Skip to main content

The Scandal of Self-Denial

"Woe unto those who call evil good and good evil..."

Those are some powerful, frightening words.  They are also increasingly descriptive of the moral condition of the United States of America.

We live in a postmodern age (I suppose we're past postmodern by now).

Our religion is self.  Our ideals are happiness and personal fulfillment.  Our creed, so unyieldingly maintained, is "Be yourself!"

We glorify the present, the temporary, the vain.

We have institutionalized selfishness.  We are absolutely obsessed with ourselves.  We're so obsessed with self that we're obsessed with other people being obsessed with themselves.

Morality is relative, subjective, individually-defined.

It has become clear that the only immoral act, the only behavior that we will not tolerate, is that which elicits guilt.  Naked dudes dancing around child drag queens?  Yeah, that's cool.  Telling dudes that they're dudes and not girls?  Nah...that's intolerant!

You cannot condemn any behavior, lifestyle, or choice as immoral.  You cannot speak out against the evils of society.  You cannot, Heaven forbid, pass judgment.

We will not tolerate "intolerance."

It's peculiar, really.  We're so obsessed with tolerance that not only is "intolerance" intolerable, but so is self-denial.  We will not tolerate other people refusing to tolerate patterns of behavior in their own lives!

Self-denial is repulsive to those who refuse to practice it.  Gluttons hate to see people eating moderately.  Drunkards always encourage others to have that extra drink.

Self-denial is now itself offensive.

How dare you ask me to ignore my feelings?  How dare you ask me to refrain from indulging my lusts?  How dare you ask me to forego something that I want?  How dare you ask me to do something that is self-disinterested?

Self-denial has become scandalous.

Unfortunately, this thinking has infiltrated the Church itself.  Pastors preach self-help sermons designed to guide the hearer to a better "you."  Sermons are human-centric.  Talking about sin is the grand faux pas.  Declaring the justice, righteousness, and holiness of God, let alone His command for us to emulate His holiness, is out of style.  The pastor is there to fill seats and coffers, a spiritual CEO in a commercial Church age, not make people feel bad or compel them to change.  The call to self-denial has gone silent.   

If your pastor has never said something that makes you feel guilty, you need to find a new church.

Our Savior made it clear that self-denial is an integral part of salvation.  Self-denial is a definitive mark of the Christian life, and, therefore, the Christian himself.  Self-denial and cross-bearing are prerequisites to following Jesus Christ.  Never failing to practice what He preached, Jesus gave us the greatest example of this teaching imaginable in the Incarnation.

"Woe unto those who evil good and good evil..."

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

4 Reasons I Affirm Paedocommunion

If you have interacted with me on social media, you know that I have always been outspoken on the issue of Paedocommunion .  It is a theological position and a liturgical practice about which I am passionate.  Having been raised, and having raised my children, at the Table, I cannot imagine attending a church that didn't allow PC.  I hope that when I am old and gray, I will still be an advocate for bringing little children to the Sacrament. Throughout the 12 years that I have had this blog, I have written scattered thoughts on the topic, but it appears that I have never written a concise summary of my reasons for affirming PC.  I was thoroughly convinced that I had, but I can't seem to locate it, so I guess I never did.  So, to rectify the omission, here are four reasons I hold to PC. 1) Paedocommunion is Biblical.   Any discussion of the topic should start here, and I would hope that both sides of the debate would make this assertion.  However, let me clarify what I mean when

1 Corinthians, the Covenant Hermeneutic, & Paedocommunion

As an adherent to Paedocommunion  (hereafter PC), I have always found it painfully ironic that Credocommunionists use 1 Corinthians 11 to withhold children (among others) from the Table.  One can imagine St. Paul shaking his head as he watches theologians using his discussion of unity at the Table to divide the body at the Table.  You're missing the point! he would say in exasperation.  Not only does 1 Corinthians 11 not forbid PC; I would go so far as to say that there is no better defense of PC in the New Testament than the epistle of 1 Corinthians. Credocommunionist logic is pretty straightforward.  1 Corinthians 11:28 says, "Let a person examine himself, then, and so eat of the bread and drink of the cup."  If, they argue, one is unable to fulfill the exhortation to examine himself, then he may not eat of the bread and drink of the cup.  This is a pretty logical deduction, right? Credobaptists would adamantly agree.  Acts 2:38 says, "Repent and be baptized...&quo

Why do you go to church on Sunday?

Why do you go to church on Sunday?  I would assume there are many reasons, but what is the primary reason that you get up on a cold, snowy Sunday morning and get your butt to church?  Further, why has the Church of Jesus Christ consistently gathered together on Sundays (among other days) for the last 2000 years? Throughout my 34 years of church attendance I would have proffered a variety of answers to that question.  As a child I'm sure I went to church because I had to, to see my cousins (who happened to be my best friends), to get bread and wine (weekly communion for the win), etc.  As my faith matured in adulthood these reasons remained, hopefully deepening, but to them were added concepts like rest and theological training. As I moved into Anglicanism I was struck by the deliberate focus on worship .  Why do Christians gather on Sunday morning?  To worship God!  Are teaching and fellowship important?  Absolutely!  Are they aspects of worship?  Certainly!  Is either the primary