Skip to main content

Big Government & the PPP Loans

Perhaps the greatest lie perpetuated by Liberalism is that opposition to government involvement in a cause is opposition to that cause per se.

You oppose government involvement in welfare?  You want poor people to starve!

You oppose government involvement in education?  You want poor kids to be illiterate!

You oppose government involvement in healthcare?  You want poor people to die because they can't afford insulin or antibiotics!

And so on and so forth...

Unfortunately, most Americans can no longer imagine a world where anything is accomplished at all without government involvement.

Let me assure you that those of us who favor small government are, in fact, in favor of poor people eating, reading, and receiving medical treatment.  Many of us are, of course, the very poor people Liberals claim to want to help.  We recognize, however, that government agencies, especially those at the Federal level, are bloated bureaucracies that are unable to accomplish any goal efficiently.  

Exhibit A: the PPP loans.

The Paycheck Protection Program was designed to help companies bridge the gap during the COVID shutdowns, but ended up essentially as a slush fund for those who knew how access the funds.  Figures vary, but it is universally agreed that tens of billions were misappropriated, going to companies that didn't qualify and being used for anything but employees' paychecks.  What started out as a well-intentioned attempt to assist the American worker has since been called "the biggest fraud in US history."

The point is not that any one administration is corrupt or that the average IRS worker is a turncoat who hates his fellow countrymen.  The simple matter of the fact is that it is practically impossible to manage the disbursement of that much money efficiently.  The last census put the United States' population around 340 million people.  Any program that affects a significant portion of that many people is bound to suffer from inefficiencies and corruption. 

Moreover, the very people the PPP program was designed to help are now suffering from the loss of purchasing power that has resulted from three years of unfettered government spending.  Now we're attempting to resolve our problems by digging further and further into this miry hole we have dug.  The proactivity of the US government continues to create problems it then has to try to solve.

So, when a Conservative or Libertarian tells you he opposes [fill in the blank with any government program], don't buy the Liberal lie that we are heartless rich, white folks.  Most of us are not rich, many of us are not white, and very few of us are heartless.  We just understand that bloated government agencies rarely, if ever, accomplish their stated goal with any sort of efficiency.  

As Jim Quinn has so eloquently put it, "Liberalism always generates the exact opposite of its stated intent."

If government spending throughout COVID doesn't convince you of that, I'm not sure what will. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Real Presence & Paedocommunion: A Deeper Rift Between Reformed Churches

You're going back to Rome! Theological disagreements within the Reformed world, especially those of the last half century, often devolve into these sorts of accusations.  As controversialists like Doug Wilson and Peter Leithart began to break away from the larger conservative Presbyterian and Reformed denominations, it became clear that the rift was deeper than semantics and systematic minutiae.  Much like the Reformation four centuries before, the Table was a primary point of conflict.   What does it mean?  Who may partake?  What do we call it?    These questions, along with a few more, divided Reformed brethren as the physical elements of our religion reflected deeper conflicts.  Good men began to understand that the problem wasn't just in our logos, but in our pathos and ethos, as well. Paedocommunion (hereafter PC) has been one of the hottest points of contention.  PC has always been normal to me as I grew up with it.  I underst...

Some Thoughts on the 2024 Election

So, we had an election earlier this week.  Perhaps you heard about it. I have done my best to remain mostly silent on political issues this time around because I have found that fixating on such matters does little for my mental or spiritual health.  Also, no one cares what I think.  Nevertheless, here are a few thoughts on our recent election. 1) I didn't vote for Donald Trump, but I'd be lying if I said I'm not glad he won.  To be clear, that says more about Kamala Harris than about Donald Trump. 2) This election seemed much cleaner--much less suspicious--than the sordid affair we had in 2020.  This election didn't feature any poll workers tallying (discovering? conjuring?) votes behind closed doors in the wee hours of the night, messy mail-in voting, or voter turnout beyond plausible expectations.  The 2020 election had me convinced that we would never see another peaceful, uncontested election, but, as contentious as things were this year, it seems like...

Haiku for Bethany

Such a pretty girl The fairest, the loveliest Lovelier each day Kind, caring, friendly Generous, sacrificial Gentle, powerful Her love and her touch Sparks igniting in my chest Souls entwined, yet freed   Golden hair, brown eyes That bright smile that captured My gaze and my heart