do well to seek this balance once again, embracing the supernatural without fear of being labelled superstitious.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Real Presence & Paedocommunion: A Deeper Rift Between Reformed Churches

You're going back to Rome! Theological disagreements within the Reformed world, especially those of the last half century, often devolve into these sorts of accusations.  As controversialists like Doug Wilson and Peter Leithart began to break away from the larger conservative Presbyterian and Reformed denominations, it became clear that the rift was deeper than semantics and systematic minutiae.  Much like the Reformation four centuries before, the Table was a primary point of conflict.   What does it mean?  Who may partake?  What do we call it?    These questions, along with a few more, divided Reformed brethren as the physical elements of our religion reflected deeper conflicts.  Good men began to understand that the problem wasn't just in our logos, but in our pathos and ethos, as well. Paedocommunion (hereafter PC) has been one of the hottest points of contention.  PC has always been normal to me as I grew up with it.  I underst...
Post a Comment
Read more

Anglicanism, Paedocommunion, & Being Reformed

I consider myself Reformed.  I was baptized as a baby in a PCA church.  I grew up in a Reformed microdenomination that allowed its member churches to subscribe to any of the Reformed confessions (we subscribed to the Three Forms of Unity).  In many ways, whether I like it or not, I still think and act like a Reformed Presbyterian.   Some, however, would seek to deny me that label.  I suspect there are many reasons for this, but paramount among them is that I hold to Paedocommunion (hereafter PC), which, for some reason, is absolutely the worst thing ever to these people.  Some would go so far as to say that PC makes me a heretic, but they all agree that I am certainly not Reformed .   My recent engagement with these opponents of PC has caused me to reflect on what it means to be Reformed and what it means to be a Christian.  This online jousting has dovetailed well with some of my recent study, particularly  An Apology of the Church...
Post a Comment
Read more

Some Thoughts on the 2024 Election

So, we had an election earlier this week.  Perhaps you heard about it. I have done my best to remain mostly silent on political issues this time around because I have found that fixating on such matters does little for my mental or spiritual health.  Also, no one cares what I think.  Nevertheless, here are a few thoughts on our recent election. 1) I didn't vote for Donald Trump, but I'd be lying if I said I'm not glad he won.  To be clear, that says more about Kamala Harris than about Donald Trump. 2) This election seemed much cleaner--much less suspicious--than the sordid affair we had in 2020.  This election didn't feature any poll workers tallying (discovering? conjuring?) votes behind closed doors in the wee hours of the night, messy mail-in voting, or voter turnout beyond plausible expectations.  The 2020 election had me convinced that we would never see another peaceful, uncontested election, but, as contentious as things were this year, it seems like...
Post a Comment
Read more