Skip to main content

A Willing Heart

    As I'm reading through the New Testament, I keep on finding passages with such valid applications for our own day.  Part of my reading today included Luke 1.  There is passage is mainly focusing on the birth of John the Baptist, but Luke takes time to introduce Mary, John's aunt.  He shares the story of the angel, Gabriel, appearing to Mary and telling her that she would have a miraculous pregnancy, and that the child would inherit the throne of His father, David.  That's a lot to swallow, I'm guessing.  Notice Mary's answer.  She says, "Behold, I am the servant of the Lord, let it be to me according to your word."  Mary embraces without reservation God's will for her life.  She understood her role.  She was God's servant.  Her very existence is at His mercy.  How could she refuse to follow her master's will?  If He wanted her to live a normal life, so be it.  If He wanted her to be the virgin mother of the Savior of the world, so be it.

    This is the attitude that we should seek to cultivate.  Regardless of what God asks us to do, we should do it.  If it's monotonous and boring, then we must be faithful.  If it means abandoning life as we know it and traveling the world, then we must be faithful in that as well.  The only question Mary really asks is, "Wait, how's that gonna work since I'm a virgin?"  Once the angel assures her that God has it covered, Mary humbly cooperates.   She knew that this task was not within her power to accomplish, but if God wanted it done through her, He would find a way to accomplish it.

    We need to see ourselves as servants of a Holy God--a God Who loves to work through His Church.  We need to do anything God asks of us.  We need to respect and trust His will, knowing that His ways are better than our ways.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

4 Reasons I Affirm Paedocommunion

If you have interacted with me on social media, you know that I have always been outspoken on the issue of Paedocommunion .  It is a theological position and a liturgical practice about which I am passionate.  Having been raised, and having raised my children, at the Table, I cannot imagine attending a church that didn't allow PC.  I hope that when I am old and gray, I will still be an advocate for bringing little children to the Sacrament. Throughout the 12 years that I have had this blog, I have written scattered thoughts on the topic, but it appears that I have never written a concise summary of my reasons for affirming PC.  I was thoroughly convinced that I had, but I can't seem to locate it, so I guess I never did.  So, to rectify the omission, here are four reasons I hold to PC. 1) Paedocommunion is Biblical.   Any discussion of the topic should start here, and I would hope that both sides of the debate would make this assertion.  However, l...
Post a Comment
Read more

1 Corinthians, the Covenant Hermeneutic, & Paedocommunion

As an adherent to Paedocommunion  (hereafter PC), I have always found it painfully ironic that Credocommunionists use 1 Corinthians 11 to withhold children (among others) from the Table.  One can imagine St. Paul shaking his head as he watches theologians using his discussion of unity at the Table to divide the body at the Table.  You're missing the point! he would say in exasperation.  Not only does 1 Corinthians 11 not forbid PC; I would go so far as to say that there is no better defense of PC in the New Testament than the epistle of 1 Corinthians. Credocommunionist logic is pretty straightforward.  1 Corinthians 11:28 says, "Let a person examine himself, then, and so eat of the bread and drink of the cup."  If, they argue, one is unable to fulfill the exhortation to examine himself, then he may not eat of the bread and drink of the cup.  This is a pretty logical deduction, right? Credobaptists would adamantly agree.  Acts 2:38 says, "Repe...
Post a Comment
Read more

The Real Presence & Paedocommunion: A Deeper Rift Between Reformed Churches

You're going back to Rome! Theological disagreements within the Reformed world, especially those of the last half century, often devolve into these sorts of accusations.  As controversialists like Doug Wilson and Peter Leithart began to break away from the larger conservative Presbyterian and Reformed denominations, it became clear that the rift was deeper than semantics and systematic minutiae.  Much like the Reformation four centuries before, the Table was a primary point of conflict.   What does it mean?  Who may partake?  What do we call it?    These questions, along with a few more, divided Reformed brethren as the physical elements of our religion reflected deeper conflicts.  Good men began to understand that the problem wasn't just in our logos, but in our pathos and ethos, as well. Paedocommunion (hereafter PC) has been one of the hottest points of contention.  PC has always been normal to me as I grew up with it.  I underst...
Post a Comment
Read more