Skip to main content

Titus Sermon Series/ Part 4: The Opposition

Titus 1:10-16: The Opposition
I.                  Introduction
a.     Last time we saw         
                                                             i.      How important it is to choose good elders
                                                          ii.      Subsequently, what type of character they must have
b.    This time we will see the opposite—the opposition
II.               Verse 10: The Circumcision
a.     “For”
                                                             i.      This is a segue
                                                          ii.      Verse 9—Pastors must be able to teach God’s people and to rebuke those who oppose the truth
b.    Why?  Because there are many people out there who lead others astray
c.     Keep in mind that Paul is here describing both those who are leading others astray, as well as those being led astray
d.    What do the false shepherds—wolves—look like?
                                                             i.      Insubordinate
1.    Rebellious
2.    Same word as 1:6
3.    Used in reference to a horse that refused to be bridled or a soldier who would not obey his superiors
4.    False shepherds almost always have trouble accepting authority—they only respect their own opinions
                                                          ii.      Empty talkers
1.    Matarologos—empty or vain words
2.    They talk and they talk but they never really say anything
3.    Gill: “Vain talkers, who deliver out in their discourses empty, trifling, superficial, and frivolous things; which have no solidity and substance in them, nor do they tend to edification; only great swelling words of vanity, vain jangling and babbling about things to no profit.”
                                                       iii.      Deceivers
1.    Refers to self-deceivers who lead into their own delusions
2.    They are constantly taking advantage of those with a narrow mind
3.    They have an evangelistic zeal that points people more towards themselves than God
                                                       iv.      Circumcision
1.    “Especially”—there were many types of people for which Titus should watch, but the Circumcision was worth of specifically noting
2.    We encounter the Judaizers throughout the New Testament, especially in the book of Galatians
3.    They were Jews who had accepted Christ but tried to impose the ceremonial law on the Gentiles
4.    It’s important to keep this in mind in order to understand the rest of this chapter
III.           Verse 11: Our Response
a.     What is the job of elders?  To silence them
                                                             i.      Paul is not calling Titus to take civil action
                                                          ii.      Titus must use Biblical reasoning to defeat them
b.    Why?  Because they were upsetting whole families
                                                             i.      Upset—overturn, destroy, subvert
                                                          ii.      Their false teaching was not simply attracting a random person here and there, but was leading to the damnation of whole families
c.     We see their real motivation here
                                                             i.      They are teaching for shameful gain
                                                          ii.      This is why Paul stresses that an elder not be greedy
                                                       iii.      It makes me think of televangelists like Jim Bakker and Paul Crouch—the prosperity Gospel
                                                       iv.      Paul tells Titus that he will recognize false teachers by the fact that they are really looking to further their own fame and wealth
IV.           Verses 12-13a: The Cretans
a.     Paul reminds Titus of his mission field
b.    This shows that Paul was warning Titus about false teachers and those who would easily be led astray because of their corrupt character
c.     Paul describes the Cretans with not-so-nice words by referencing “one of their own” who said that they are liars, evil beasts, and lazy gluttons
d.    The Cretans were known to be extremely lazy, given to extravagance (gluttony and drunkenness), and barbaric
e.     They were best known, however, for being liars—to be like a Cretan was a proverb used to described people who lied
f.      This quote is from Epimenides of Gnossus, who was a semi-mythical character born about 650 years before Jesus
                                                             i.      Paul calls him a poet
1.    Poets were often regarded as prophets because they were thought to communicate messages from muses
2.    Legend has it that he had fell asleep for 57 years, after which he awoke with the gift of prophecy
3.    He was considered one of the seven wise men of Greece
                                                          ii.      Paul actually quotes him another time: Acts 17:28
                                                       iii.      Paul references him here especially because he happened to be from the island of Crete, and would therefore know the type of character they had and be honest about it
                                                       iv.      Paul, having interacted with the Cretans somewhat briefly, came away with the same impression
g.     Is Paul being a racist/bigot here?
                                                             i.      No, Paul is simply trying to warn Titus about the special circumstances in which Titus was called to organize the churches
                                                          ii.      All pastors have to deal with sinners, but Titus had to deal with sinners, but Titus had to deal with people who were renowned around the world for multiple sinful lifestyles
                                                       iii.      It would be like an older pastor warning a younger pastor about the special caution necessary when ministering in Las Vegas or Los Angeles
                                                       iv.      Remember—Titus was supposed to find men of character—how much more difficult would this be and how much more careful would Titus have to be doing this in such a sinful place!
V.              Verses 13b-14: How do we react to them?
a.     Paul tells Titus to rebuke them sharply?
                                                             i.      Rebuke—to expose, to refute, to show fault, to convince
                                                          ii.      This word carries the idea of public reproof—Paul wants Titus to rebuke these people out in the open so that everyone would see that they were false teachers who were spreading lies
                                                       iii.      Sharply—cuttingly 
b.    Why?  So that they would be sound in the faith
                                                             i.      Notice: the rebuke was for their own good!
                                                          ii.      Sound=healthy; the way it’s supposed to be
                                                       iii.      There is a surgical metaphor here—Paul is calling Titus to perform spiritual amputation here
                                                       iv.      In order to have sound faith, they must cut off the:
1.    Jewish myths     
a.     Paul is not referring to the Old Testament here
b.    Paul is referring to the thousands of extra “fences” and interpretations of the Law that the Jews had piled up around the Law
2.    Commands of people
a.     The Jews preferred man’s Word to God’s Word
b.    This is the same thing for which Jesus often rebuked the scribes and the Pharisees
c.     Mark 7:13—Jesus tells them that they make void the Word of God by their tradition
                                                          v.      Paul wanted Titus to make sure the Cretan Christians were being instructed with the Word of God and not the Word of man
VI.           Verse 15: A Quick Refutation
a.     Paul is not saying that anything we do is okay, so long as our hearts are sincere
b.    Paul is specifically referring here to the ceremonial and dietary restrictions that the Judaizers were trying to impose upon the Gentiles
c.     Paul tells them that no food or drink is more pure than another—the heart is the real issue
                                                             i.      All actions flow from the mind and conscience
                                                          ii.      If a man’s mind/conscience is sinful, nothing he does can be good
VII.       Verse 16: Evidence
a.     Paul backs up his assertions in Verse 15 with evidence
b.    The way these Judaizers lived demonstrated that they were not true followers of Christ, despite their profession of faith
c.     Clarke: “Their profession and practice were at continual variance.  Full of a pretended faith, while utterly destitute of those works by which a genuine faith is accredited and proved.”
                                                             i.      Detestable—abominable; abhorrent, disgusting
                                                          ii.      Disobedient—really means unbelieving and unwilling to be persuaded; they just won’t heed the truth
                                                       iii.      Unfit for good works—not able to pass the test; rejected
d.    Titus needed to be vigilant to protect Christ’s sheep from men with character like this
VIII.    Application
a.     There are wolves out there who destroy souls
                                                             i.      The Bible often warns us about them
                                                          ii.      Paul warns the Ephesian elders in Acts 20:28-30: “Pay careful attention to yourselves and to all the flock, in which the Holy Spirit has made you overseers, to care for the church of God, which he obtained with his own blood.  I know that after my departure fierce wolves will come in among you, not sparing the flock; and from among your own selves will arise men speaking twisted things, to draw away the disciples after them.”
b.    Sometimes elders must sharply rebuke those who are leading others astray
                                                             i.       The good shepherds need to make sure the sheep know who the wolves are, and sometimes this means that they need to do so publicly
                                                          ii.      It is good to give people the benefit of the doubt, but we must not be afraid to call a spade a spade
                                                       iii.      Men like Joel Osteen and Rob Bell are false teachers!
c.     Leaders must be able to submit!
d.    Purity begins in the heart, as does corruption
                                                             i.      Both will manifest themselves in behavior
                                                          ii.      Things are not good or evil—people are
                                                       iii.      Matthew 15:18-20: “But what comes of the mouth proceeds from the heart, and this defiles a person.  For out of the heart come evil thoughts, murder, adultery, sexual immorality, theft, false witness, slander.  These are what defile a person.  But to eat with unwashed hands does not defile anyone.”
                                                       iv.      We must make sure out hearts are right with God, or else our lives will never glorify Him
IX.           Conclusion
a.     Elders and aspiring elders
                                                             i.      Last time I encouraged you to personalize and emulate the list
                                                          ii.      This list is just as important
1.    Make sure this doesn’t describe you
2.    Examine your hearts as you read this passage
3.    Ask God to cleanse you from any of these traits you may have, even in the slightest way
b.    Congregation
                                                             i.      Pray for your leaders
                                                          ii.      Hold your leaders accountable
                                                       iii.      Submit to your elders, but don’t be blind sheep—blindly following the wolves into destruction

