Skip to main content

Big Government & the PPP Loans

Perhaps the greatest lie perpetuated by Liberalism is that opposition to government involvement in a cause is opposition to that cause per se.

You oppose government involvement in welfare?  You want poor people to starve!

You oppose government involvement in education?  You want poor kids to be illiterate!

You oppose government involvement in healthcare?  You want poor people to die because they can't afford insulin or antibiotics!

And so on and so forth...

Unfortunately, most Americans can no longer imagine a world where anything is accomplished at all without government involvement.

Let me assure you that those of us who favor small government are, in fact, in favor of poor people eating, reading, and receiving medical treatment.  Many of us are, of course, the very poor people Liberals claim to want to help.  We recognize, however, that government agencies, especially those at the Federal level, are bloated bureaucracies that are unable to accomplish any goal efficiently.  

Exhibit A: the PPP loans.

The Paycheck Protection Program was designed to help companies bridge the gap during the COVID shutdowns, but ended up essentially as a slush fund for those who knew how access the funds.  Figures vary, but it is universally agreed that tens of billions were misappropriated, going to companies that didn't qualify and being used for anything but employees' paychecks.  What started out as a well-intentioned attempt to assist the American worker has since been called "the biggest fraud in US history."

The point is not that any one administration is corrupt or that the average IRS worker is a turncoat who hates his fellow countrymen.  The simple matter of the fact is that it is practically impossible to manage the disbursement of that much money efficiently.  The last census put the United States' population around 340 million people.  Any program that affects a significant portion of that many people is bound to suffer from inefficiencies and corruption. 

Moreover, the very people the PPP program was designed to help are now suffering from the loss of purchasing power that has resulted from three years of unfettered government spending.  Now we're attempting to resolve our problems by digging further and further into this miry hole we have dug.  The proactivity of the US government continues to create problems it then has to try to solve.

So, when a Conservative or Libertarian tells you he opposes [fill in the blank with any government program], don't buy the Liberal lie that we are heartless rich, white folks.  Most of us are not rich, many of us are not white, and very few of us are heartless.  We just understand that bloated government agencies rarely, if ever, accomplish their stated goal with any sort of efficiency.  

As Jim Quinn has so eloquently put it, "Liberalism always generates the exact opposite of its stated intent."

If government spending throughout COVID doesn't convince you of that, I'm not sure what will. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

"Father, Forgive Them"

“Father, forgive them, for they know not what they do.” Forgiveness is hard.  Forgiveness is really, really hard. It’s difficult to forgive others who have genuinely harmed or offended us.   It’s easy to say , “I forgive you,” but it’s extremely difficult to feel it–to make peace in our hearts with the injustices that others have perpetrated against us. It just doesn’t feel right.  Sin should be punished!  Wrongs should be righted!  Right?! It’s difficult to forgive others when they ask for it.  It’s even more difficult to forgive them when they haven’t asked for it–when they don’t even recognize what they’ve done to hurt us. As our Savior hung upon His Cross, He asked the Father to forgive those nearby–those who were unwittingly contributing to the greatest injustice in the history of the world. These thieves, soldiers, and standers-by had no idea what was happening.  They had no idea that the jealousy of the Jews had placed Christ on that Cross...

5 Reasons I Want my Wife to Start Wearing a Head Covering during Corporate Worship

    Of late, the issue of head coverings has come up in my circle.  Okay...my cousin and I have been discussing it, but the point is, the issue has been bouncing around my head for the past few days.  It is a topic that I have avoided for some time.  Every time I read through 1 Corinthians, I would tell myself, "We'll get around to that."  The reality is that I didn't want to be "that guy"...that guy who people view as a chauvinistic jerk who wants to make sure everyone--especially his wife--remembers that he's the head of his home.  I think I'm beginning to respect "that guy"--those men who have cared enough to stand for what they believe.     Let me be clear that I am referring to head coverings for women (those old enough to leave them on...)  DURING CORPORATE WORSHIP.  I am not advocating head coverings at all times.  Though I see nothing necessarily wrong that practice, I don't see any command for it either.   ...

Paedocommunion: Consistent Covenantalism or Anti-Confessionalism?

    Being raised as a paedocommunionist (that means our kids get to eat Jesus, too), I have always been amazed by how passionately credocommunionists (that means their kids don't get to eat Jesus until they articulate a "credible" profession of faith) dislike the practice.  I would think that they could look at paedocommunion and at least respect it as an attempt to live out Covenant Theology in a consistent way.  Instead, paedocommunionists have been widely viewed as being on the fringe of the fringe (yes, that far) of Reformed Theology.  I like to think that I have been able to agree-to-disagree in an amicable way with my credocommunionist friends.  However, I will admit that being discounted as "unconfessional" (trust me, I've been called worse) has made many paedocommunionists (you'd have to ask my friends whether or not that applies to me) act in a manner that lacks Christian grace.     So, the question remains, is paedocommunion a view hel...