Skip to main content

Epstein Didn't Kill Himself; or The Power of the Internet

The Internet is undefeated, my friends.

If you maintain any sort of a social media presence, you are doubtlessly familiar with this week's hottest meme.  It's not a single meme per se, nor even a single meme format.  Rather, it's the interposition of the words "Epstein didn't kill himself" into virtually every meme format ever devised.  When we sit back and consider the proliferation of Epstein-based memes, we can observe three things:

1) Memes are silly and amusing, but they are more than that.  They have become an art form, a means of communication, a way to make a statement.  They are the bastard child of newspaper editorials and satirical cartoons.  Instead of partisan cartoonists satirizing the politicians they don't like, we have artisans everywhere challenging the immovable moors of society; which leads me to my next point.

2) Americans, and I suspect we're not unique in this, deal with the harsh realities of life through meme-based humor.  Our sense of humor has become very dark and ironic, not to mention irreverent.  Perhaps it always was.  A generation raised on films by Mel Brooks and David Zucker have created a generation who are in turn are creating irreverent memes.  Our generation has become disillusioned with the political process and the untouchable elites, so we express our disgust and distrust through various online media.  We know we can't actually force the powers that be to conduct a thorough investigation into the Epstein case, to say nothing of actually bringing the guilty parties to justice, so we deal with it through perpetuating memes.  Creating memes is our form of public protest.  Instead of marching on Washington, an act that we recognize to be as noble as it is frivolous, we clutter the Internet with memes; which leads me to my next point.

3) Behold the power of the Internet!  Maybe the populace is not so powerless as we have resigned ourselves to being.  This Epstein story is not going away, despite the best efforts of the mainstream media.  Maybe the Internet is the undoing of the mainstream media, relegating the seemingly endless list of cable news programs to the same fate as AM radio.  Say what you will about the Internet, but it has at least as much potential for good as it does for evil.  The Internet is a tool, and, as with any tool, it is only as good as those who wield it.  The Internet allows a desperately disparate people to have a collective voice.  It facilitates the dissemination of information and enables the common man to expose the corruption that is so deeply rooted in so many of our national institutions.

Maybe I'm overestimating the significance of what is happening right now.  Maybe the Epstein case will eventually be shelved and people will forget that a serial trafficker with powerful friends died a suspicious death in prison.  Maybe these memes won't bring down the deep state or foment a revolution, but at least our children will know that we didn't buy the load of excrement that the media is trying to feed us.

The Internet is undefeated, my friends.  Let's hope it remains that way.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

4 Reasons I Affirm Paedocommunion

If you have interacted with me on social media, you know that I have always been outspoken on the issue of Paedocommunion .  It is a theological position and a liturgical practice about which I am passionate.  Having been raised, and having raised my children, at the Table, I cannot imagine attending a church that didn't allow PC.  I hope that when I am old and gray, I will still be an advocate for bringing little children to the Sacrament. Throughout the 12 years that I have had this blog, I have written scattered thoughts on the topic, but it appears that I have never written a concise summary of my reasons for affirming PC.  I was thoroughly convinced that I had, but I can't seem to locate it, so I guess I never did.  So, to rectify the omission, here are four reasons I hold to PC. 1) Paedocommunion is Biblical.   Any discussion of the topic should start here, and I would hope that both sides of the debate would make this assertion.  However, let me clarify what I mean when

1 Corinthians, the Covenant Hermeneutic, & Paedocommunion

As an adherent to Paedocommunion  (hereafter PC), I have always found it painfully ironic that Credocommunionists use 1 Corinthians 11 to withhold children (among others) from the Table.  One can imagine St. Paul shaking his head as he watches theologians using his discussion of unity at the Table to divide the body at the Table.  You're missing the point! he would say in exasperation.  Not only does 1 Corinthians 11 not forbid PC; I would go so far as to say that there is no better defense of PC in the New Testament than the epistle of 1 Corinthians. Credocommunionist logic is pretty straightforward.  1 Corinthians 11:28 says, "Let a person examine himself, then, and so eat of the bread and drink of the cup."  If, they argue, one is unable to fulfill the exhortation to examine himself, then he may not eat of the bread and drink of the cup.  This is a pretty logical deduction, right? Credobaptists would adamantly agree.  Acts 2:38 says, "Repent and be baptized...&quo

Why do you go to church on Sunday?

Why do you go to church on Sunday?  I would assume there are many reasons, but what is the primary reason that you get up on a cold, snowy Sunday morning and get your butt to church?  Further, why has the Church of Jesus Christ consistently gathered together on Sundays (among other days) for the last 2000 years? Throughout my 34 years of church attendance I would have proffered a variety of answers to that question.  As a child I'm sure I went to church because I had to, to see my cousins (who happened to be my best friends), to get bread and wine (weekly communion for the win), etc.  As my faith matured in adulthood these reasons remained, hopefully deepening, but to them were added concepts like rest and theological training. As I moved into Anglicanism I was struck by the deliberate focus on worship .  Why do Christians gather on Sunday morning?  To worship God!  Are teaching and fellowship important?  Absolutely!  Are they aspects of worship?  Certainly!  Is either the primary