Skip to main content

Psalm 130:5-8

Psalm 130:5-8/Waiting on Yahweh
1.    Last time we saw
a.     The author recognized that he had no right to approach God’s presence
b.    He had hope of forgiveness because he knew God is merciful
c.     Forgiveness leads to a life of service to God
2.    Verses 5-6: Having been forgiven, he waits on God
a.     These verses give us two beautiful metaphors
b.    Wait
                                                             i.      Qavah
1.    Literally, to twist or weave a cord or rope
2.    By extension, to wait or await eagerly and expectantly
3.    The connection is things being bound—we must be bound together with God
4.    Our souls—whole person—must be interwoven with God
5.    This results in strength; reliance
6.    John Piper: “To wait on God means to pause and soberly consider our own inadequacy and the Lord’s all-sufficiency, and to seek counsel and help from the Lord, and to hope in Him…”
                                                           ii.      How eagerly does he wait?
1.    More than they that watch for the morning
2.    Most commentators agree that the author is comparing himself to a night guard who has to keep watch until morning
3.    Morning brings deliverance
4.    With the same sort of eagerness he waits upon God
                                                        iii.      Why does he wait?
1.     He hopes in God’s word
2.    He does not wait presumptuously or bashfully; he waits upon God confidently because God has promised deliverance
3.    Verses 7-8: The Context Broadens
a.     Having personally found forgiveness and waited on God, the author now encourages his brethren to join Him
b.    Remember, this was a song of Ascents
c.     He encourages all of Israel to wait upon God, repeating the truths of God’s mercy
d.    The author assures everyone that this mercy is not limited in power or number, but is available and sufficient for all
e.     He uses two words that describe the sufficiency of God’s redemption (deliverance or ransom):
                                                             i.      Plenteous—full or abundant
                                                           ii.      All—He will not simply deliver from a few or even most of our sins, but all of them
4.    Application
a.     We must wait upon God
                                                             i.      We must bind ourselves to Him
                                                           ii.      We must rely upon Him
                                                        iii.      Andrew Murray: “If any are inclined to despond, because they do not have such patience, let them be of good courage. It is in the course of our feeble and very imperfect waiting that God Himself, by His hidden power, strengthens us and works out in us the patience of the great saints, the patience of Christ Himself.”
b.    God’s grace is sufficient
                                                             i.      It is sufficient to deliver all who come
                                                           ii.      It is sufficient to deliver us completely
                                                        iii.      Barnes: “It is ample; it is full; it abounds. It is not limited; it is not exhausted; it cannot be exhausted. So we may always feel when we come before God, that his mercy is ample for all the needs of all the sinful and the suffering; that the provisions of his grace are unexhausted and inexhaustible.”
                                                        iv.      No one who comes to God in repentant faith will be told that the last pardon was just handed out
                                                           v.      No one who comes to God in repentant faith will be told that his sins are just too bad or too numerous for God to forgive
Henry: “There is an all-sufficient fullness of merit and grace in the Redeemer, enough for all, enough for each; enough for me.”

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

4 Reasons I Affirm Paedocommunion

If you have interacted with me on social media, you know that I have always been outspoken on the issue of Paedocommunion .  It is a theological position and a liturgical practice about which I am passionate.  Having been raised, and having raised my children, at the Table, I cannot imagine attending a church that didn't allow PC.  I hope that when I am old and gray, I will still be an advocate for bringing little children to the Sacrament. Throughout the 12 years that I have had this blog, I have written scattered thoughts on the topic, but it appears that I have never written a concise summary of my reasons for affirming PC.  I was thoroughly convinced that I had, but I can't seem to locate it, so I guess I never did.  So, to rectify the omission, here are four reasons I hold to PC. 1) Paedocommunion is Biblical.   Any discussion of the topic should start here, and I would hope that both sides of the debate would make this assertion.  However, l...

1 Corinthians, the Covenant Hermeneutic, & Paedocommunion

As an adherent to Paedocommunion  (hereafter PC), I have always found it painfully ironic that Credocommunionists use 1 Corinthians 11 to withhold children (among others) from the Table.  One can imagine St. Paul shaking his head as he watches theologians using his discussion of unity at the Table to divide the body at the Table.  You're missing the point! he would say in exasperation.  Not only does 1 Corinthians 11 not forbid PC; I would go so far as to say that there is no better defense of PC in the New Testament than the epistle of 1 Corinthians. Credocommunionist logic is pretty straightforward.  1 Corinthians 11:28 says, "Let a person examine himself, then, and so eat of the bread and drink of the cup."  If, they argue, one is unable to fulfill the exhortation to examine himself, then he may not eat of the bread and drink of the cup.  This is a pretty logical deduction, right? Credobaptists would adamantly agree.  Acts 2:38 says, "Repe...

The Real Presence & Paedocommunion: A Deeper Rift Between Reformed Churches

You're going back to Rome! Theological disagreements within the Reformed world, especially those of the last half century, often devolve into these sorts of accusations.  As controversialists like Doug Wilson and Peter Leithart began to break away from the larger conservative Presbyterian and Reformed denominations, it became clear that the rift was deeper than semantics and systematic minutiae.  Much like the Reformation four centuries before, the Table was a primary point of conflict.   What does it mean?  Who may partake?  What do we call it?    These questions, along with a few more, divided Reformed brethren as the physical elements of our religion reflected deeper conflicts.  Good men began to understand that the problem wasn't just in our logos, but in our pathos and ethos, as well. Paedocommunion (hereafter PC) has been one of the hottest points of contention.  PC has always been normal to me as I grew up with it.  I underst...