Skip to main content

Is Donald Trump a Racist?

Well, ol' Donny is at it again!  His Twitter feed is ablaze with controversy, which is nothing new, but is nonetheless never a good look for the President of the United States of America.  I will say, that man is nothing if not entertaining!

As social media sites and cable news channels light up with the story, it seems that liberals in Washington and in the media are intent on force-feeding the American public this idea that Donald Trump is a raging racist, cheered on by the inherently-racist, corn-fed hillbillies of the Midwest; but is that narrative true?  Are his most recent tweets proof of inveterate hate and bigotry?

Is Donald Trump a racist?

Please, I beg of you, allow me to clarify something before I proceed.  This is not a defense of Donald Trump as a human being.  I am not pro-Trump, just as I am not anti-Trump.  I do my best to assess his words and actions as subjectively as possible.  He is our President, so, as a Christian, I try to respect him as a governing official, even when he makes it very difficult to do.  I didn't vote for Trump and I'm genuinely not sure what I'll do next time around. 

That being said, Donald Trump is a lot of things, but he is not a racist.  He may be a philanderer, a narcissist, and a windbag, but I don't think he's a racist.  He is belligerent and has less tact than my four-year-old (heck, my two-year-old!), but at least he's nondiscriminatory--he's pretty much rude to everyone!  He's a rich New Yorker who views people as means to ends and thinks that talking loudly is the way to get what you want in life.  His life story, replete with chequers, reads like an exhibition of the seven deadly sins.  No, Donald Trump hasn't given us any reason to believe he is a "good person," but he also hasn't demonstrated himself to be a racist either.  The liberals want you to believe that he is some sort of white nationalist, but his past just doesn't bear it out.  His personal life, his political life, and his career all demonstrate that he's never had any trouble associating with anyone.

But what about his recent tweets?  Aren't they racist?

Hardly.  They are brash, but they are not racist.

Trump's message is pretty clear.  He is clapping back at those liberals, the loudest of which have happened to be minority females, who have publicly excoriated him ever since they stepped into office.  These women have demonstrated that they oppose the fundamental principles upon which our nation was founded, publicly criticizing our country and openly supporting policies that are explicitly socialistic.  Donald Trump is saying, "If you hate the U.S. so much, why don't you go back to the countries from which you came?"

And, you know what?

He sort of has a point.  Sure, he needs to polish his language and tweet a little bit (okay, a lot) less, but he has a point.  Some of these minority females come from areas of the world that are known for crime, corruption, and discrimination.  Yes, that may be a broad stereotype, but life is full of broad brush strokes because they're generally accurate.  These politicians, or their immediate ancestors, came to the U.S. for a reason (or multiple reasons), one would assume.  They came to this country because of the opportunity it offers, both to improve one's standard of living and to raise their families in safer environments than back home.  The problem is that these immigrants have come to the U.S., gained power, and are now seeking to use it to implement the kinds of social and economic policies that contributed to the downfall of their home countries.   

There are plenty of immigrants who have not done this.  Millions of immigrants have come to our land, embraced our culture, and contributed economically, even while choosing to honor their heritage.  Donald Trump is not criticizing those immigrants.  After all, he is descended from immigrants (we all are, of course, in a sense).  He even married two immigrants!

This isn't about nationality, ethnicity, or color.  It's not about race.  It's about ideology.  Admittedly, Donny makes it easy for the media to construe it as racist and xenophobic, but if you actually read his words, his point is clear.  Donald Trump, and many of us hardworking Americans, are sick of upstart politicians telling us that our country sucks and that we need to be like ____________.  It's especially troubling when the voices shouting this mantra most loudly belong to immigrants who emigrated those areas because poverty, crime, etc.

No, Donald Trump isn't a racist.  He has his fair share of character and personality flaws, but he's not a racist.

P.S. Make sure to read the tweets yourself.  You have no right to criticize him if you don't take the time to read his words, ramblings though they may be.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

4 Reasons I Affirm Paedocommunion

If you have interacted with me on social media, you know that I have always been outspoken on the issue of Paedocommunion .  It is a theological position and a liturgical practice about which I am passionate.  Having been raised, and having raised my children, at the Table, I cannot imagine attending a church that didn't allow PC.  I hope that when I am old and gray, I will still be an advocate for bringing little children to the Sacrament. Throughout the 12 years that I have had this blog, I have written scattered thoughts on the topic, but it appears that I have never written a concise summary of my reasons for affirming PC.  I was thoroughly convinced that I had, but I can't seem to locate it, so I guess I never did.  So, to rectify the omission, here are four reasons I hold to PC. 1) Paedocommunion is Biblical.   Any discussion of the topic should start here, and I would hope that both sides of the debate would make this assertion.  However, let me clarify what I mean when

1 Corinthians, the Covenant Hermeneutic, & Paedocommunion

As an adherent to Paedocommunion  (hereafter PC), I have always found it painfully ironic that Credocommunionists use 1 Corinthians 11 to withhold children (among others) from the Table.  One can imagine St. Paul shaking his head as he watches theologians using his discussion of unity at the Table to divide the body at the Table.  You're missing the point! he would say in exasperation.  Not only does 1 Corinthians 11 not forbid PC; I would go so far as to say that there is no better defense of PC in the New Testament than the epistle of 1 Corinthians. Credocommunionist logic is pretty straightforward.  1 Corinthians 11:28 says, "Let a person examine himself, then, and so eat of the bread and drink of the cup."  If, they argue, one is unable to fulfill the exhortation to examine himself, then he may not eat of the bread and drink of the cup.  This is a pretty logical deduction, right? Credobaptists would adamantly agree.  Acts 2:38 says, "Repent and be baptized...&quo

Why do you go to church on Sunday?

Why do you go to church on Sunday?  I would assume there are many reasons, but what is the primary reason that you get up on a cold, snowy Sunday morning and get your butt to church?  Further, why has the Church of Jesus Christ consistently gathered together on Sundays (among other days) for the last 2000 years? Throughout my 34 years of church attendance I would have proffered a variety of answers to that question.  As a child I'm sure I went to church because I had to, to see my cousins (who happened to be my best friends), to get bread and wine (weekly communion for the win), etc.  As my faith matured in adulthood these reasons remained, hopefully deepening, but to them were added concepts like rest and theological training. As I moved into Anglicanism I was struck by the deliberate focus on worship .  Why do Christians gather on Sunday morning?  To worship God!  Are teaching and fellowship important?  Absolutely!  Are they aspects of worship?  Certainly!  Is either the primary