                                                       iv.      Be Bereans!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

4 Reasons I Affirm Paedocommunion

If you have interacted with me on social media, you know that I have always been outspoken on the issue of Paedocommunion .  It is a theological position and a liturgical practice about which I am passionate.  Having been raised, and having raised my children, at the Table, I cannot imagine attending a church that didn't allow PC.  I hope that when I am old and gray, I will still be an advocate for bringing little children to the Sacrament. Throughout the 12 years that I have had this blog, I have written scattered thoughts on the topic, but it appears that I have never written a concise summary of my reasons for affirming PC.  I was thoroughly convinced that I had, but I can't seem to locate it, so I guess I never did.  So, to rectify the omission, here are four reasons I hold to PC. 1) Paedocommunion is Biblical.   Any discussion of the topic should start here, and I would hope that both sides of the debate would make this assertion.  However, l...

The Real Presence & Paedocommunion: A Deeper Rift Between Reformed Churches

You're going back to Rome! Theological disagreements within the Reformed world, especially those of the last half century, often devolve into these sorts of accusations.  As controversialists like Doug Wilson and Peter Leithart began to break away from the larger conservative Presbyterian and Reformed denominations, it became clear that the rift was deeper than semantics and systematic minutiae.  Much like the Reformation four centuries before, the Table was a primary point of conflict.   What does it mean?  Who may partake?  What do we call it?    These questions, along with a few more, divided Reformed brethren as the physical elements of our religion reflected deeper conflicts.  Good men began to understand that the problem wasn't just in our logos, but in our pathos and ethos, as well. Paedocommunion (hereafter PC) has been one of the hottest points of contention.  PC has always been normal to me as I grew up with it.  I underst...

Anglicanism, Paedocommunion, & Being Reformed

I consider myself Reformed.  I was baptized as a baby in a PCA church.  I grew up in a Reformed microdenomination that allowed its member churches to subscribe to any of the Reformed confessions (we subscribed to the Three Forms of Unity).  In many ways, whether I like it or not, I still think and act like a Reformed Presbyterian.   Some, however, would seek to deny me that label.  I suspect there are many reasons for this, but paramount among them is that I hold to Paedocommunion (hereafter PC), which, for some reason, is absolutely the worst thing ever to these people.  Some would go so far as to say that PC makes me a heretic, but they all agree that I am certainly not Reformed .   My recent engagement with these opponents of PC has caused me to reflect on what it means to be Reformed and what it means to be a Christian.  This online jousting has dovetailed well with some of my recent study, particularly  An Apology of the Church...