Skip to main content

Leviticus 21:16-24: Blemished Priests

And the LORD spake unto Moses, saying, Speak unto Aaron, saying, Whosoever he be of thy seed in their generations that hath any blemish, let him not approach to offer the bread of his God.
For whatsoever man he be that hath a blemish, he shall not approach: a blind man, or a lame, or he that hath a flat nose, or any thing superfluous, Or a man that is brokenfooted, or brokenhanded, Or crookbackt, or a dwarf, or that hath a blemish in his eye, or be scurvy, or scabbed, or hath his stones broken; No man that hath a blemish of the seed of Aaron the priest shall come nigh to offer the offerings of the LORD made by fire: he hath a blemish; he shall not come nigh to offer the bread of his God. He shall eat the bread of his God, both of the most holy, and of the holy. Only he shall not go in unto the vail, nor come nigh unto the altar, because he hath a blemish; that he profane not my sanctuaries: for I the LORD do sanctify them. And Moses told it unto Aaron, and to his sons, and unto all the children of Israel.

1.     Context
a.     In Leviticus 21:1-15 we see rules specifically for the priests 
b.    The priests had stricter guidelines
1.    Dead bodies
2.    Marry a widow/divorced woman
c.     Verses 16-24 discusses the physical disqualifications for being a priest
2.     Verses 16-24
a.     16-18a
                                                             i.      God tells Moses to deliver a message to Aaron, who, as High Priest, was responsible for making sure everyone knew and fulfilled their duties
                                                          ii.      Those who have a physical deformity are not allowed to enter God’s presence
b.    Verses 18b-21
                                                             i.      Moses provides an example of such deformities
c.     Verses 22-24
                                                             i.      Moses clarifies exactly what he means
                                                          ii.      They could still live normally and eat that which was for the priests, but they were not to function as priests by entering into the Holy Place or the Most Holy Place—the presence of God
                         iii.  God's presence sanctified the sanctuaries (Vs 23)
3.     Practical Application
a.     The Holiness of God
                                                             i.      Having a physical deformity was not sinful or morally inferior, but only perfection could enter into God’s presence (all animals offered to God had to be blemish free as well)
                                                          ii.      Habbakuk 1:13: “Thou art of purer eyes than to behold evil, and canst not look on iniquity…”
                                                       iii.      Isaiah 59:2: “But your iniquities have separated between you and your God and your sins have hid his face from you, that he will not hear.”
                                                       iv.      God and sin cannot coexist
                         v.  Just as God's presence sanctified the inner parts of the Tabernacle/Temple, so too the Holy Spirit sanctifies the Church
b.    The grace of God
                                                             i.      Verse 22
                                                          ii.      Though God was using these priests with deformities as an example by which to teach His people, he still provided for their well being
                                                       iii.      God cares for all of His people, even those who have weaknesses
                                                       iv.      Those who will not work should not eat, but those who cannot work may.  The Church ought to care for those who are unable to work
c.     The purity of our High Priest, Jesus
                                                             i.      Only a perfect priest could enter God’s presence, and that’s exactly what Jesus was
                                                          ii.      Jesus was the spotless priest and the spotless Lamb
                                                       iii.      Hebrews 4:15: “For we do not have a high priest who is unable to sympathize with our weaknesses, but one who in every respect was tempted as we are, yet without sin.”
                                                       iv.      This is the glorious privilege of living in the New Covenant—because we have a perfect High Priest, one who offered a perfect sacrifice once for all, we are able to draw into God’s presence, despite our blemishes
                                                          v.      We are all priests who may enter into God’s presence through the intercession of Christ (1 Peter 2:9—royal priesthood)
                                                       vi.      Hebrews 4:16: “Let us then with confidence draw near to the throne of grace, that we may receive mercy and find grace to help in time of need.”

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Real Presence & Paedocommunion: A Deeper Rift Between Reformed Churches

You're going back to Rome! Theological disagreements within the Reformed world, especially those of the last half century, often devolve into these sorts of accusations.  As controversialists like Doug Wilson and Peter Leithart began to break away from the larger conservative Presbyterian and Reformed denominations, it became clear that the rift was deeper than semantics and systematic minutiae.  Much like the Reformation four centuries before, the Table was a primary point of conflict.   What does it mean?  Who may partake?  What do we call it?    These questions, along with a few more, divided Reformed brethren as the physical elements of our religion reflected deeper conflicts.  Good men began to understand that the problem wasn't just in our logos, but in our pathos and ethos, as well. Paedocommunion (hereafter PC) has been one of the hottest points of contention.  PC has always been normal to me as I grew up with it.  I underst...

Some Thoughts on the 2024 Election

So, we had an election earlier this week.  Perhaps you heard about it. I have done my best to remain mostly silent on political issues this time around because I have found that fixating on such matters does little for my mental or spiritual health.  Also, no one cares what I think.  Nevertheless, here are a few thoughts on our recent election. 1) I didn't vote for Donald Trump, but I'd be lying if I said I'm not glad he won.  To be clear, that says more about Kamala Harris than about Donald Trump. 2) This election seemed much cleaner--much less suspicious--than the sordid affair we had in 2020.  This election didn't feature any poll workers tallying (discovering? conjuring?) votes behind closed doors in the wee hours of the night, messy mail-in voting, or voter turnout beyond plausible expectations.  The 2020 election had me convinced that we would never see another peaceful, uncontested election, but, as contentious as things were this year, it seems like...

Haiku for Bethany

Such a pretty girl The fairest, the loveliest Lovelier each day Kind, caring, friendly Generous, sacrificial Gentle, powerful Her love and her touch Sparks igniting in my chest Souls entwined, yet freed   Golden hair, brown eyes That bright smile that captured My gaze and my heart